Why don't you believe the official story?

Originally posted by HowardRoark
Just because it looke like a controlled demolition, doesn’t automatically mean that it was.

If “A” is like “B,” and “C” is like “B,” does not meant that “A” = “C.”

If you want to be like that, then we should ignore what you're saying too.

Unless the firefighters went in and checked all the columns' temperatures and looked for any structural failures or etc. and not just superficial exterior damage, then just because they said the building looked pretty beat up didn't mean it was about to collapse straight down onto itself like an implosion (and I said "like" here where I mean it was an implosion ).

[edit on 7-4-2006 by bsbray11]

Here are over 150 reasons to doubt the official story. It's all jst a little too tidy to believe anyway!

thewebfairy.com...