It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mexican troops in Texas!

page: 4
1
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 27 2006 @ 12:01 AM
link   
Hello Friends:

Had anyone had read what it say in the first paragraht of the news report?
it reads-armed confrontation but no shoots were fired??

To me to be a armed confrotation the has to be a gun fight!!!



posted on Jan, 27 2006 @ 08:31 AM
link   
There are several other reports form border patrol and Texas Highway patrol about shots being fired in other incidents.



posted on Jan, 27 2006 @ 09:45 AM
link   
The mexicans have some brass ones these days. Its time we dealt with this situation once and for all. The govt isnt going to do squat about it with all the PC lobbyists buzzing around handing out money like candy so its going to be up to the people to make them.



posted on Jan, 28 2006 @ 01:17 AM
link   
NEWS FLASH: drugs have been smuggled from mexico into the us for decades, there is nothing new here.btw this isnt the mexican military for those basement-life users



posted on Jan, 30 2006 @ 08:01 PM
link   
The Mexican Govt. supports ILLEGAL immagration, they support their troops coming across the border to help, and they support the DRUG money from running them (DRUGS) across the border. The answer is simple, any Mexican troops crossing the border should be shot on site. This is an invasion of our country. More so...Mexican want to come here, their Govt. is willing to help them break OUR LAWS, then lets invade. Mexico has oil...Whether you want to believe it or not, OIL will be the prevaling currenct in a few years. The liberals and environmentalists won't let us drill here...So lets take over Mexico, they want to come here anyway. Take their oil, and call it a win-win situation. Our need for oil is a NATIONAL SECURITY issue. The Mexicans, including their Govt. want them to be able to come here...FINE...LET US ANNEX them, contol their oil, and we all win. OTHERWISE...SHOOT EVERY S.O.B. THAT IS COMING ACROSS THE BORDER!!



posted on Jan, 30 2006 @ 08:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by CSRules
So lets take over Mexico, they want to come here anyway. Take their oil, and call it a win-win situation.


uuhh, you took over Mexico decades ago, the US also controls Mexico´s oil, where have you been?



posted on Jan, 31 2006 @ 07:44 AM
link   
CS echoed what I have been saying in another thread about illegal immigration. We cannot stop it. We cannot build a wall, or electric fence, or gun turrets, or whatever else you blood thirsty rednecks wanna do.

Why not just absorb Mexico and bring them everything we love as Americans? We love their food, their weather, their climate, their art decor, and pretty much every aspect of their culture...except that darned poverty. IT is also worth noting that US business ventures (I wont call it Imperialism) is a huge reason most latin american economies are so inflated. They come here because US influence has ruined their economies. They are very rich in resources, from oil, to minerals, to tourism. Why not make Mexico our new biggest state?
We are spending billions on regime change overseas; On people that dont even want it! Why not do this to our nearest neighbor? I bet most Mexicans would embrace the idea.

In summary, we should make Mexico part of ourbeloved union. We should give them our much better standard of living, and they would in turn offer a WELCOME addition to our culture, rather than the illegal one.

MEXIMERICA!



posted on Jan, 31 2006 @ 08:52 AM
link   
Makes me wish I lived on the border in texas so I could grab my barett 50 Cal and take off some mexican army heads. GIVE OUT OF MY COUNTRY!

Blam!

Train



posted on Jan, 31 2006 @ 10:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by DaFunk13

.

I bet most Mexicans would embrace the idea.

In summary, we should make Mexico part of ourbeloved union. We should give them our much better standard of living, and they would in turn offer a WELCOME addition to our culture, rather than the illegal one.

MEXIMERICA!

I hope that one day its your I.D they get a hold of,after all they break the law to get here, they break OUR laws by driving,and they do steal I.D from Americans they can stay in mexico and fight for there own freedom!!



posted on Jan, 31 2006 @ 01:19 PM
link   
Deadcats,

I would love to hear your explaination of why Mexico has such a shattered economy, and why you believe a majority of mexicans would rather risk life and limb to get here illegally, rather than fix their own system, as I am pretty sure you have no idea what you are talking about.

Care to prove me wrong?



posted on Jan, 31 2006 @ 01:43 PM
link   
need I say more
www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 31-1-2006 by deadcatsrule]

[edit on 31-1-2006 by deadcatsrule]



posted on Jan, 31 2006 @ 02:35 PM
link   
And what does a thread (which I have seen, by the way) about mexican drug traffiking have to do with illegal immigration?

