It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
By Brett Arends/ On State Street
Tuesday, November 23, 2004
Stephen Roach, the chief economist at investment banking giant Morgan Stanley, has a public reputation for being bearish.
But you should hear what he's saying in private.
Roach met select groups of fund managers downtown last week, including a group at Fidelity.
His prediction: America has no better than a 10 percent chance of avoiding economic "Armageddon."
Press were not allowed into the meetings. But the Herald has obtained a copy of Roach's presentation. A stunned source who was at one meeting said, "it struck me how extreme he was - much more, it seemed to me, than in public."
Roach sees a 30 percent chance of a slump soon and a 60 percent chance that "we'll muddle through for a while and delay the eventual Armageddon."
The chance we'll get through OK: one in 10. Maybe.
In a nutshell, Roach's argument is that America's record trade deficit means the dollar will keep falling. To keep foreigners buying T-bills and prevent a resulting rise in inflation, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan will be forced to raise interest rates further and faster than he wants.
The result: U.S. consumers, who are in debt up to their eyeballs, will get pounded.
Less a case of "Armageddon," maybe, than of a "Perfect Storm."
Roach marshaled alarming facts to support his argument.
To finance its current account deficit with the rest of the world, he said, America has to import $2.6 billion in cash. Every working day.
That is an amazing 80 percent of the entire world's net savings.
Sustainable? Hardly.
Meanwhile, he notes that household debt is at record levels.
Twenty years ago the total debt of U.S. households was equal to half the size of the economy.
Today the figure is 85 percent.
Nearly half of new mortgage borrowing is at flexible interest rates, leaving borrowers much more vulnerable to rate hikes.
Americans are already spending a record share of disposable income paying their interest bills. And interest rates haven't even risen much yet.
You don't have to ask a Wall Street economist to know this, of course. Watch people wielding their credit cards this Christmas.
Roach's analysis isn't entirely new. But recent events give it extra force.
The dollar is hitting fresh lows against currencies from the yen to the euro.
Its parachute failed to open over the weekend, when a meeting of the world's top finance ministers produced no promise of concerted intervention.
It has farther to fall, especially against Asian currencies, analysts agree.
The Fed chairman was drawn to warn on the dollar, and interest rates, on Friday.
Roach could not be reached for comment yesterday. A source who heard the presentation concluded that a "spectacular wave of bankruptcies" is possible.
Smart people downtown agree with much of the analysis. It is undeniable that America is living in a "debt bubble" of record proportions.
But they argue there may be an alternative scenario to Roach's. Greenspan might instead deliberately allow the dollar to slump and inflation to rise, whittling away at the value of today's consumer debts in real terms.
Inflation of 7 percent a year halves "real" values in a decade.
It may be the only way out of the trap.
Higher interest rates, or higher inflation: Either way, the biggest losers will be long-term lenders at fixed interest rates.
You wouldn't want to hold 30-year Treasuries, which today yield just 4.83 percent.
Source
The Governments are currently attempting to postpone the bursting of the bubble by creating more fiat currency. To date they have been successful: the bubble did not burst even in 2000 when stock markets fell severely, as evidenced by the growth rate of 9% that year in the number of US dollars (see the US money supply statistics in point 4). As the size and duration of the bubble grows, efforts to keep the bubble growing need to become more extreme—for example, worldwide interest rates are at record lows.
Source
Originally posted by the_sentinal
i have some cash holdings i think i'll switch to euro's just to be on the safe side...
Originally posted by Fuhr86
Interesting times ahead.
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
I posted something on this awhile back, I do not trust banks at all.....I hate them in fact. IF you look at their business practices it turns your stomach.
Originally posted by MidnightDStroyer
Originally posted by the_sentinal
i have some cash holdings i think i'll switch to euro's just to be on the safe side...
Best bet would be to get something tangible, like gold, silver & precious gemstones. Even the Euro is based on the same type of "fiat money" that the Dollar is on right now.
