It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by projectvxn
You may be right but many independent experiments have been done on the issue of remote viewing. All had negative results.
Originally posted by kevintorvalds
And finally, I've been watching a lot of movies lately, and I'm finding all sorts of weird things in them. Just writers randomly throwing stuff in to make the movie more "realistic"?
Originally posted by undo
Kevin,
Oh the things we could discuss on the topic of the bible!
Originally posted by projectvxn
Thank you, but their website was more than informative.
Originally posted by dominicus
Here's my theory section I would like to add and I hope the OP is still checking into this thread.
Originally posted by projectvxn
And I am stunned we have made it this far.
Originally posted by kevintorvalds
Oh, it gets better
near perfect dark material (this would absorb 99.9% light, which means invisibility, as sight is based on reflection of light)
and here's an interesting one... they're finally bringing back the ancients' practice of species splicing (if indeed there was such a practice... still not entirely convinced, but leaning towards the convinced side of things):
in·vis·i·ble /ɪnˈvɪzəbəl/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[in-viz-uh-buhl] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective
1. not visible; not perceptible by the eye