It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MidnightDStroyer
BTW, collecting interest on a bank account helps the bank more than it helps you...With "fractional reserve banking" practices, they can loan out 90% of your money to someone else, charge them whatever interest on that loan & only fork about 3% back to your account. With increasing inflation & the rising cost of living, you're actually losing money by relying on your savings-interest.
Originally posted by BattleofBatoche
Move out of big cities and into the country and become self reliant.
The Federal reserve System was the crucial anomaly at the very core of represenative democracy, an uncomfortable contradiction with the civic mythology of self-government. Yet the American system accepted the inconsistency. The community of elected politicians acquiesced to its power. The private economy responded to its direction. Private capital depended on it for protection. The governors of the Federal Reserve decided the largest questions of the political economy, including who shall prosper and who shall fail, yet their role remained opaque and mysterious. The Federal Reserve was shielded from scrutiny partly by its own official secrecy, but also by the curious ignorance of the American public [sheeple]."
Makes me want to go on.......but it will be a slow read...
Peace!
The Federal reserve System was the crucial anomaly at the very core of represenative democracy, an uncomfortable contradiction with the civic mythology of self-government. Yet the American system accepted the inconsistency. The community of elected politicians acquiesced to its power. The private economy responded to its direction. Private capital depended on it for protection. The governors of the Federal Reserve decided the largest questions of the political economy, including who shall prosper and who shall fail, yet their role remained opaque and mysterious. The Federal Reserve was shielded from scrutiny partly by its own official secrecy, but also by the curious ignorance of the American public [sheeple]."
source: "Secrets of The Temple" by William Greider
The supposed sacrilege of men who created money was a constant theme in the most virulent tracts attacking the FED. One of them, "The Federal Reserve Hoax," written in the early 1960s by Wickliffe B. Vennard, Sr., explained, for instance, a dizzying series of historical connections between money and Democracy and Christian faith, the death of Christ, the assassination of Lincoln, and the Federal Open Market Committee:
"When our Lord and Master defied them by upsetting the tables and casting the money changers from his temple with a whip, He knew full well that within a week He would be nailed to a cross on Calvary....Abraham Lincoln, whose rash defiance [of bankers] cost him his life, saved this country billions in interest, because the money was not issued against debt as that issued by The Federal Reserve System.....This book is aimed at the Sanhedrin of today - the 12 men who control this country from behind the scenes."
Originally posted by ViewFromTheStars
What do you think about this report?
What do you think about this report?
I read that Wesley Snipes is about to take on the IRS, he is currently in Africa working on a movie and the IRS will charge him as he hasn't filed in about 6 years. He knows there is no law requiring him to pay an income tax or file a 1040 so he is busy preparing his case. Hopefully he will be able to bring some publicity to this fraud.
Today the concept of legal tender refers to coercion. The government orders its subjects to accept irredeemable promises in payment for the real goods and real services they produce. If people refuse to comply with the order, then they put themselves outside of the law. But the term legal tender hasn't always meant coercion. It originated in a right, not an obligation, of the people. As recently as in 1933, in the United States 'legal tender' referred to the right of the people to take their worn gold coins still within the established tolerance standards and exchange them free of charge for full-bodied ones. The government, by law, was obliged to pick up the cost of wear and tear in the coinage. Unscrupulous employers were prevented from short-changing wage earners by putting underweight gold coins into the pay envelope. This refresher of the semantics of legal tender is a helpful reminder how the government uses the subtle process of twisting the meaning of words to introduce coercion where there was none before, to turn a right into an imposition and, ultimately, to help itself to the wealth of its subjects without due process of the law.
Source: www.gold-eagle.com...
Originally posted by Toadmund
We work for this employer, We work to flip burgers, we work to build things, we do all kinds of work for various employers.
But I guess we know who we all really work for, all our labour is to ultimately line the pockets of these scumbags, and we work damn hard for them!
What would it be like if the government itself controlled all the money, not for profit, and we actually owned the money collectively?
Would poverty in a rich country exist? We are so accustomed to this way of life, it's so ingrained into us, that we cannot possibly see the possibilities of what it would be like to not have our wealth leached away from us.
What would it be like? We can only wonder. I struggle to imagine.
[edit on 15-7-2006 by Toadmund]