This May Get Me Thrown Out Of Here--BUT Here Goes

Originally posted by joshai2334
This is the trailer, 18 minutes long. The whole video will be out in four more weeks.

I also have copies of the STS-80 filmclips A B and C--the ones NASA let slip, that let the cat out of the bag in 1995. So, it wasn't hard to pick up from that point, ... to Escamilla's work.

heelstone, I don't trust them either. But they're holding our futures in their hands, and we better start getting aware of the exopolitical map. The outcomes we are getting are not looking good.











[edit on 11-6-2006 by joshai2334]

Hey, do you have the NASA videos that supposedly show the "glass domes" on the moon? I believe it was "moon shot" or a mutiple video set released by NASA about the race to the moon. It shows a fast-moving slide show at the end of the video of many moon pics. In one, it is claimed that you can clearly see domes and some architecture from the moon.

Originally posted by Tandoku
Anybody have more information on the Gemini "we have a bogey" incident and the accomponying film image in the trailer? Is the footage matched to the quote?

An aside: UFO documentaries need to steer clear of recreating, fabricating or repurposing file footage to portray an incident. For example, using stock footage during the Battle of LA sequence in this trailer detracts from the impact of the audio and photographic evidence. Instead of focusing on the evidence, the viewer will question whether the evidence presented is a fabrication, or actual footage/audio/film, etc. It undermines the power of the evidence.

And what about John Glenn's supposed sightings of some brilliant lights outside of his space capsule, as depicted briefly on The Right Stuff?

Whether you believe it or not, no-one can deny that this strange anomaly looks extremely like the 'rods' featured in the aforementioned film. What do other people think?




[edit on 12-6-2006 by Delta Alter]

Why would this get you kicked out of here?

I guess it's still a conspiracy website..

Saw the video and it was good stuff, know about the rods etc. They are believed to be like a bird etc from the 4th dimensional space that bleeds through into our space for some reason?

That's the best explaination that I have come across to date.

They are definitely out there and they are real and more and more people are seeing them. Hopefully someday I will too.

Originally posted by joshai2334
I don't know how you folks can sit here and pontificate about plausible
good intentions of ETs. It's quite apparent to me, all they want to do is
to help us annihilate each other.

We do quite a good job of trying to annihilate each other without having some UFO aliens egg us on. In an evolutionary model, we compete with each other for scarce resources, ensuring that the ones most fit for this environment survive and continue our genetic strain. We'd still be slaughtering each other even if there were no UFOs.

We like it.



P.S.

And as far as THIS video loop is concerned, look around the web for a little longer version of it. A few frames earlier, the object passes in FRONT of the corner of the other tower, making it obvious that it's a small object traveling at an angle not too far above the head of the cameraman. Like this:



Editing the thing down so it looks like it's coming from behind the towers it just a lot of disengenuous crapola.

[edit on 12-6-2006 by Enkidu]

Look around the web for a longer version??

It took me the best part of 2 days to find that piece of disengenuous crapola thank you very much!

Originally posted by Delta Alter
Whether you believe it or not, no-one can deny that this strange anomaly looks extremely like the 'rods' featured in the aforementioned film. What do other people think?

[edit on 12-6-2006 by Delta Alter]

Could easily be a flying bug to me...

very intriguing video clip,i am going to charge my camcorder and see what i can get and post any luck on here. I'm kind of excited

who would believe ...

[edit on 12-6-2006 by Burginthorn]

All bugs aside
The only thing of interest was the interview of the man regarding the object over a swamp. He seemed credible enough. All the others shown seemed to be playing to the camera. Since the films are all but useless junk the credibility of those speaking is far more important in my humble opinion. I'd view the finished product for entertainment value but unless there is much better evidence than the teaser shows it won't change many minds. I think this film will do more harm than good from what I've seen so far. Filmmakers always show their best stuff in the teaser, not the other way around. I don't expect there will be any more substance. Just people talking about what we just watched and throwing slanderous remarks around about anyone who does not agree with them. If there is proof on the film I'll be the first to appologize.

i think its good to make a film explaining the et reality and showing it to the rest of the world and let them make up their own minds, the smart ones will get it and the rest will continue to be irrelevant like theyve always been

I thought that was a neat video.

I think the biggest reason they remain hidden, is because of how the majority of the world populous would accept them. They would be seen as either gods or aliens. Gods would have unchallenged control, and those who believe them to be gods would be willing and accepting of them. While those who believe the visitors to be simply aliens from off the earth, would be more prone to revolt and or cause problems. Is it possible that the aliens are influencing those with power to destroy similarly power leaders simply to rid the earth of those ppl that could cause problems for them later on? This whole scenario is really starting to remind me of the X-Files movie. But the questions remain, would you rather think of yourself as a genetically engineered primate, whos purpose is to breed and increase the population so that an alien race can use you for theyre own purposes; or would you rather be a divine creation of an Almighty God who exists outside the universe?

For the people of the world as a whole, its not actuallity that shapes our beliefs, its our desires and selfishness that creates and decides what we will believe.