My post stated that IMO we should absorb Mexico into our beloved union...call it a win-win.

You call me a terrorist and then post a link to a thread about illegal international drug running?

Are you even old enough to vote?



posted on Jan, 31 2006 @ 02:50 PM
link   
come up for air and think for a moment. the mex gov will never give up its drug money and we can not take a country by force,there for making mexico a state is just a wast of time and money,but why not they have taken our country



posted on Feb, 1 2006 @ 08:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by DaFunk13
In summary, we should make Mexico part of ourbeloved union. We should give them our much better standard of living, and they would in turn offer a WELCOME addition to our culture, rather than the illegal one.

MEXIMERICA!


How would you propose Mexico join the U.S.? As a single, huge state, or as 31 smaller states?

Also, using a term like "Mexicana" implies a merger, not simply the U.S. absorbing Mexico. A merger would, obviously, destroy the soverignty of the U.S. (and Mexico, of course) forever.



posted on Feb, 1 2006 @ 10:47 PM
link   
It certainly is a serious problem. imho, it's set-up by the NWO controllers toward further planned evil ends.

The thing I've been trying to find out about is whether the rumors of Chinese military in uniform being with the Mexican army in uniform in cross border forays and probing efforts.

There must be a raft of folks connected to forum members who are or who know Border Patrol personnel whom we could query quietly and get a straw poll about whether that's true, or not.

I wonder how many might fit that category?



posted on Feb, 2 2006 @ 07:54 AM
link   
I have no idea how the actual layout of the thing could work. I just know that economically, a union is the only way we could ever stop our problem. The only way Mexico will ever have a strong economy is if US companies stop raping the people. We need to reinvest some of those profits into the communities we build them in. WE pay them just enough to be happy, and no money gets reinvested into the mexican economy. Its so damn inflated they are flooding here to take dishwashing and fruit picking jobs for $5.15.

If they became part of the US, they could all vote.
They could all be in charge of their own freedom.

Prez. Fox is a puppet to US interests, and at the same time encourages his citizens to get jobs here illegally, and send the money back home. Its a screwy situation economically. I just think the only logical solution would be complete assimilation. You guys keep saying they come here and have their "anchor babies", and dont learn the language, and they toker jobs. Why not give everyone a fair shot at freedom, and at the same time we can share the things they offer without the weight on our conscience (or at least the conscience of those who understand)?

If not a union, at least a little more of a symbiotic relationship, rather than the parasitic stance we take now.

Someone more versed in foreign policy would answer the technical questions better than I.

[edit on 2-2-2006 by DaFunk13]



posted on Feb, 2 2006 @ 10:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by DaFunk13
"anchor babies", and dont learn the language, and they toker jobs. Why not


spelling?



posted on Feb, 2 2006 @ 10:45 AM
link   
Are you referring to the "toker jobs" thing? Its a joke. Say it with an ignorant, southern, hillbilly accent and its kinda funny. It obviously went way over your head buddy. Sorry to confuse you.

Glad to see you are taking grammar and spelling a little more seriously.



posted on Feb, 2 2006 @ 12:24 PM
link   
So wanting to put the military on the border with machine gun positions and maybe some light armor is a "blood thirsty redneck" idea. I take offense to that, you seem to have nothing but utter contempt for southerners. Its not a racial issue, which is how I think you see it. Up until a few weeks ago, the Mexican govt was giving maps of our border patrol positions to make it easier for illegals to get here. They say they arent doing it anymore, but do you buy that? I sure dont, its complete BS, and they will continue to play our country for fools until we step up and put the military on the border, give orders to shoot at these people(warning shots first of course), and take back our border and continue to maintain order there. Thats my position as an American, not just some "blood thirsty redneck" as you put it.

[edit on 2/2/2006 by ludaChris]



posted on Feb, 2 2006 @ 12:30 PM
link   
Utter contempt for southernors? We have an enormous hispanic community in my home town. You southernors dont hold a monopoly on our illegal immigration "problem." I understand the stance of those who dont comprehend the economic implications of this beast. I know, you dont hate mexicans, you just want them here legally right?

My stance on immigration has absolutely nothing to do with what part of the country you live in. We are all Americans. I promise you we have just as many idiot rednecks in Michigan as ya'll do in Texas, or Arizona, or whatever. Do you have anything to say pertaining to the actual thread?




top topics



 
1
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join