It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 25cents
please tell me you didn't just discount evolution with that wildly ignorant 'logic' of yours.
if you pay attention to the changes in one generation, parent to child, and apply that over hundreds of millions of years, it's quite clear that evolution is a viable process for the rise of humanity. furthermore, mutations in a species arise quit often - if the mutation is beneficial to survival, then that member of the species can breed more effectively as it lives longer, and pass its genes on to it's children. simple genetics is more than enough proff for the validity of evolution.
if you choose to think that some mystical Dungeon Master of a god rolled some dice and created the universe in a period of 7 days, that's your perogative, but please leave the teaching of our children to individuals who actually think outside of what they're told.
Originally posted by 25cents
that's the point though - human life is utterly irrelevant. there is absolutely nothin for you to conciously (or unconciously) because all of the matter in your body is eaten and disperesed to the rest of the earth. the afterlife is simply a creation based on a humans fear of death.
you're not making any sense. in no way did you make any kind of valid argument against evolution or for creation.
Originally posted by 25cents
so this edntire post is based entirely on your opinion without any actual evidence for or against?
Originally posted by 25cents
that's the point though - human life is utterly irrelevant. there is absolutely nothin for you to conciously (or unconciously) because all of the matter in your body is eaten and disperesed to the rest of the earth. the afterlife is simply a creation based on a humans fear of death.
Originally posted by LancerJ1
hmmm..........your good, your good. But this is only a theory, it hasnt been proven has it?
I guess this implies you dont believe in ghosts?
Originally posted by fennek77
Bible: The centerpiece of this debate. The Bible created religion, introduced creationism and taught ideals to its followers. We can proove as fact the Bible is true and its words are common place in todays society, are we forgetting this book created the growing free-world?
The bible is the word of God, Genesis 1 and 2 speak of the start and creation itself.
Evolution makes arguements that are indirect at attempting to disproove the word of God. The Bible is physical, it has a timeline, it has truth. Evolution cannot proove its own credibility as the theory's predate life capable of scripture, speech and text. This is where the Bible rules out evolution as total.
Assume too much: If i suggest evolution is correct, then i 'assume' without explaination that something went bang billions of years ago (fair game, high chance this occured) and every bit of matter and energy comes from somewhere
'unknown', but we still interpret these things with eye sight and use of math, which draws a conclusion but doesnt answer the question of origin.
You cant acknowledge an unknown origin object just because we see it? Lets pretend an object is red, the color is used to communicate and study the object.
Maybe this object is complex beyond sight but what we can see, we can measure and when the object reacts with another to form a differant color object - then we have science fact. Science explains how we (humans) can interpret the big and small and of differant make-up - what science cant explain is the origin of matter and energy beyond our primative senses (sight, hearing, taste etc.).
Assume its just there? Assume it works because we proove so with numbers? Assume we hold the highest sensory perception above all other creatures?
Consider this, in some cases your backyard animal can sense danger (earthquake, hurricane) hours and even days before a human (in some cases, not always). This suggests animals have a much higher sensory perception, which can rate wild/unintelligent creatures higher than humans (on the sensory scale).
'World based on what ya got' - Our world, this debate, is based on what we as humans have to measure our arguement and frankly, what we have is default and our world is built upon such, to consider things outside the common is judged wrong for a good reason, i know. But i also argue that is what seperates mankind, those who live their life, choosing to govern their life on a 'realist' or 'perception' based guidance are stuffed, religion speaks of Hell as a place visited when a person sins, Hell could simply be the downfall of ones life, well-being and result of sudden death. The guidelines are simple - in practice, they freed europe from Nazi's, they faught for vietnam, they introduced freedom to oppressed corners of the globe, they have ensured the freedom of millions of individuals. The principals i speak of, attract people from all over the globe regardless of nationality and define 'multi-cultural' as common-place.
Originally posted by fennek77
BTW whats wrong with origins? The start of time is a pretty good place to look..
I dont care if i go back onto this over and over, becuase you cant answer that with your scientific guff.
Also, who cares if some peasants changed a few words in the bible? IT WORKS
Thats my whole point, it works, it established the world as we know it, i doubt evolution would have ever inspired civilisation to the point it is at now.
You cant argue against creationism unless you counter as to the origins of energy, matter, space, time etc. You sure know how to tell me about them and how youve read about the subject, what they do.. but i wana know what you think?
Science save the day please, explain to me what i already know about my surroundings.
Originally posted by 25cents
nihilism - the belief that nothing truly exists. a conundrum in and of itself, it's also self sustaining.
and it's not so difficult, really. a few molecules of several elements bonded in such a way as to self-replicate, and after a time some of those replications mutated, made life easier from themselves, and replaced the others. this continued for millions and millions of years, and is still continuing.
i think people hate science because it tells them that they're not all that special.