It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sun Matrix: As I've already mentioned, you can dance around the issue all you want, but making assumptions and stating your opinions will not replace facts, not even when you disguise them as such.
One of the downfalls of the Bible is that it provides so many opportunities to be proven wrong.
Facts have to pass the test in my opening post.
Let me know if you ever come up with one.
One of the downfalls of the Bible is that it provides so many opportunities to be proven wrong.
Originally posted by mytym
I already gave you an example and you could not prove it to be factual. If I recall you used opinions and assumptions in an effort to prove your point. I indicated this to you, but you failed to acknowledge it. You then went on to ask for another example despite your inability to disprove the first one. In order to earn the right to disprove another example you must first disprove the first example. What is the point of having two examples when one already satisfies the requirement?
[edit on 22/4/06 by mytym]
If an objective truth exists then chances are the subjective truth will be identical to it. The objective truth can never evaporate once established. Objective truth is fact and facts do not change.
Originally posted by mytym
Mr Mxyztplk:
Sun Matrix asked me for one example of an opportunity that the Bible provides to be proven wrong. My example was the 120 age limit imposed by God on humans, despite many examples of humans living longer than this. He/She proceeded to use his/her opinions and assumptions to devise an alternative interpretation in an effort to avoid the contradiction. He/She then went on to deny that he/she had interpreted or assumed anything. Sun Matrix answered the question, but failed to prove the answer is factual and not merely his/her assumption, interpretation and opinion.
Here is the thread in question:
www.belowtopsecret.com...
Hope this helps.
Professing to be wise, they became fools
Romans 1:21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 ,
Originally posted by Sun Matrix
I guess you will be picketing the Da Vinci Code movie as it claims to be fact and clearly isn't.
HOW MUCH OF THIS NOVEL IS TRUE?
The Da Vinci Code is a novel and therefore a work of fiction. While the book's characters and their actions are obviously not real, the artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals depicted in this novel all exist (for example, Leonardo Da Vinci's paintings, the Gnostic Gospels, Hieros Gamos, etc.). These real elements are interpreted and debated by fictional characters. While it is my belief that some of the theories discussed by these characters may have merit, each individual reader must explore these characters' viewpoints and come to his or her own interpretations. My hope in writing this novel was that the story would serve as a catalyst and a springboard for people to discuss the important topics of faith, religion, and history.