Originally posted by ayleon
i think its good to make a film explaining the et reality and showing it to the rest of the world and let them make up their own minds, the smart ones will get it and the rest will continue to be irrelevant like theyve always been

Be careful with that comment, remember just because you believe in what you see doesn't mean that some one you disagree with, is less intelligent.
Sometimes i have looked at something, and totally was amazed only to learn it was either a fake, hoax or misinterpretation.

So, yes, i believe, but take each bit of evidence objectively.

I found this video to be very interesting. Thanks for posting it!

I plan on purchasing the DVD when it comes out July 8th.

All of this is very interesting to read about, whether it's true or not. After researching on and off for a year, I tend to take things with a grain of salt as some things are quite unbelievable. But, anything is possible

Originally posted by LAES YVAN
"Please be informed there is a Santa Clause".

Yeah, that wigged me out too. Santa lives in the North Pole with his wife and helpers and he gives out presents to good little children.

Im not sure about giving of gifts but we do know that Santa lives very far from us but still close by, continents to north pole, earth to moon. Santa has so much work that he has helpers, elves (unknown origin) and flies in the air in his sleigh/craft doing the impossible by visiting every house with a child on earth in one night.

Kinda creepy that nasa uses Santa Clause as code to indicate 'a something' when flying around the moon.

Oh you just put the Santa Clause name into a new light. Did you have to mention that he visits all the boys and girls in one night. Now I'm creeped. That is indeed a very strange thing for the government to call an ET craft... and we all know they didn't just pull the name out of a hat. Lets hope though that they call them that because they bring gifts and not because of the more creepy things Santa does.

I wanna add too that things like this make you wonder just how much the gov knows. In fact just because they refer to somthing in space as a Santa Clause should be a wake up call for everyone. Why would NASA call anything in space a Santa Clause It's obviously a code name but for what Gee IDK I wonder...

[edit on 14-6-2006 by Techsnow]

When the Truth must be spoken in riddles, in order to be understand, we're a long way from "truth-in-lending," "the whole truth and nothing but the truth," and "The truth shall make you free."

I don't believe anybody anymore, not even you.

Heh.
Y'know, it's wierd.
I have been saying for years, that there is so much going on right in front of our eyes, but (for whatever reason) we can't perceive it.
There could (and it could very well be) be many contributing factors to our inability to "see";
the introduction of mind/perception inhibiting substances in our food chain;
signals pumped into our daily lives via tv, radio, haarp, etc.;
even our own willfull ignorance ("I don't care about that stuff because it distracts me from ringtones, american idol, which car I wish I had, what colour I want my hair"... you get the idea).
But, I absolutely believe that there are things happening (on multi-dimensional levels) simultaneously with us but damed if I know why we can't see it (I can only speculate; however, I do believe that I'm on to something; ps I try not to praise myself very often, but when I'm right, I'm right...)
But yeah, very "They Live" kind of stuff (was that a clue too?)
I don't know about angels or demons or whatever (although, anything's possible because I totally believe in cosmic and multi-dimensional entities; especially ghosts; but that's a whole other thing).
Understandably, with our tiny, limited brains (which are trained from a very young age to have limited perception and be complacent) we have a really hard time "seeing" the reality in which we actually exist, but I also believe, that through will, we can begin to break down these barriers and see "reality".
I actually have a copy of some of that ufo footage ("Nasa Transmissions: the Smoking Gun") and I have watched it many times.
The first time I saw it, I got chills; not because I found it creepy or scary, but because, it felt like truth (then again, I could be wrong; but y'know when you get that feeling of what's really true and you get the chills, yeah, like that...)
I am also a believer that some of those things in the footage are "alive" or sentient (maybe beyond our current standards of what "alive" may be), but multi-dimensional, DEFINITELY!
So, what now?
I mean, most of the populace of our great and glorious country could (or couldn't; I'm not sure of the proper usage of the term here...) care less.
We're all crackpots.
Nuts.
Losers, with too much time on our hands.
Or...
Maybe people like us are the only ones with enough guts to come forward and say that we believe that there is more to life than what our tiny, limited brains can see (because we don't see with our eyes, we see with our minds...)
Did I stay on topic?
Should I tell the story about the ufo that I've seen?
Well, only if you are interested...

ps. to DiabolusFireDragon; do I know you?

Something funny, but perhaps useful...maybe someone could set up an experiment along the lines of what the "bug study" did. Either use a controlled environment like a bathroom or garage, let a bug in with an open hamburger or pie, and see if the bug shows up on film like the rods. Or, in your backyard, put a bunch of bug zappers around the camera, make notes at the times bugs get zapped and then correlate the bug zap times within a few seconds to what you've recorded. Eventually you should get a perfect image of a rod you would have otherwise thought was real and be able to cross reference it to your data on the timings of the zaps and thus either agree or disagree with the bug study theory on the basis of your own recordings. A controlled environment with no zapper might work better...glass patio, anyone?

I laughed as I was writing this, but, hey...