It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LazarusTheLong
Originally posted by Drexon
Uh. Hasn't it been LONG SINCE ESTABLISHED beyond all doubt that these were flares? I saw a long documentary on the Discovery channel about this and they had overwhelming evidence that they were infact flares. They fell slowly, they can be seen for miles and miles, the space between them and fall speed was perfectly coherent to a plane dropping them AND there was a god damn military base literally below the sigtings.
yes, and no...
the second sighting, later the same day (evening)... was most diffinatley flares...
this was an effort by the military to confuse the public and cover up one of the most documented, and witnessed ufo sightings ever...
the first sighting has been shown to be significantly different, from witnesses who saw both the events at both times...
They had to do something...
also, have you wondered why the military never admitted to dropping flares later on?
if it was just flares, then why wouldn't they...
IMO they needed to keep the two sightings and times confused...
so that people would assume what is true for one, is true for the other...
(they Are flares after all),
Originally posted by thecry
I don't think it was flares or a UFO ,I think it was some kind of aircraft built by the goverment.The reason I think this is because you would think if it was a UFO the airforce woud send jets to intercept it... which they didn't.
Originally posted by thecry
I don't think it was flares or a UFO ,I think it was some kind of aircraft built by the goverment.The reason I think this is because you would think if it was a UFO the airforce woud send jets to intercept it... which they didn't.
Originally posted by thecry
I don't think it was flares or a UFO ,I think it was some kind of aircraft built by the goverment.The reason I think this is because you would think if it was a UFO the airforce woud send jets to intercept it... which they didn't.
"On the night of 13 Mar 97, our aircraft were involved in normal training missions and had no involvment what so ever with the lights observed over Phoenix"
Originally posted by Postal76
If the Phoenix Lights weren't flares (which they probably were), then they were something equally mundane. If you look at a video of the event, the lights come on one by one, and die out one by one in order, and they don't appear to move at all. How does this make people think, "GIANT EXTRATERRESTRIAL CRAFT!"??? It has been convincingly shown that there is a ridge line behind which the flares fell, making it look like they die out in turn. This explanation is completely logical and by far the simplest!
I think some of the people that claim to have seen a solid object were simply falling for a sort of illusion: they essentially "connected" the dots in the sky, imagining it to be a larger object.
As for the "military cover up," it just doesn't make any sense. Assuming that there was an earlier and separate UFO sighting, I don't see why the military would go to such lengths to create a diversion later on. Why wouldn't they follow their normal routine and completely ignore it?