attack on monday the 23rd

I won't believe any of this unless someone can prove to me that FEMA will be conducting drills in these 6 cities on the 22nd.

I do believe that there is a high risk of attack in the near future. Monday is a possible day but if something happens I won't be giving any credit to these predictions.

Given al-qaedas track record of election tampering I would certainly be watching that day with interest.

IIve just read all the post from everyone..and this is very freaking intresting.

I am alittle concerned since i do live in maryland..so i am pretty close to D.C

There is somethiing wierd about this new threat.


I kind of believe something could really happen..didnt he say the next attack they do would be in the U.S.

tHAT alone is scarry.

hey i propose a question?

where will george bush be at on monday?

it just so happened on 911 he was all the way in florida.

I wonder were he would be if something did go down?

lets find out..come on ats do your research!

Bush is in Austria tomorrow. Is that far enough away?

j/k

Originally posted by Lanotom
Bush is in Austria tomorrow. Is that far enough away?

j/k

ooo i just realized you were joking.

But seriously can anyone find out were bush will be tomarrow.

If he escapes this attack i wouldnt be surprised.

[edit on 21-1-2006 by MagicPriest420]

The president will travel from Topeka to Manhattan Kansas, where he will deliver a Landon Lecture at Kansas State University.

www.kansascity.com...


Added Kansas, didn't want people to think New York.

[edit on 21-1-2006 by Lanotom]

Originally posted by Lanotom
The president will travel from Topeka to Manhattan, where he will deliver a Landon Lecture at Kansas State University.

www.kansascity.com...

I have a question.

What time is he leaving topeka kansas tomarrow?

This might help us figure when the attacks will be.

If these are nuclear attacks...how much devastation can we expect?

Isnt there style to be simultaneous with the attacks.

I think this topic is worth every bit of concern.


wow..he is supposed go to new york..now wouldnt that make good press on cnn.."presidents near escape from disaster"

I can see it now...i think it will happen...if not im,lets be prepared for worst.

I never really saw another us election..this could be the step to keep bush in power..with a disaster like this...we wont recover for a long time..we will neeed the aid of other countries..how many will help us?

this is very serious..

oh dang i did it again..i thot u said manhattan new york..i just saw you put kansas.

That still doesnt make it better.

I need to see that list of citys again.

Does anyone have a chart or graph that displays the effects of nukes?

this is very humbling.

Hey, read my first post in this thread. If FEMA was scheduled to be in any of these cities tomorrow then I would worry, but since they are not then leave it as a fun rumor.

Originally posted by Lanotom
Hey, read my first post in this thread. If FEMA was scheduled to be in any of these cities tomorrow then I would worry, but since they are not then leave it as a fun rumor.

I dont think that really matters.

Unless they have previous knowledge of these attacks,why would they be already there prepared for anything to happen?


Does bush have any military bunkers located in the areas surronding kansas,were he can go incase of emergency.


If he did survive he would need to stay away from the radiation and fallout,am i correct?

Originally posted by MagicPriest420

Does bush have any military bunkers located in the areas surronding kansas,were he can go incase of emergency.

Hmmmm.... let me think, Kansas?
I'm sure he'll be safe.



www.dudehisattva.com...

Thanks for answering my question

I was being serious..and i guess you were to?

Lets try this again.

Thanks for answering my question

I was being serious..and i guess you were to?

Lets try this again.

Originally posted by PopeyeFAFL
The Papineau-Leblanc bridge from Laval (North shore) to Montréal is a suspension bridge:

bilan.usherbrooke.ca...

Actually it's a Cable Stayed Span Bridge. There are no Suspension bridges in Montreal anymore. There was one once, but it was rebuilt in 1919, because it could no longer hold the loads it was required to hold.

Here are the differences between a Suspension, and a Cable Stayed Span.

A typical cable stayed bridge (illustration #1 & 2) is a continuous girder with one or more towers erected above piers in the middle of the span. From these towers, cables stretch down diagonally (usually to both sides) and support the girder.

www.matsuo-bridge.co.jp...

Of all the bridge types in use today, the suspension bridge allows for the longest spans. At first glance the suspension and cable-stayed bridges may look similar, but they are quite different. Though suspension bridges are leading long span technology today, they are in fact a very old form of bridge. Some primitive examples of suspension bridges use vines and ropes for cables.

A typical suspension bridge (illustration #1) is a continuous girder with one or more towers erected above piers in the middle of the span. The girder itself it usually a truss or box girder though in shorter spans, plate girders are not uncommon. At both ends of the bridge large anchors or counter weights are placed to hold the ends of the cables.

The main cables are stretched from one anchor over the tops of the tower(s) and attached to the opposite anchor. The cables pass over a special structure known as a saddle (illustration #2.) The saddle allows the cables to slide as loads pull from one side or the other and to smoothly transfer the load from the cables to the tower.

www.matsuo-bridge.co.jp...

[edit on 1/21/2006 by Zaphod58]

[edit on 1/21/2006 by Zaphod58]

Could you imagine if Al-CIA-DUH actually pulled off an attack on various cities a week before the presidents state of the union address. WOW!



He'd have to cancel his SOTU address.

I posted a thread in BTS a few weeks ago about a dream that I had about the Golden Gate Bridge Collapsing.
If anyone is interested here is the link.

www.belowtopsecret.com...'

Can you just imagine if this actually did happen or when and if terrorists do something similar what people and governments would do? i reckon all nations supporting terrorism like Iran for one and others would be insto nuked for sure, our subs would nuke em wouldn't even have to send planes, then a no mercy war on terrorists like we would deploy all illegal weps on them bio, chem and more nukes prob mini ones to all places were they are suspected of hiding. i am also sure the country that was hit would gather huge support from allied country's and a WW2 style hunt and destroy missions would start oh dear hiding with civilians boom all dead tanks mow houses down deary me the gloves have come off and thats what we would do I'm sure we did it in WW2 that we know...

At moment we are trying to keep casualties to minimum which hampers partly the search and destroy as too many rules and things need to be followed.

I had a dream where all of these city attacks were fake and that Osama bin laden had offered a truce because the US was killing too many of his top operatives. I wonder what we're going to talk about after Osama is dead and gone.

Russian subs? Divine retribution? Quack African prophets from Tennessee? Sorry- that plot is going straight to video.

I'm not closed to the idea that Bin Laden will make a move. It wouldn't be very media-savvy to threaten us and then let nothing happen, and the Canadian election is good timing- it would be a great opportunity to fire one across America's bow and try to change election turnouts for us in November. He could designate areas dominated by either side to try and throw turnout off, and if the elections went strangely then there'd be all kinds of hell to pay and probably plenty of allegations that it was all a CIA rouse.

I just don't think that that site has any predictive value- not least of all because even if there is a God, I can't think of anyone- least of all any Christians, who he'd likely be interested in speaking to.

The Russians aren't going to hit us with nukes on Monday... in fact NOBODY is going to hit us with nukes on monday- I'll give BIG odds on that bet. Maybe truck bombs or some kind of improvised hazardous chemical spill is about the best I'd expect out of them, unless they've done they've done an uncharacteristically good job of doing their homework.

Some supervillain this Bin Laden is. My brothers and I could inflict more trauma than he has with nothing more than case of beer and some golf clubs.

I still want to know why it is that everyone KNOWS they have 40 suitcase nukes in the US, but they're only planning on using 5 or 6 of them. Wouldn't it make a lot MORE sense to use them all? I mean if you don't use them we're gonna be even more determined to find them, and you're gonna lose the ability to use them later.