It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Actually there is a critical point which makes that untrue, and infact makes that assertion apply only to the Palestinian claim. Israel is the ONLY NATION which has existed there independently.
Originally posted by BANGINCOLOR
Yes, I'm Googling the subject to death. I feel understanding the roots of terrorism in the Middle Eastern region would come from knowledge so, can anyone explain to me how, 100 years ago, there was no Israel and now there is? I am watching the West Wing right now, the episode where president Bartlett has the Israeli and Palestinian leaders over to Camp David to try and hammer out a peace agreement. Thru this episode I am getting bits and pieces of information. Palestinians made a mistake back in '38 when they were offered their own state? Or something to that effect? How did the jews just come in and take over a piece of land that belonged to someone else? Or so it would seem. Please clarify, in hopes of better understanding today's terrorism climate.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
Before WWI the Land was part of the Ottoman Empire, and before that a succession of Islamic nations controled it for 1300 years other than the relatively brief Crusader occupation.
It has always been part of a nation other than when Westerners invaded.
www.friesian.com...
[edit on 26-10-2005 by ArchAngel]
Originally posted by ptownrob
To me, although I intellectually understand the political need for a Jewish state, wonder how the U.S. would have reacted if the U.N. had decided to take over Brooklyn, NY, and hand it over to the Jews. There would be a war that makes the current strife look like a game of poker.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
Actually there is a critical point which makes that untrue, and infact makes that assertion apply only to the Palestinian claim. Israel is the ONLY NATION which has existed there independently.
This simply is not true.
The land did not just rise up out of the sea with Jews already living on it.
Before WWI the Land was part of the Ottoman Empire, and before that a succession of Islamic nations controled it for 1300 years other than the relatively brief Crusader occupation.
Originally posted by BANGINCOLOR
Why can't they share the land, live in peace like the rest of the world?
I think Israel needs a makeover. Why don't they just make it a blend of both cultures?
Originally posted by C0le
Brits controlled land there, gave it to the jews, to form a country of there own, There were other places then the current location, That were considered to be the new jewish state in that region though.
They are incabable of compromise, which is why until they are capabale of such things, there will never be peace in that region..
Originally posted by TrueLies
It wasn't right for the British to give Jewish people stolen land was it?
If I was a palestinian I wouldn't want to compromise either! Based off principle, it's wrong, and I would not yield.
They are in the middle of a region that was already at war before they even moved in, and once they moved in they made that region even worse... They tell reporter's that you can't let that thing bother you or get to, it's insane!
Rome stole it from the Jews, Rome split and the stolen land was in the hands of the Byzantines. The Caliphate stole it from them. The Ottomans stole it from them. The Brits stole it from them, then gave it back to the original owners.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
You missed the part where the Israelites stole the land from the Cainanites, and you ignored the fact that Israel violated the covenant so the Roman occupation was Gods curse upon them as promised.
See Deuteronomy 28 for details.....
Does this mean that you fully accept the Bible as a historical reference, and are willing to accept all the "Books" as empirical evidence? Does this extend to any "future considerations" that may be alluded to?
Originally posted by ArchAngel
What I do or do not accept is of little import.
That the Zionist Jews, and Christians use the Torah to promote their claim to the land while ignoring the covenant is important.
By the very source they use to claim ownership of the land they are damned to exile as long as they fail to honor Gods commandments.
Do you hold the Palestinians to the same theological standard?
Originally posted by ArchAngel
I am not a Koranic expert so I cannot say that they are violating any covenant with God, but I am a biblical expert of sorts that does not ignore the Covenant as the Zionist extremists do.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
That the Zionist Jews, and Christians use the Torah to promote their claim to the land while ignoring the covenant is important.