It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
clearly never worked alongside any of them. I have. And you're talking bollocks.
originally posted by: browha
Personally, I still love how the American's TOP units still rely on the good old british for help...
No one will ever surpass the SAS and SBS as the world's elite.
From what I have read (Not verified), but the Delta Force selection process is the equivilant of the british army training scheme....
As well as that, the recent 'stress-card' scheme in the US military is a JOKE. Dont know if hyou know about it, but they get to hold up a card when they feel they are being drilled too intensely, or the training is too physical for them... Without punishment.
The American Special Forces is, frankly, a joke. During Aghanistan, the british Royal Marines were called in to replace climatized US forces atop of the highest mountains in Afganistan, on the simple basis that the US were not up to the job (The british forces hadnt acclimatized, etc).
I cant wait till the friendly fire statistics are published, or like the story of the American A10 during the first gulf war, 'It was a british tank with a british flag but we thought it was an Iraqi tank trying to decieve us'.
FYI, something like 30 tanks were lost in the First Gulf War, 20-25 of them 'friendly' fire..
Brilliant, fighting with these Yanks, isnt it?
They didnt help us in the Falklands, I dont see why we help them here.
originally posted by: 5leepingWarrior
a reply to: cassini
ve seen some articles that reference to it without coming right out and saying what/who it is
The most secret unit is the one you've never heard of, and never will. Otherwise, its not much of a secret, now is it?
originally posted by: Fyrwulf
First of all, The Command: Deep Inside The Pentagon's Secret Army is a good reference for JSOC in general and the ISA in particular. The Activity is a comic book about a fictional (obviously) direct action cell within the ISA.
Second, some facts about the ISA. They started as a temporary task force in the run up to Operation Eagle Claw to gather intel for Delta/CAG/ACE/whatever on key principles and weaknesses in the American embassy in Tehran for the assault. This included both ELINT and HUMINT, because the military didn't trust the CIA's very weak assets on the ground.
One of the more amusing anecdotes that's made the public record is that during the the hunt for Pablo Escobar the ISA got tired of the CIA and FBI's pissing matches with them and challenged them to a duel of sorts; each ELINT unit had to triangulate the position of a known compromised communication device to the nearest distance and the winner got to stay, everybody else had to go. The CIA and FBI lost. Badly.
Somewhere along the line the ISA picked up a direct action directorate to go with the ELINT and HUMINT directorates. It's a very small element and supposedly trained by Delta. From there the concept of intelligence fusion cells and sensitive site exploitation was born, which has since been promulgated down to the big army, thanks to some names you probably know but wouldn't suspect of being former officers in the unit.
Third, if you've heard a name associated with the unit, it's long since been out of use. The unit changes Special Access Program names yearly (Grey Fox was an SAP name) and unit names every two years. Much like with any JSOC unit, there isn't a permanent name. Power Geyser, to use an example, has been mentioned once by a newspaper and it was revealed that they're focused on counter-NBC operations, but that doesn't really tell you a whole lot. Remember the axiom of the tip of the iceberg.
Fourth, for the guys wanking over the SAS, I recommend you read Task Force Black, which was written by a Brit author and reveals just how competent the unit is(n't). From the lack of good equipment that caused a couple unnecessary accidents to the inability to keep up with American operational tempo, the SAS' reputation is frankly overstated. The reason they operated with JSOC in Iraq is their size. That and SEAL Team 6 was busy in Afghanistan. JTF2, Grom, Danish Jaegers, and Australian SASR (among others) are held in much higher regard by American commanders.
originally posted by: sg1642
Have you ever worked with any of UKSF? If not, don't call them incompetent because you read a book. There are much worse things can be said for the American military from top to bottom not just your special forces. These things are normally spoken by men who don't know what they are talking about and have little to no experience working with us forces. I believe the term is 'armchair warrior'
If you could give me some examples of incompetence that would be appreciated. And I don't mean things you have read in a book. Then I'll give you a few in return and we'll see who has the longest list at the end of it.
originally posted by: cassini
heres an excerpt from one of the articles I saw them mentioned in
"The army created a highly compartmentalized organization that could collect clandestine intelligence independent of the rest of the US intelligence community, and follow through with covert military action. Today, it operates under the code name Grey Fox."
It sounds intriguing and I`d love to find out more but given its high secretiveness I`m not if its gonna be possible.
originally posted by: Fyrwulf
originally posted by: sg1642
Have you ever worked with any of UKSF? If not, don't call them incompetent because you read a book. There are much worse things can be said for the American military from top to bottom not just your special forces. These things are normally spoken by men who don't know what they are talking about and have little to no experience working with us forces. I believe the term is 'armchair warrior'
If you could give me some examples of incompetence that would be appreciated. And I don't mean things you have read in a book. Then I'll give you a few in return and we'll see who has the longest list at the end of it.
One, if I did have experience working with them or knowledge of their activities outside of what is available in the public domain, such things would be classified and not for discussion on a public forum. Two, even were I inclined to discuss such things, which I'm not, they'd be unsourced and unverifiable statements. Three, I didn't say they were incompetent, I said they're not the be all and end all of special operations units that some in this thread have claimed them to be.