It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ConspiracyNut23
It’d be nice if you guys would put reference threads on here, but they are usually easy enough to find.
www.abovetopsecret.com... (first post)
Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
I know 5 firefighters personally as well as 1 EMT/reserve fire-fighter. Not one has ever heard this term either...
Edit: Sorry, meant to say all West Coast too.
Originally posted by Lanotom
I have also contacted companies on the west coast just in case it was native to a particular area of the country and the reply is the same, an astounding no!
So please be a sport and tell me where you get your information.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Hey guys, I have a suggestion and a couple of questions.
First the suggestion. I think it would be a lot better if you could make those podcasts more user friendly. I don't see any way to fast forward or rewind the mp3s. It would make it a lot easier, and it could bring more people to listen to these podcasts, if you set them up so they are more user friendly. When the show was about 70% done, I stopped the podcast to see if I could bring back the bar to one of the topics you were discussing, but it didn't work.
Originally posted by Muaddib
First the suggestion. I think it would be a lot better if you could make those podcasts more user friendly. I don't see any way to fast forward or rewind the mp3s. It would make it a lot easier, and it could bring more people to listen to these podcasts, if you set them up so they are more user friendly. When the show was about 70% done, I stopped the podcast to see if I could bring back the bar to one of the topics you were discussing, but it didn't work.
Originally posted by parrhesia
That should not be a problem, Muaddib.
What are you using to listen to the podcasts? Are you letting them stream? Or downloading? Either way you should be able to stop, rewind, fast forward, etc. I stream most of the time and can do all of this.
Originally posted by Muaddib
i have windows media player set up to play videos, mp3s, etc. All I do is click on the link and media player starts.
by Muaddib:
First the suggestion. I think it would be a lot better if you could make those podcasts more user friendly. I don't see any way to fast forward or rewind the mp3s. It would make it a lot easier, and it could bring more people to listen to these podcasts, if you set them up so they are more user friendly. When the show was about 70% done, I stopped the podcast to see if I could bring back the bar to one of the topics you were discussing, but it didn't work.
by theyseeall:
one question:
how are the two amigos pod-casting together???
are they using a phone???
thanks...
Originally posted by 12m8keall2c
They're using Skype (Internet Telephony)
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
I would podcast a reply if I could, but I'm not set up to be one of the pod people yet. I hope you still have the patience for text - a couple of quick thoughts regarding some points you raised:
* It's interesting how Jones' is being handled by the worldwide MSM. They keep talking about his "new theory", basically attempting to imply that he is a lone nut. There is never any mention of the enormous 9-11 truth movement that has been teeming just under the radar of the general public for 4 years.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
* You mentioned that Silverstein's "pull it" comment has been shown to be used by firefighters, in addition to the terms "pull out" and "pull back". I still haven't seen anything to support this. If you could link me up to something that shows this, I'd be much obliged. Even on ATS, the esteemed ZeddicusZulZorander has stated:
www.abovetopsecret.com... (first post)
Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
I know 5 firefighters personally as well as 1 EMT/reserve fire-fighter. Not one has ever heard this term either...
Edit: Sorry, meant to say all West Coast too.
And ATS member Lanotom (of Prophet Yahweh fame) investigated it as well:
Originally posted by Lanotom
I have also contacted companies on the west coast just in case it was native to a particular area of the country and the reply is the same, an astounding no!
So please be a sport and tell me where you get your information.
That's just a couple.
Actually, in the terminology of firefighting and such... "pull it" means to remove the firefighting crews and let the building burn, make no attempt to save it. It does not mean to pull the building down.
quote: Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Actually, in the terminology of firefighting and such... "pull it" means to remove the firefighting crews and let the building burn, make no attempt to save it. It does not mean to pull the building down.
*bangs head*
People....read what the wise SO said many many months ago.
I was born into and raised in a family of firefighters.
He is NOT making things up.
WTC
Hello, we all watched on TV, the buildings were hit with large aircrafts flying fast, filled with tons of fuel.
The impact of the aircraft damaged the buildings, but the jets fuel was the killer.
The fires started after impact raged out of control, weakened the supports for the floors above and below impact, which failed and we all saw what happened next.
A fire cheif freind of mine who I motorcycle ride with told me he attened a fire safety seminar in May. The highlight of the seminar was on newer conctruction multi level structure fires.
He pointed out to me, the next time you are in Wal-Mart or Home Depo, look at the ceilings. Look at the construction, flying girder or flying bridge with pole assembly. This is pretty much the same setup as the WTC floors were constructed, but with more steel. The seminar noted that when a fire is in a building with this type of construction, be aware of structure failure.
Fire heats the steal, the steal expands and bends from gravity and breaks away from its mounts. This is what happened at the WTC.
9/11 was a very sad day, I realize that a lot of things happened quickly that day as the world watched, but I just cannot even begin to think that a city safety inspector or engineer would allow explosives in any building for future demolition while occupied, that just does not happen!
john
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
* You mentioned Val's post where she conducted an energy assessment of the fires showing that the buildings could have collapsed from that alone. Did her calculations indicate that the buildings could have collapsed to the very ground and pulverized all that concrete, or only that the collapse could have been initiated? Can you link me up to that?
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
* The above point affects the issue which you raised concerning the logistics of placing all the explosives. If Val has shown that the kinetic energy of the descending "caps" alone was enough to collapse the buildings, pulverize all the concrete into dust, and expand the huge dust clouds to such a volume, then such a finding vastly reduces the amount of explosives or other column cutting agents needed. If the principle works for fire, it works for explosives. i.e. If a collapse at a single point in a tower can destroy it entirely, then cutting agents would also only need to be placed at a single point, or a couple of points in the buildings, letting gravity do the rest, rather than having to rig up the entire building with TNT.
Great podcast guys, I enjoyed it immensely.
Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
Sounds like streaming (listening as it's downloading). Try this.
Start the mp3 and then pause. Watch the bar at the bottom (the show length bar) and you should see it moving as more of the show downloads.
Let the whole show download and THEN play it. You will be able to do everything (stop, rewind, etc) that you want to.
Originally posted by Springer
The "Pull it" comment is a common phrase on the EAST Coast with firefighters, the two or three people you quote all mention they investigated WEST coast. I have been told this by people who are close to firefighters on the East Coast. Beyond that I know nothing about the phrase.
Regarding what she worked out: She calculated whether or not the fires that burned could have been hot enough to degrade/melt the steel enough to cause it to fail.
[...]
Based on these calculations she determined that YES the fire would be hot enough, by a fair margin, to "melt the structural components of the buildings. She did this using strict scientific method and precise calculus.
Regardless of the amount of explosives it's still one HECK OF JOB even if you cut the amount of explosive in half. These buildings were HUGE and very well built. The amount of explosives isn't so much the point as the SURVEYS required to select the EXACT points of the structural joints you have to place the explosives for them to work. Then you have cut the concrete away to place the directional charges against the steel re-bar. It's the re-bar you have to cut on order to drop the building and the concrete can't be in the way or it will insulate the re-bar from most of the pressure from the explosive charges.
Is it possible it was done before the attacks? Sure it is. Is it likely? Not IMHO. People would have noticed all that work going on....security professionals would have been all over people cutting into the support structures and planting EXPLOSIVES.
It's a HUGE mystery to me now that we have solid evidence that there was molten steel present at the site after 9/11. That's the big deal in my mind.