It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
This is the first one I saw... There are more if you need. AAC
How can I misinterpret a building engineer say, after the plane hit, I hear a series of explosions that I thoght was coming from the basement. I thought it sounded like a boiler blowing up.
One of the first firefighters in the stricken second tower, Louie Cacchioli, 51, told People Weekly on Sept. 24: "I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building."
Kim White, 32, an employee on the 80th floor, also reported hearing an explosion. "All of a sudden the building shook, then it started to sway. We didn't know what was going on," she told People. "We got all our people on the floor into the stairwell . . . at that time we all thought it was a fire . . .We got down as far as the 74th floor . . . then there was another explosion."
Then we heard this sound, this boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. I?m like what the hell is that? It was four ESU cops coming down the stairs and they weren?t even touching the tread. They were going from landing to landing. We had to put our backs up against the wall to get out of the way.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
The phrase I'm telling you was on the "loose Change" video. It was a building engineer stating that he heard the explosion from underneath him, that's why he thought it was a boiler.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
What boilers?
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
Originally posted by HowardRoark
What boilers?
Perhaps the ones that heat he 100 stories of water? Just a guess. Do you not comment on all of the other testimonials, or are you stuck to disproving this one? AAC
Originally posted by HowardRoark
If there were no boilers in the building, doesn’t that make the statement by the “building engineer” suspect?
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by HowardRoark
If there were no boilers in the building, doesn’t that make the statement by the “building engineer” suspect?
Just to chime in... municipal steam does not go to every building in NYC, and the newer the building, the less likely it is to be connected to the steam system. I would be very surprised if the WTC connected to the steam system (it would likely overwhelm the aging network of old pipes).
Also... many statements related to 9/11 are suspect.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
Your post only helps. What does a boiler historically make? Steam. Steam pipes leading to the WTC have vessels for each unit. Those vessels are kept underneath the WTC for WTC use.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
Why are you still on this topic? Unless this engineer knew that it was going to be a conspiracy, and he knew to come out and claim some falsehood, then you have merit. But do you really believe that? Why don't you answer more palpable question from above?
Originally posted by HowardRoark
What is lame is that you are assuming something that did not exist.
There were no boilers on site at the WTC complex.
Three words for you:
“New York Steam”
If there were no boilers in the building, doesn’t that make the statement by the “building engineer” suspect?
If the statement by the “building engineer” is suspect, doesn’t that make the accuracy of the video suspect?
Originally posted by misguidedprophet
if you think you are so smart, why is it that you claims are based on highly objective information not subjective (if you know the diff)???