It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by shire19
Originally posted by kozmo
NOBODY, citizens of the US included, strive for innocent people to die.
Then you dont know much about Mankind and its Human nature.
Anyway, I wouldnt put it past the US Gov't to do something like this, wheter it be for testing purposes or frustration to clear places quickly.
They did it in Vietnam, why not Iraq?
Originally posted by Cornelia
www.rainews24.rai.it...
This is a very serious message.
Cornelia
Looking at the images of the corpses on the film, i must say are so shocking and upsetting, there skin is burned, but there clothes are not, this definetly raises a lot of serious questions, are the U S and Britain Covering up the use of Napalm in Iraq?
Originally posted by Dronetek
Oh yeah. It makes perfect sense to assume Americans over the men who openly slay innocent people by the hundreds so they can get into heaven.
[edit on 7-11-2005 by Dronetek]
Originally posted by BomSquad
Also, why would the US/UK need to cover up the use of Napalm? Has it been outlawed? This is not a sarcastic remark, I honestly don't know the answer....
Originally posted by iamian
Originally posted by Cornelia
www.rainews24.rai.it...
This is a very serious message.
Cornelia
What you are refering to is MK77,
MK-77 is a napalm canister munition. The MK77 familiy is an evolution of the incendiary bombs M-47 and M-74, used during the conflict in Korea and the war in Vietnam,
Looking at the images of the corpses on the film, i must say are so shocking
and upsetting, there skin is burned, but there clothes are not, this definetly raises a lot of serious questions, are the U S and Britain Covering up the use of Napalm in Iraq?
Some twit on this post said that this film is just a propaganda stunt,
Deny Ignorance and see for yourself,
thanks for the info, plz keep us informed about the reaction of this Broadcast, thanks... ian
Originally posted by BomSquad
Do you know where I can find a reference to that ban? Is there a particular treaty or UN resolution that you know of?
International law does not prohibit the use of napalm or other incendiaries against military targets[2], but use against civilian populations was banned by a United Nations convention in 1980 [3]. The United States did not sign the agreement, but claimed to have destroyed its napalm arsenal by 2001.
The United States had reportedly been using incendiaries in the 2003 invasion of Iraq [4]. In August 2003, the Pentagon confirmed the use of Mark 77 firebombs.
Originally posted by justyc
can you see any reason why they would make that up?
Originally posted by Umbrax
I got this from wikipedia
International law does not prohibit the use of napalm or other incendiaries against military targets[2], but use against civilian populations was banned by a United Nations convention in 1980 [3]. The United States did not sign the agreement, but claimed to have destroyed its napalm arsenal by 2001.
The United States had reportedly been using incendiaries in the 2003 invasion of Iraq [4]. In August 2003, the Pentagon confirmed the use of Mark 77 firebombs.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by justyc
can you see any reason why they would make that up?
1. $$$
2. Fame
3. Sympathy (ooooh, look at me, I was a bad guy and
now I'm a 'good guy'. Embrace me)
4. Pushing his own political ideologies - using false info
isn't anything new to politicians.
5. He wants to run for something and thinks he can
get the anti-American vote.
6. etc. etc. etc.
it didn't happen.
[edit on 11/7/2005 by FlyersFan]
Originally posted by Dronetek
Sir, how do you know those are burns and not normal decay? How do you know who even killed those people? You don’t, but you are not interested in facts here. You are only concerned with the seriousness of the charge and how it forms your myopic view of America.