It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

USA vs North Korea

page: 1
0
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 15 2003 @ 08:57 AM
link   
US war expert have come to the conclusion that in a convential war with NK the USA would eventually come out with a total victory but only after around 1 million casualties and massive losses.

Doesnt look good does it!

More and more i think the only viable option against NK is a nuclear one, by that i mean small warheads taking out selected targets.
Conventional warhead could do this but i think to use small nuclear weapons would show NK that the USA is deadly serious.

What do you guys think?



posted on Oct, 15 2003 @ 09:36 AM
link   
*Throws a nuke at North Korea*

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM

*Watches Fulcrum the Cockroach crawl out of the ashes*

*Gives Fulcrum a BIG Hug*




I'm not racist Fulcrum. I dont want anyone nuking North Korea.

And anyways you said firstly that i wanted America to be nuked. Wheer'd u get that from?

Geez!

Anyways i'm sick of talking with u.

I gotta go out to nightclub real soon so i better get ready ;P

G'night ;P

[Edited on 17-10-2003 by DaRAGE]



posted on Oct, 16 2003 @ 11:36 PM
link   
1 million US casualties??? I would like to see a report of that. I can imagine that happening only if they launched a missle to the western portion of the US.

OR

Maybe 1 million casualties is correct if you include what NK would try doing to Japan and Seoul.



posted on Oct, 16 2003 @ 11:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Dreamz
1 million US casualties??? I would like to see a report of that. I can imagine that happening only if they launched a missle to the western portion of the US.

OR

Maybe 1 million casualties is correct if you include what NK would try doing to Japan and Seoul.


well last time we fought them, we lost 10's of thousands troops and their military is bigger and better now than it was then, they have about as many artillery and tanks as china and their troops would out number us by 500'000 and their troops are actually trained at a very high level.

[Edited on 16-10-2003 by namehere]



posted on Oct, 16 2003 @ 11:48 PM
link   
Cant remember but I think it was Jeff Rense site..that NK would come out way ahead in a confrontation with the US...somewhere around a million casualties...also that NK outweighed the US totally in power..hard to believe???



posted on Oct, 16 2003 @ 11:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by DaRAGE
Throw a nuke down a bug hole, you got a lot of dead bugs.


# you asshole!



The bug hole here is USA!



And same to you Kalistenics.. you are also one stupid mofo!

You people really arent no different that OBL..

SHAME ON YOU!




posted on Oct, 16 2003 @ 11:54 PM
link   
Here is the link....www.rense.com/general37/nkorr.htm



posted on Oct, 17 2003 @ 04:15 AM
link   
Well what would you do fulcrum if faced with a totally hostile country openly saying they would strike you if they could accuring nuclear weapons?
First strike is only real option! Unless USA want to get dragged into a horrific long and bloody war!



posted on Oct, 17 2003 @ 04:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kalistenics
Well what would you do fulcrum if faced with a totally hostile country openly saying they would strike you if they could accuring nuclear weapons?
First strike is only real option! Unless USA want to get dragged into a horrific long and bloody war!


NK has only said that it will strike at US pacific MILITARY BASES if US starts a build up of a forces for a war against NK.

That is a JUST FIRST STIKE!

US has no business in the whole pacific area.

US should and must only mind 'business' in the #ING AMERICAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




posted on Oct, 17 2003 @ 04:58 AM
link   
Good job Fulcrum! You da man!!
being american I do have to agree with you that America should spend more time concentrating on the Americas and less on the worries of the rest of the world.


Mark



posted on Oct, 17 2003 @ 04:58 AM
link   
Fulcrum.

I wasn't suggesting anything about the USA being nuked.

I was more inclined to the "the US would nuke NK way before having 1 million casualties in a conventional war".

That's what i was meaning. But still. People will die on both sides. The losses will be horrific. War is War. You can say all you want Fulcrum, swear at me or whatever. But the USA doesn't have more of a right than NK to have nuclear/chemical/biological weapons.

Double standards mean nothing to me. What's fair for one is fair for another.

But in war anything goes.



posted on Oct, 17 2003 @ 05:01 AM
link   
I think we should have a joint conference and political meetings with the UN to get the NKs to back off and cease their nuclear exploitation. If the UN backs the US and other nations like Japan, the option of disarming them gets more clout.

Fulcrum,
Chill man, lets get copasetic. When you get angry like this you look silly and really don't contribute to the topic. Focus bro, focus.

[Edited on 10-17-2003 by Cearbhall]



posted on Oct, 17 2003 @ 05:03 AM
link   
You all make me sick.. except Markos here..

Dont you understand that US has no right to be anywhere else than in USA.



Let alone kill or even worse nuke citizens of other nations?




posted on Oct, 17 2003 @ 05:06 AM
link   
Killing people is always bad..

Get that to your thick skulls!



But for now many of you here are talking like killing people or nuking them is a option..

None of you are any different than average North Korean.. they also have feelings and families.. think about it..

They are HUMANS!




posted on Oct, 17 2003 @ 05:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by Cearbhall
Fulcrum,
Chill man, lets get copasetic. When you get angry like this you look silly and really don't contribute to the topic. Focus bro, focus.

[Edited on 10-17-2003 by Cearbhall]



Yep I agree!
Fulcrum if you dont agree then make your point better than flaming us. What are the underlying reasons why we all "make you sick"?



posted on Oct, 17 2003 @ 05:15 AM
link   
Fulcrum. If i had it my way tehre would be no wars.

But there are. Countries get invaded. people war. People die.

There you have it.

Nothing can change war. Nothing can change death.

People will do what they want, leaders will do what they want, countries will do what they want. If some oppose then there will be war.

Life aint a pretty christmas present. Life does suck at times. You just gotta live with that and go on, do your thing, and live the rest of your life.



posted on Oct, 17 2003 @ 05:16 AM
link   
Fulcrum,
If the US held this "laissez-faire" idea of yours then the the world wouldn't be what it is today, it would probably be part of the Nazi Regime or worse. The Jews and other groups would all be probably wiped out. Perhaps even the US would of fallen. The US has a responsibility to the human race, for being the most powerful country, to stop these types of atrocities to mankind. Read some Theodore Roosevelt.



posted on Oct, 17 2003 @ 05:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by FULCRUM
Killing people is always bad..

Get that to your thick skulls!



But for now many of you here are talking like killing people or nuking them is a option..

None of you are any different than average North Korean.. they also have feelings and families.. think about it..

They are HUMANS!



They are also in much better physical shape than most Americans. If it was h2h combat North Korea would rule!!



posted on Oct, 17 2003 @ 05:35 AM
link   
mabye the general population but i dont think the american soilders are fat!



posted on Oct, 17 2003 @ 05:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by groingrinder

They are also in much better physical shape than most Americans. If it was h2h combat North Korea would rule!!




Thanks for the 'break'..



But seriously.. only 'legimate' targets for US are Canada and Mexico..

That is if they start to give you troubles..

But the intercontinental wars are criminal and unjust!








 
0
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join