By Steven Goldberg
May 17, 2006
Vice President Cheney's financial advisers are apparently betting on a rise in inflation and interest rates and on a decline in the value of the dollar against foreign currencies. That's the conclusion we draw after scouring the financial disclosure form released by Cheney this week.
As of the end of last year, Cheney and his wife, Lynne, held between $10 million and $25 million in Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt fund (it's impossible to be more precise because the disclosure form lists holdings within ranges). The fund's holdings of tax-free municipal bonds mature, on average, in a little more than a year -- meaning that the fund should hold up well if rates rise. The Cheneys held another $1 million to $5 million in Vanguard Tax-Exempt Money Market fund, which is practically risk-free and could benefit from continued increases in short-term interest rates. And the couple had between $2 million and $10 million in Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities fund. The principal and interest payments of inflation-protected bonds rise along with consumer prices, making them good inflation hedges.
The Cheneys also had between $10 million and $25 million in American Century International Bond. The fund buys mainly high-quality foreign bonds (predominantly in Europe) and rarely hedges against possible increases in the value of the dollar. Indeed, its prospectus limits dollar exposure to 25% of assets and the fund currently has only 6% of assets in dollars, according to an American Century spokesman.
The Cheneys' total assets could be as high as $94.6 million, according to the disclosure form. The vice-president's advisers say the vice president pays no attention to his investments. His lawyer, Terrence O'Donnell, says outside money managers supervise the investments. "He has nothing to do with it," O'Donnell says.
As for stocks, the couple held between $1 million and $5 million in Lazard International Equity and a like amount in Lazard Emerging Markets funds. The Cheneys' relatively few U.S. stock fund holdings include $1 million to $5 million in GMO Tax-Managed U.S. Equities III.
Kiplinger Magazine
Either Cheney or his advisors are playing a very smart game.
Originally posted by Mdv2
industry: 20.4%
services: 78.7% (2005 est.)
Seen the size of the US economy, the industrial part really is of a very big importance.
Lately, I heard that there will be a very large demand (and shortage) the coming decenia for higher educated people as the economy continues to evolve.
Does anyone know what causes that I suddenly have to scroll horizontally?
Should you consider buying gold, consider buying coins rather than bars, as they are easier to carry with you. Be aware that the US government could claim any gold coming from the Federal Reserve, such as Gold Eagles , that's why a better option for instance would be (South African) Kruger Rands. Oh, and don't store it in a bank. Furthermore, gold might be the only option left companies accept to get you out of a country.
Originally posted by DeusEx
I WOULD say that certain metals do have consistent value, however, the world has not used gold or any other precious metal for a basis for currency in quite some time. I'm not sure about whether I would want precious metals as something to have around- it can be seized, it can fluxuate in value, and it's pretty limited as far as transactions go.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Any update on that? On another subject, my economic teacher told me that the suppression of M3 was because it was worthless and was hard to calculate...
Also, do anyone have information about Ben Bernanke being in bed with some secret societies or corporations? Thanks.
In a press release dated 10 November, 2005, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System announced that it would cease publication of the M3 monetary aggregate.[19] The Board stated that M3 "does not appear to convey any additional information about economic activity that is not already embodied in M2," and that the decision was reached largely because "the costs of collecting the underlying data and publishing M3 outweigh the benefits."
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Any update on that? On another subject, my economic teacher told me that the suppression of M3 was because it was worthless and was hard to calculate...
Also, do anyone have information about Ben Bernanke being in bed with some secret societies or corporations? Thanks.
They seem desperate to recreate the conditions of Nazi Germany in the US, and a currency panic would make it much easier for "strong government" to take and hold power, Just a thought.
Governors of six Gulf central banks, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, will meet next month as they seek to create the Middle East's first unified currency by 2010, a Qatari official said.
