weird photo near viaduct

I have taken a hue saturation of the blue pic in relation to 'the boy'. You can see something is there its different from the background.

firmbeliever can you post the pick without the red line, I was thinking the black shape looks like a dog, closer to the camera...

Dan

I only have a digital camera (well it's my dads but I like photography more so I take most photos) Does digital affect this or is it the same. I would have thought it would be better but the main problem for me is when you are taking pics of wildlife e.g birds, it takes about 2-3 secs for it to process. Id rather get a proper photographers camera but they're expensive & by the look of this, it doesnt matter.

I don't know how to, I can e-mail you the other pic which is basically the same without the line if u want

Yeah please do. You have got me hooked on this one... it could be our own mini-serpo!!!
lol

Thanks
Dan

oooh #uc#

I got a pic i took just like this, with a littleman in the tree and he lookes just like that

bere with me a moment or 2 whilst I dig it out!!!

IMHO - it looks like a rat running up a tree - see this blow up - no manipulation / filtering yet :

external image

not how there is brush behind and below it - no contact to the ground

fixed image link


[edit on 2-8-2006 by worldwatcher]

What does IMHO mean? soz i'm quite new, Ur link is unclickable by the way.

Back on in an hour cuz my slothing dad wants to use the pc

Did u find those photos of urs?

owww flippin eck!, I can't find the cd it was on ...its quite old

I will search on......
I'm pretty shure I've looked that batch of pics recently , then again..that might have been a dream, I get like that somtimes.

I see some of u guys are on now. Nything? I just sent u an e-mail Dan by the way, don't know if u got it

Firmbeliever has asked me to post this pic. Him and his mate took it in a graveyard tonight. He has no thoughts on what it might be but he wondered what we all thought!
Dan

Thanks again, I've gotta learn how to use this stuff. This is the only misty pic out of about 60, alot of the rest have orbs but there not as convincing as this.

Hey Ape,
Just had athought... if its not making contact with the ground then doesn't that mean its hovering or... floating...

Hmm makes you think.

Dan

bigdanprice, that whitish 'smoke' picture is just fog. I know for a fact because I have taken similar pictures myself:


I personally believe nothing paranormal is going on here.


And another such fog image.

I'm tired of orb and fog pictures. If you want a convincing and real ghost picture, you have to learn NOT TO USE A FLASH.

As for the 'boy', does anybody seen an even more clear sort of weird scarecrow pumpkinman directly to his right? he is wearing all brown and has a sort of weird Nightmare Before Christmas kind of greyish head.

Thus proving that if you look hard enough, you can see whatever you want to see. Seen this happen in lots of pictures. Your brain naturally tries to put colors and shapes together and make them into something familiar. It is probably just a blue bag stuck in a tree, or a blue spraypaint signifying they plan on taking the tree down, and your mind fills in the rest.

Or take another picture to prove that the blue thing isn't there any more at least...

[edit on 8-2-2006 by Yarcofin]

I totally agree Yarcoffin,I was putting it up for firmbeliever who doesnt know how yet.

I also agree with your assement of the boy picture, but I think that we need to hold our selves to high standards of proof, its easy to just dismiss things, i prefer to stay open minded.

Cheers

Dan

Wait a sec, it's clear as day down here in the south, there's a full moon, stars & not a spec of mist, this phanomena doesn't occur in the 50+ other pics.

I believe in keeping an open mind too, but I have seen enough orb and mist pictures to dismiss them without having to really put any effort in any more, for the simple fact that they are all the same. I have purposefully recreated them myself and I can create them whenever I want, so there aren't any ghosts involved.

Here is a brightened version of the fog photo:



Just a really bad picture of a concrete/stone walkway and a tree. Sort of amazes me why so many ghost pictures are taken of nothing, or pointed at the ground for no reason.

Wait a sec, it's clear as day down here in the south, there's a full moon, stars & not a spec of mist

Just because you can't see it with your eyes, doesn't mean there isn't moisture in the air that light reflects off of like this. Ghosts don't put that dew on your grass in the morning, it has to fall from somewhere .

If you stare at it long enough, you can see whatever you want to see. I see a giant skeleton-like creature that takes up the entire shot, myself.

[edit on 8-2-2006 by Yarcofin]

I'm goin bed, I can't believe it, this is my first ever day of proper investigating & even people of the same kind can't agree that maybe there actually was something paranormal there. Why do we bother?

firmbeliever don't get discouraged so quickly, is it your goal to prove the paranormal to every person in this world? if it is, i'd say aim for convincing just a few. You'll never convince everyone and believers of the paranormal tend to be just as skeptical as none believers when presented with pictures. It's rather hard to prove the paranormal with just a pic, most people rely on other senses in addition to just visual to be convinced of what they are experiencing.