It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OneGodJesus
Could it be they are afraid of backlash?
--snip--
I want to know if there is in fact a conspiracy to hijack the religion that I remember the course teaching or if it is in fact a violent religion.
fordham.edu
The decision given by the Shaikh ar-Ramli [a great Cairo legal authority, d. 1596], by the Shaikh al-Islam [the Muslim religious authority in Constantinople], and by the learned scholars whose decrees can hardly be written down here, may be worded as follows: "It is forbidden to the tolerated peoples living on Muslim territory to clothe themselves in the same manner as the chiefs, the scholars, and the nobles. They should not be allowed to clothe themselves in costly fabrics which have been cut in the modes which are forbidden to them, in order that they may not offend the sensibilities of poor Muslims and in order that their faith in their religion should not be shaken by this. [Poor Muslims may regret their faith when they see how well-dressed the Christians and Jews are.]
"They should not be permitted to employ mounts like the Muslims. They must use neither saddles, nor iron-stirrups, in order to be distinguished from the true believers. They must under no circumstance ride horses because of the noble character of this animal. The Most-High has said [Qu'ran 8:62]: 'And through powerful squadrons [of horses] through which you will strike terror into your own and God's enemies.' [A verse of the Qu'ran makes a good support for a law. Verses may even be torn out of their context.]
--snip--
"It is no longer permitted them to put themselves, with respect to their houses, on an equal footing with the dwellings of their Muslim neighbors, and still less to build their buildings higher. If they are of the same height, or higher, it is incumbent upon us to pull them down to a size a little less than the houses of the true believers. This conforms to the word of the Prophet: 'Islam rules, and nothing shall raise itself above it.' This is also in order to hinder them from knowing where our weak spots are and in order to make a distinction between their dwellings and ours.
"They are forbidden to build new churches, chapels, or monasteries in any Muslim land. We should destroy everything that is of new construction in every place, such as Cairo, for instance, founded under the Muslim religion, for it is said in a tradition of Umar: 'No church shall be built in Islam.' They shall no longer be permitted to repair the parts of these [post-Islamic] buildings which are in ruins. However, the old buildings [of pre-Islamic times] which are found in a land whose population had embraced Islam need not be destroyed. They shall not, however, be enlarged by means of repairs or otherwise. In case the tolerated peoples [Jews, Christians, etc.] act contrary to these provisions we will be obliged to destroy everything that has been added to the original size of the building. [Only pre-Islamic churches and synagogues may be repaired; new ones must be torn down.]
Originally posted by OneGodJesus
I want to get to the bottom of why Christians get blasted pretty regular when one of our number steps out and inserts his foot in his mouth (mostly by Christians) but Muslims don't do this. Why?
[edit on 17/2/06 by OneGodJesus]
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
B) Those who speak against the ones who go nutzo will be called an apostate, and then they will be targetted for death. It doesn't pay for a Muslim to speak up.
Originally posted by daedalas
The ottoman empire was extremely tolerant of other religions, even in a time when killing people because of their religion was not only exceptable but encouraged.
Originally posted by Beachcoma
I think the American media is following an agenda of fear.
Originally posted by Beachcoma
Crazy, angry muslims in the middle east unhappy at the perceived double-standards between America's treatment of Israel as compared to some middle-eastern states provides that 'threat' which the main-stream media happily amplifies by showing every single negative action from muslims while quietly ignoring anything good the muslims do.
Originally posted by Paul of Nisbis
Whereas a true war on terror would require a war on Islam itself and the destruction of Mecca and Medina at minimum.
Originally posted by Nakash
Split second Mecca blows up you can kiss Islam goodbye. No Islam=no Terrorism. They will all then convert to Judaism,Christianity,Hinduism,etc. World peace at last. Alluh Akbar!
Originally posted by Nakash
Split second Mecca blows up you can kiss Islam goodbye. No Islam=no Terrorism. They will all then convert to Judaism,Christianity,Hinduism,etc. World peace at last. Alluh Akbar!
mohammed was engaded with a girl of the age of 6
maried here when see was 9 .
There is no basis for this in the Q'uran.