It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by XPhiles
OK ok no more smoke rings though I feel its not off topic, considering it maybe smoke.
This image was on C2C where it was introduced to the masses of the paranormal. My first thought on that site was, not another smoke picture.. I'm just here giving my formal opinion.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Keith Saint "the photographer" took another immediate photograph of the same scene but the "artifact" had disappeared.
It's feasible to consider that smoke scatters and dissipate pretty fast. That could explain the "artifact" not being in the next picture.
I don't think its ET nor either the esoteric Black Manta.
Lets just call it a unidentified flying smoke object or UFSO.
I created another illustration, critic's are welcome.
Originally posted by timski
What time was this taken on Sunday 3rd??? I was out sailing in Tynemouth that afternoon and didnt see/hear anything other than the commercial flights into Newcastle airport and occaisional Lifeguard chopper
Originally posted by timeless test
My first thought when seeing this image was of the similarity in some ways to so called "rods".
In particular, the relatively well defined spine of the object and the very fuzzy and ill defined wings. Whilst many rod pictures are of much longer objects some are truncated and almost all show the wave like formation seen in the "wings" of this object.
It is generally believed that the vast majority of "rod" pictures are blurred images of small insects
Originally posted by Sainty999
Hi Im Keith and I took this photo on the 29.8.06
According to the metadata on the RAW file it was taken 20.03hrs
A RAW file is a kind of digital negative
We heard no noise when I took this shot and I would say that it was 2 to 3 miles away
I had the camera at about 30 degrees
Originally posted by tomra
Originally posted by Sainty999
Hi Im Keith and I took this photo on the 29.8.06
According to the metadata on the RAW file it was taken 20.03hrs
A RAW file is a kind of digital negative
We heard no noise when I took this shot and I would say that it was 2 to 3 miles away
I had the camera at about 30 degrees
According to your metadata...what is the shutterspeed/aperture/lens for this exposure?
Looks very similiar to a motionblur "artifact"...
Originally posted by tomra
Originally posted by Sainty999
Hi Im Keith and I took this photo on the 29.8.06
According to the metadata on the RAW file it was taken 20.03hrs
A RAW file is a kind of digital negative
We heard no noise when I took this shot and I would say that it was 2 to 3 miles away
I had the camera at about 30 degrees
According to your metadata...what is the shutterspeed/aperture/lens for this exposure?
Looks very similiar to a motionblur "artifact"...
Originally posted by Sainty999
Originally posted by tomra
Originally posted by Sainty999
Hi Im Keith and I took this photo on the 29.8.06
According to the metadata on the RAW file it was taken 20.03hrs
A RAW file is a kind of digital negative
We heard no noise when I took this shot and I would say that it was 2 to 3 miles away
I had the camera at about 30 degrees
According to your metadata...what is the shutterspeed/aperture/lens for this exposure?
Looks very similiar to a motionblur "artifact"...
Originally posted by jbondo
I first saw this a couple of days ago at UFO digest and to tell the truth it all looks kinda airbrushy to me. In fact at first I thought it was a painting.
The whole scene looks somewhat artificial to me.
Originally posted by kuhl
Originally posted by XPhiles
OK ok no more smoke rings though I feel its not off topic, considering it maybe smoke.
This image was on C2C where it was introduced to the masses of the paranormal. My first thought on that site was, not another smoke picture.. I'm just here giving my formal opinion.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Keith Saint "the photographer" took another immediate photograph of the same scene but the "artifact" had disappeared.
It's feasible to consider that smoke scatters and dissipate pretty fast. That could explain the "artifact" not being in the next picture.
I don't think its ET nor either the esoteric Black Manta.
Lets just call it a unidentified flying smoke object or UFSO.
I created another illustration, critic's are welcome.
Are you purposly triing to derail this?because IMO it does not lok like smoke
or dissapaiting smokebut I may be wrong?
Originally posted by D4rk Kn1ght
img82.imageshack.us...
Here I used smart sharpen, desaturate, and then inverted the colours to give an idea of the shape.
Very unusual what ever it is, and the only thing i can think of is either a UCAV, or another one of those 'organic type' UFO's that have been spotted in the past.
Sainty, I would be deeply appreciative if I could get you to u2u me so i can give you my email addy to have the origional as it were. Would this be possible? I'd love to have a real good look at it.
send me an email I will email you the image [email protected]
I only logged on here so that I could put my side of the story
[edit on 15-9-2006 by D4rk Kn1ght]
Originally posted by rand
Bigger image here
The leading and trailing edges are curved; all stealth aircraft we know about have straight edges. Not only that, but left and right "wings" seem to curve in different directions. That's characteristic of a flat, flexible, kitelike object.
Try bosting the contrast a bit (the image is looks overexposed): suddenly it looks more like a sunset, and the object looks just like a diamond-wing kite. There's even a hint of a tail.