It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I agree.
I also think if survivors scavenge through the rubble before everything gets bulldozed it is not looting.
Originally posted by soficrow
Grady: This thread is full of information regarding Katrina's impacts, particularly on the poor in New Orleans. It is not about me or my politics. .
Reality #2: The basic major media premise all week has been that the 20% who were left behind were all black, and poor and the rich got out of town. This is simply put, nonsense – and racist. New Orleans is a poor city (more than twice the national poverty rate). Most of those who got out of town were not rich, and were not driving SUVs, as Tim Russert sneered on the air Sunday (in a disgracefully-conducted interview with Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff).
A little elementary math will address this canard. According to the 2000 census, New Orleans' population of 484,000 included approximately 136,000 whites, and 326,000 blacks. The white figure includes 7,000 Hispanics who classify themselves as white on the census forms. If 80% of New Orleans residents got out early – and this is the Mayor's number – then only about 97,000 residents remained. Assume all of them were black, (which of course they were not). That would mean that 229,000 blacks got out early, and 136,000 whites along with them. In other words, the successful mass evacuation substantially benefited black residents of the city.
At least 70% of black residents of New Orleans got out of the city before the storm (assuming 100% of those left behind were black), and undoubtedly more than that (since all those left behind were not black). It is almost certainly the case that the great majority of those who were left behind were black. There are obvious reasons for this, including the fact that New Orleans is overwhelmingly a black city to begin with.
www.freerepublic.com...
Originally posted by FredT
YOU include your politics in every thread. So its a relevant discussion.
Lets take a poke at your population controll theory shall we?
Originally posted by 27jd
I can't believe some here seem to be intentionally focusing on the few street hood punks that caused problems, ...the federal government FAILED MISERABLY to protect AMERICAN CITIZENS, period.
It is now more obvious than ever that the war on terror, and in Iraq, was never intended to protect American citizens, because when we are actually in trouble, our military is nowhere to be found, instead they're protecting corporate financial interests across the ocean. It took five days of intense public outcry, and a staggering amount of needless suffering and death, to get a response. F*** that.
Originally posted by soficrow
I don't think I do. And I don't think it's appropropriate for Moderators to participate in personal bashing OR to help derail threads.
Government created this crisis of confidence - now they're shooting Americans who are strong enough, and independent enough, to make their own way. Instead of applauding survivors for their Yankee gumption, the government is prosecuting. For shame.
This is forced interment - an ultimatum, not a choice.
I suspect the focus on "looting, raping, and murdering" is radically exagerated to justify pop-control measures. ...But no, I am not defending the criminals, just the people trying to hang on to their homes, and rebuild their lives.
But here's some straight talk I had NO idea was out there:
"Bush is a firm believer that looting should limited to the class of carpetbaggers and war criminals to which he belongs. He has no problem with the “no-bid” contracts and war-profiteering that has plagued Iraqi debacle from Day One. The $9 billion of purloined Iraqi oil revenue never even drew a raised eyebrow from our benighted leader, but the notion that that corruption might be extended democratically to everyone regardless of class -- now that’s the REAL crime as Bush sees it."
Yet across the media spectrum, the faint hint of disapproval drips from the affluent observers, the clear implication that the victims were just too lazy and shiftless to get out of harm's way. There is simply no understanding -- not even an attempt at understanding -- the destitution, the isolation, the immobility of the poor and the sick and the broken among us. "
you are going to make some point, eventually?
Originally posted by soficrow
I don't think I do. And I don't think it's appropropriate for Moderators to participate in personal bashing OR to help derail threads.
Originally posted by soficrow
I trust you are going to make some point, eventually?
Originally posted by soficrow
The key words, hence key players, are Halliburtin - and Carlyle Group.
Whenever there's a concerted effort at thread derailment, scroll back to identify the trigger(s). Ask yourself, "What are they trying to bury?"
Originally posted by soficrow
In this case, it was the suggestion of a possible connection between the Katrina fiasco, Halliburton, and the Carlyle Group (on another thread).
Originally posted by soficrow
Also - this.
"...As convoys of commandeered school buses and Greyhound coaches transported tens of thousands of refugees out of the submerged city yesterday, in a belated and much-criticised relief operation, each vehicle brought with it new tales of horror. ..."
and much, much more
Behind the scenes, a power struggle emerged, as federal officials tried to wrest authority from Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco (D). Shortly before midnight Friday, the Bush administration sent her a proposed legal memorandum asking her to request a federal takeover of the evacuation of New Orleans, a source within the state's emergency operations center said Saturday.
.................
Louisiana did not reach out to a multi-state mutual aid compact for assistance until Wednesday, three state and federal officials said. As of Saturday, Blanco still had not declared a state of emergency, the senior Bush official said.
Originally posted by ThichHeaded
Everytime the government screws something up they are there.
OK City, NYC and DC, and probably more that I dont know about and now Katrina aftermath.. Come on its not hard to get a clue, these companies are brought in to hide things from us... Important things..
But i just want this question answered.
Since say....... 1950 or so, name one other natral/man made distaster in the US that took 6 days to respond to?