It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Duhh
Even though no one care if they work or not! LOL! Atleast not the CT crowd. They hate this!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Originally posted by icyblue
When was the last time a plane fell out of the sky or exploded,because of a cell phone?
LX 498 Crossair crash
Slovenian emergency landing
First alarm was set when cell phones became widely spread and equipment errors became more often but still there were no direct evidences. Till 2000 some of the countries didn't joint to the ban against cell phones but an air crash of the flight number LX 498 Crossair (Saab 340) considerably changed the situation. It was not far from Zurich on the 10. of January 2000. Ten passengers and a whole crew perished in that air crash. For a long time the results of flight recorders decoding were not announced but at last it was a sensation. One of the reasons of the crash was an SMS message, which was received by one of the passengers, and a next cell phone conversation. Navigation monitoring devices showed wrong data at that moment, what led to a crash. Comments of independent experts were not comforting, they said that crew could improve the situation but it also made a mistake and crash was inevitable. Everybody agreed that an airplane fortune depended on crew actions and crew professionalism after electrical fsystems stopped working. Those countries which hadn't joint to the ban before, hurried on to do it. After that this air crash was forgotten.
Thursday, March 2, 2006; Posted: 8:10 p.m. EST (01:10 GMT)
(CNN) -- Just when you thought it was safe to switch on your cell phone, it seems that making calls in the air could pose a greater risk than running up an exorbitant bill.
A new study by scientists at the Carnegie Mellon University shows that interference caused by mobile phones may create more interference to aircraft navigation systems than previously thought.
If true, the findings -- which also reveal that many passengers are flouting current in-flight cell phone bans -- could call into question airline plans to wire jets to accommodate mobile networks.
Originally posted by twisted_fate
STUPID STUPID WOMAN!!! ugh..I wouldn't of asked her what phone she has, instead I would of slapped her and told her how damn stupid she is!
Phones do work..but with new phones coming out all the time with different freq, even though there is only a really really really really small chance of anything happening to the planes systems..they want to be safe then sorry..makes sense =)
Originally posted by Zaphod58
... may create more interference to aircraft navigation systems than previously thought.
www.usatoday.com...
Fliers may soon get to use cell phones
By Paul Davidson, USA TODAY
The spread of cell phones may soon reach forbidden turf: airline flights. At least two companies, AirCell and Verizon Airfone, are developing technology to let passengers use their cell phones without disrupting airplane electronics or ground cellular service.
Cell phones on planes
AirCell expects to charge less to make a cell phone call
than in-flight pay phones:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Connection fee, cost per minute
Verizon Airfone: $3.99, $3.99
AirCell: No fee, 75 cents to $1.50 roaming charge
The services would have to pass muster with the Federal Aviation Administration and Federal Communications Commission, which ban in-flight phone use.
AirCell is closest to ready and says service could be on planes in early 2004. Airline officials say a rollout might be three years away. Yet there is a new push by the airlines and regulators to make in-flight cell phone use a reality.
"We certainly want to work toward enabling customers to use their own cell phones," says Mary Rogozinski, United Airlines' manager of on-board systems planning.
physics911.ca...
Project Achilles Report Parts One, Two and Three
by A.K. Dewdney, January 23rd 2003
Preliminary low-altitude cellphone experiment
January 23 2003; 4:35 - 5:40 pm
Civic Airport, London, Ontario, Canada
Equipment:
aircraft: Diamond DA20/C1 Katana two-seater
engine: 125 hp
body & airframe: fiberglass/carbon fiber composite
weight fully loaded: 1630 lbs
cellphones: one Motorola model "120 CDMA" cellphone (A)
two Motorola "i1000 plus" cellphones (B)
(both fully charged at flight time)
The flight plan consisted of four "laps," elongated circuits (shaped like a paperclip) over London, Ontario airspace. Each lap was about seven to eight miles long and two to three miles wide. Three calls were made on each of two straight legs in each lap. Calls alternated between cellphone A and cellphone B. A second i1000, intended for use at higher altitudes, slipped to the cockpit floor and could not be retrieved in those cramped quarters. A check of battery levels of the first i1000, however, showed that there had been no significant power drain on the unit.
Mod Edit: No Quote/Plagiarism – Please Review This Link.
Mod Edit: External Source Tags – Please Review This Link.
[edit on 2/8/2006 by Mirthful Me]
Originally posted by lildevil585
I was sure that the only reason that you couldn't use cell phaones on airplanes was because there was a very small chance that the frequency would overlap with the signal coming from the control tower, and the pilot wouldn't know what to do.
Originally posted by lildevil585
I was sure that the only reason that you couldn't use cell phaones on airplanes was because there was a very small chance that the frequency would overlap with the signal coming from the control tower, and the pilot wouldn't know what to do.
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
Many people desperately want to believe the 9-11 conspiracies