It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dgtempe
No problem. I was also over reacting and i am sorry for that.
Let today be a good day. My intentions were well meaning. Sorry.
To debunk our theory Shermer cites an assertion in a book by Victor Stenger that the product of mass, velocity and distance of a quantum system cannot exceed Planck’s constant. I’ve not seen this proposal in a peer reviewed journal, nor listed anywhere as a serious interpretation of quantum mechanics. But in any case Stenger’s assertion is disproven by Anton Zeilinger’s experimental demonstration of quantum wave behavior in fullerenes and biological porphyrin proteins. (Skepticism should cut both ways, Mr. Shermer.) Nonetheless I agree with Stenger that synaptic chemical transmission between neurons is completely classical. The quantum computations we propose are isolated in microtubules within neurons. Classical neurotransmission provides inputs to, and outputs from, microtubule quantum computations mediating consciousness in neuronal dendrites.
Originally posted by dgtempe
..back the idea of proof...Well said, Laz.
thank you for helping dissect this.
Originally posted by 2manyquestions
@ StreetCorner Philosopher
I thought the posters in this thread clearly established that "Quantum Physics" isn't a field of study which would teach you to do any of these things you listed, though MAYBE in some way it might someday explain the process of how a person can convince him/herself to feel this way, and experience physical benefits.
Studying to learn how to think positively (which is effective) does not equal to studying Quantum Physics. It would be like saying you're studying Biology, when in fact you're studying Art. I understand that a few New Age Mystics and healers try to insert the words "Quantum Physics" into their teachings in order to convince more people to listen to them,.... because, after all, a branch of Science supports their theories (which at this point is denied by the majority of Quantum Physicists).
QP has nothing to do with spirituality or self-improvement at this point. Self improvement cannot be called QP, no matter how effective this self-improvement technique is. It would be the same as calling land "water", and water "land".
So in short, the serious study of Quantum Physics has nothing to do with Self-improvement or spirituality at this point.
Mod Note: Big Quote – Please Review This Link.
[edit on 23-8-2006 by DontTreadOnMe]
Originally posted by StreetCorner Philosopher
...go out and look into QP if you spend all this time on this thread worryin if people actually know the subject.
“If you can generate the same emotions that you will have when your desire is fulfilled, you align vibrationally with the reality of the desire fulfilled, and thus become a magnet to it.” ~Bob Doyle
This quote from Bob Doyle is what visualizing is all about. In order to get in sync with what we desire, we have to become a match to it, in a vibrational/feeling sense. We have to “become it” energetically. Energy is what creates, it is the mechanism behind the Law of Attraction. It is the magnetic field that attracts those filings to us. And the way we do it is by utilizing our feeling nature, or our emotions.
Originally posted by dgtempe
Dontthreadonme,
Its ok to leave it as it is. [edit on 24-8-2006 by dgtempe]
Originally posted by StreetCorner Philosopher
A PC or any computer was considered to me metaphysical and impossible if you asked anyone only 60 years ago.
[edit on 8/24/2006 by StreetCorner Philosopher]