It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Enkidu
Oops! My mistake. I did a comprehensive photo "analysis" of one of the lunar surface photos above, and found undeniable photographic PROOF of alien (possibly Atlanean) ruins! Is my face red. Compare it to the original. Rectilinear features are in yellow, blue arrows point to obvious anomalies such as strange colored craters, or flat impact craters on the SIDES of crater walls!
All of this is indicative of the billion year-old ruins of a sophisticated lunar mining operation.
Or it could be just any random lunar surface photo and me with a line tool and a lot of imagination...
Originally posted by wildbill
Heres one for you "OMEGA85".....
Originally posted by wildbill
"What the hell happened to our team of the SBOMR anyway?" and mostly,"why in the 'Hay Hell', haven't you tried to contact me?" The thread that you are running right now is so "BS" compared to what we were doing before, I refuse you to use any of the info I have gave you under Allred5923, I will get my own recruit's and go from there. You have ben around to appologize, and thats all I have been getting from you the MOD'S , I want to start my own research team and if I have to I will do it myself. If you decide to use the pic's or anything else I have found during our gathering, I will ask the Mods to remove it , or I will delete all the pic's and let you search on your own. Formerly, (ALLRED5923)
Originally posted by TheGoodDoctorFunk
I'm sorry. the 'paranoid ramblings' of other threads? I'm going to have to call you out on this one. Each and every one of the 'cases' presented here have been based on bepixeled images, artists concepts, tampered photographs, and bad, bad, bad science. From what I have read in the last five pages, you have searched the internet, muckling on to any theory about moon bases out there. You present them here while giving the minimum of input from yourself. At best, sir, your arguments for a moon base is speculative, and at worst, unsubstantiated.
source
Source
Okay, can you point out to me somewhere on the back side of the moon where there is evidence of such surface mining? Wait, these aren't the best photos. Try
These
Source
Or look at these images, courtesy of Wikepedia.
en.wikipedia.org...:Moon_PIA00304.jpg
en.wikipedia.org...:Moon_PIA00303.jpg
Those are both of the far side of the moon. As a note, the vertical lines are very nicely gemoetrical artifacts from piecing together the photos of the 1999 Lunar Prospector mission. The off-color streaks around each impact crater is the ejecta from said impact.
I'm not trying to cut anyone down, or ruin their mood. Just trying to dispell some unscientific thinking and, as always, denying ignorance.
Originally posted by 25cents
The horrid grammar and spelling tend to make me disbelieve everything that guy says.
by 25cents
The horrid grammar and spelling tend to make me disbelieve everything that guy says.
by LAES YVAN
Who are you talking about? I think in grammar school I learned that using a pronoun without first stating the noun is not acceptable. So who is "that" guy?
Originally posted by rocques22
Check it out and let me know what your input is
Originally posted by police_officer339
MAN!!!
Must be my name on here...
Everyone gets so emotional when I post even a complimentary posting..SHHHEESHH
Well Omega, I stand by your thought process and it stll fasinates me and I will continue to "google" to discover answers.
Lets try to remember that emotional responses to external stimuli deny any real discourse on any subject.
Originally posted by johnlear
Oh, ah, jra, just one more thing. The photo below, alleged to be 69-HC-431, alleging to show the Apollo 10 command module seen from the LM in orbit 60 miles above the moon (I've alway wondered why they used 60 miles if the moon has 1/6th the earths gravity) seems to show a thick blue line on the horizon of the moon which would indicate a lunar atmosphere much denser than proposed in the above information. What is your opinion?