It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Produkt
And to add to suzy's post, always deny what the definition of opinion and twisting the fact's is. For if you do, the gullible will see you as true.
Originally posted by Produkt
I've already replied to that thread.
In the case of dna, any agency wanting your dna can get it every time you get a blood sample taken at the doctor's office. When you piss in a cup. Break into your house and take a sample of your hair off a brush or your head while your sleeping!
..
What I did say is that your so called evidence that this will be done is nothing more then opinion
a link to the entire story, AND your opinion, twist or take on the news item.
Originally posted by soficrow
Originally posted by Produkt
And to add to suzy's post, always deny what the definition of opinion and twisting the fact's is. For if you do, the gullible will see you as true.
Just to clarify - the word from Produkt is:
DNA files can't be lost, misplaced, stolen, or otherwise appropriated.
Even if the unthinkable happened - no one will do anything nasty with your personal information - DNA, financial or otherwise.
It is OKAY if all your personal information is collected - up to and including your DNA profile - because there is no proof whatsoever that anyone anywhere is creating any master files that might be misused in any coordinated manner.
Nothing to see here. Move along now.
So does this mean some, who don't want their DNA collected, 'could' still get these jobs? Who would/could 'they' be? NWO head honchoes?
Originally posted by suzy ryan
Is Produkt the herald of the death of ATS? Right now I'm too tired to think beyond this question and the answer, to my mind is, yes.
Originally posted by Produkt
Older officer's would already be known and established and trusted. New recruits wanting to advance their career's on oversea jobs should offer up dna. Things do go wrong. Atleast this way the new recruits can be identified if found dead or have their butts saved if implicated in a crime. Another thing to look at, does that article say they are going to do this, or from what you posted, just wanting to do this? Wanting and doing are two different thing's.
As for pet's, I can understand a mandatory tagging. Sometime's I wish something like this was done in the USA. There are alot of strays and alot of lost pets or abandoned pets. With tagging, you know which are the stray's, which are the abandoned and which are the lost and can then take the needed action's concerning each case. I fail to see the harm in that.
If you feel there is evil behind any of it, could you please point out your source's that would lead you to conclude there is evil behind it?