The meeting, planned for Nov. 4 in Jidda, is the next step in a round of talks among the six Gulf monarchies to discuss monetary union, Basheer Yousef al-Kahalooth, an official at the Qatar Central Bank, said by telephone from Doha, Qatar.
Monetary union among the Gulf monarchies, which pump about a fifth of the world's crude oil, may lead to the end of their currencies' peg to the dollar, and "a more flexible currency regime," said Monica Malik of Standard Chartered Bank in Dubai.
Herald Tribune
Dollar Falls as Russian Central Bank Will Increase Yen Reserves
By Daniel Kruger and Min Zeng
Oct. 16 (Bloomberg) -- The dollar fell the most against the yen in two weeks after Russia's central bank said it was adding the Japanese currency to its foreign-exchange reserves.
Traders sold the U.S. currency after Alexei Ulyukayev, the Russian central bank's first deputy chairman, told Interfax he may boost holdings from almost zero percent. Russia's reserves, the world's third largest, have swelled about 50 percent this year to $267.9 billion as oil prices surged. The U.S. currency rose to the highest against the yen this year on Oct. 13.
``The move could lead toward broader U.S. dollar weakness,'' said Mark Meadows, a strategist at currency-trading company Tempus Consulting in Washington. With the dollar near key trading points of 120 yen and $1.2470 per euro ``it brings up the question of whether the dollar is going to be able to sustain moves past these levels.''
`Dollar-Selling Factor'
``This is another dollar-selling factor,'' said Brian Dolan, research director at Forex.com, a unit of online currency trading firm Gain Capital in Bedminster, New Jersey, which has about $250 million worth of funds under management. ``It is eroding some of the dollar strength we have seen in the past two weeks.''
Remarks by billionaire investor George Soros, chairman of New York-based Soros Fund Management, after a speech in Tokyo also bolstered the yen. Soros said he saw some pressure from Japanese government officials to stop the yen from weakening further, Reuters reported today.
Bloomberg
Originally posted by tazadar
The reason the Fed stop reporting M3 is that they are hiding something. One thing we can expect for certain is hyperinflation of the money supply. GDP is growing annually around 3.5%, yet M3 is at about 10%. Where is the difference of these new money going to. Into stock markets.
The camps all have railroad facilities as well as roads leading to and from the detention facilities. Many also have an airport nearby. The majority of the camps can house a population of 20,000 prisoners. Currently, the largest of these facilities is just outside of Fairbanks, Alaska. The Alaskan facility is a massive mental health facility and can hold approximately 2 million people.
Source
Originally posted by worldwatcher
If Gates and Cheney are still shorting dollar as the earlier articles in this thread has stated, then they are losing The dollar has only gotten stronger over the past year and is currently near it's highest levels.
Dollar Heads for Biggest Weekly Drop Since July as Growth Slows
By Kabir Chibber and Ron Harui
Oct. 20 (Bloomberg) -- The dollar is poised for its steepest weekly loss against the yen since July on speculation the Federal Reserve will keep borrowing costs unchanged for a third month as the economy slows.
The U.S. currency has lost 1.1 percent this week as reports showed a contraction in manufacturing and industrial production. Fed policy maker President William Poole said yesterday ``inflation has become much more stable'' in recent years. The yen also rose this week as the Russian central bank said it will increase its holdings of the currency.
Bloomberg
Originally posted by Mdv2
Obviously, they see what is going to happen and therefore are taking precautionary measures.
Originally posted by BitRaiser
Such a currancy could be more than precautionary...
It could be an agressive attempt to kick the legs out from under the US ecconomy.
It would be damned effective too. Without the oil standard backing the US Dollar, it would become wildly devalued in a very short time. It could crash the dollar within hours of going live if OPEC desides to make it their oil trade standard (which I'm perty damned sure they would).
Originally posted by Mdv2
Iran and Iraq knew perfectly what the achilles heel of the US is, cannot defeat them militarily? Do it economically.