It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by wondernut
Originally posted by tuccy
Lost no freedom.
Gained a bit more security.
But then maybe I'm not paranoid enough
go try to climb the statue of liberty
go try to bring gatoraid on a plane
go talk on your phone without being monitored
good luck, cause those are 3 of the fredoms you lost just in the last few months
securty comes at the cost of freedom by nature
after being a computer tech for 5 years i can assure you, there is no such thing as security, only its illusion and the idiots who believe it will protect them
locks dont keep theves out, they keep honest men honest
all the laws in the world will not prevent people from killing each other
edit:
and no i'm not a bad computer tech either, i'm an honest one
the only method of creating flawless security is to not make anything that needs securing
since that's impossible and all man made systems are flawed there can be no such thing as security.
"where there's a will, there's a way"
anyone determined enough will get past all the security you set up to protect yourself
the only sure way to protect yourself is to kill yourself before they kill you first!
[edit on 12-8-2006 by wondernut]
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Im so glad you consider basic privacy and civil rights to be mere "convienences".
Originally posted by Slap Nuts
You have no right to privacy.
With a SINGLE SEARCH the NSA can get most of your:
Bank transactions (Combined with shared store data a list of EVERYTHING you buy item by item)
Credit Report
Medical Records (Possibly with DNA)
Criminal Records
Phone records
Internet Histories
Educational Records
Vehicle registration information
Gun Registrations
[edit on 11-8-2006 by Slap Nuts]
Chertoff Says U.S. Needs More Authority
The nation's chief of homeland security said Sunday that the U.S. should consider reviewing its laws to allow for more electronic surveillance and detention of possible terror suspects, citing last week's foiled plot.
Michael Chertoff, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, stopped short of calling for immediate changes, noting there might be constitutional barriers to the type of wide police powers the British had in apprehending suspects in the plot to blow up airliners headed to the U.S.
But Chertoff made clear his belief that wider authority could thwart future attacks at a time when Congress is reviewing the proper scope of the Bush administration's executive powers for its warrantless eavesdropping program and military tribunals for detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
More...
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Liberties that I have lost.......
None really. I can still buy a firearm, I can still call my Congressmen idiots in public, I can still travel whenever I want, I can still pretty much do whatever I want.
Wiretaps?
Was much worse under Clinton. Of course, the government has always had the ability to wiretap anyone (and has used it long before the Patriot Act).
Bank accounts?
Funny, I walked into a local bank a couple months ago and walked out less than 30 minutes later with a new account. No background check needed. Yes, if I walk in and deposit 10 grand in cash they will notify the government, but thats been a practice for over 15 years.
Libraries?
Who cares if someone knows I read Tom Clancy or Anne Coulter?
Right to privacy?
Sorry, not listed in the Constitution. In actuality, your rights only extend to the point that it endangers others, and that has ALWAYS been the case. With the exception of Roe V. Wade.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
So someone takes a good look at my carry on at the airport..big deal. So I cannot carry my shampoo on anymore, oh wait, I always pack that in the checked baggage.
Dont you think the families of the hijacked jets on 9/11 wish that security would have confiscated the knives????
Originally posted by Peyres
erm, you can't prove your phone is being tapped. And looking at your other 'freedom curbs'.....OOOOOOOOhhhhh the evil NWO is out to get you, you can't bring certain items on a plane!!!!!! Evil baby eating, devil worshippers
Originally posted by loam
Wake up people.... :shk:
Michael Chertoff, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, stopped short of calling for immediate changes, noting there might be constitutional barriers to the type of wide police powers the British had in apprehending suspects in the plot to blow up airliners headed to the U.S.
Originally posted by wondernut
keep telling yourself that long enough and you'll eventually stop believing it when they rip the gun from your hands
yes, but they have never had every phone (in/out bound of usa) wiretapped 24/7 until reciently
i'll give you that one, but background checks are becoming more common place
umm, the government's anti-terrorism units?
what happens if the library screws up and accidently scans "the anarchist's cookbook" instead of the book you are holding, or for that matter if the computer glitches and does that
guess what, your name just got redflagged in a database somewhere!
actually you misinterpret the constitution
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
the part in question is the "among these" part, indicating there are more than just three rights to which every man is endowed, but these three are so important that they were mentioned by name to ensure they would stand if all others failed, because all god given rights are, in one way or another, covered by these three
had they not intended this view they would have wrote "... that are ..."
do not so quickly give up what so many have died for to ensure you receive
hmm, interesting point, what's to keep terrorists from checking their liquid explosives?
a bottle full of one part of the bomb, some time release capsules filled with the the other part inside them, and a capsule of lithium to detonate it
besides law enforcement, weapons have always been illegal on planes, bottled water has not.
go read your constitution and realize what your rights are so the next time they get trampled on you might know and protest
Originally posted by Mouth
Please. You think the government has enough employees to monitor EVERY phonecall?
Originally posted by Mouth
Here's a notion: Don't do anything illegal, and you got nothing to worry about.
Originally posted by Mouth
That is a big what if....
Originally posted by Mouth
Doesn't say anything about privacy, which is what the other post discussed
Originally posted by Slap Nuts
No, they have computers to sift and mine data. Inform yourself.
The expectation and right to privacy is granted to those NOT breaking the law under the constitution. I'm "legit" but they have no right to complie my life on a disc for future "profiliing", etc. You do not understand the immense implications.
That is a matter of opinion and since you do not seem to know much about data warehousing and data mining I believe you are unqualified to form an opinion on this topic.
I suggest you learn what the word liberty means. Maybe if you read more about the constitution and the bill of rights, American history, the founding fathers and their goals, reasoning and intents, you would understand a little better.
lib·er·ty (lbr-t)
n. pl. lib·er·ties
1.
a. The condition of being free from restriction or control.
b. The right and power to act, believe, or express oneself in a manner of one's own choosing.
c. The condition of being physically and legally free from confinement, servitude, or forced labor. See Synonyms at freedom.
2. Freedom from unjust or undue governmental control.
3. A right or immunity to engage in certain actions without control or interference: the liberties protected by the Bill of Rights.
4.
a. A breach or overstepping of propriety or social convention. Often used in the plural.
b. A statement, attitude, or action not warranted by conditions or actualities: a historical novel that takes liberties with chronology.
c. An unwarranted risk; a chance: took foolish liberties on the ski slopes.
5. A period, usually short, during which a sailor is authorized to go ashore.
You sound like you are a fascist?
Originally posted by tuccy
Lost no freedom.
Gained a bit more security.
But then maybe I'm not paranoid enough
Originally posted by Mouth
Does the word privacy come up here?
Originally posted by Mouth
Oh, so you must be an expert. Whatever man, sorry that YOU think that I am unqualified to form an opinion. Please.