It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by trinitrotoluene
I think it would be great to also offer a World Religion class in high schools. An open environment where people would learn about what different religions believe, but not discuss their validities.
Originally posted by warpboost
I really don't understand what people's problem with teaching ID along side evolution in public schools is if it's done in a non denominational manner???
Originally posted by warpboost
Does evolution answer the question of what created everything in the first place which allows evolution to take place?
Originally posted by warpboost
There's nothing of substance How about you??
Originally posted by warpboost
I'm no ID expert or anything and I don't know that they need an entire class devoted it to it, but they should at least make people aware of the idea. I would cover the whole idea of ID and maybe touch on how it's taught in various religions with no emphasis at all on any single one. I would have group discussions or debates on it and compare ID vs evolution.
Originally posted by warpboost
I would talk about the statistical probability of life just forming here on earth. IIRC someone once said that the chances of intelligent life just happening bu chance is about the same odds as a tornado touching down in a scrap yard and forming a 747.
Originally posted by warpboost
I would point out some of the flaws or weak spots in evolution and how ID "could" possibly explain them.
Originally posted by warpboost
www.discovery.org has more info about ID and how it could be taught next to evolution in schools than you could ever want so if you're really interested check it out.
Originally posted by cybertroy
And honestly, with this incredible universe around us, what is so unbelievable about there being a creator anyway? I ask why not a creator? Why not?
Troy
Originally posted by cybertroy
Hey spamandham,
The role of the creator - let's look at the definition 1 of the word "create" from dictionary.com: "To cause to exist; bring into being."
As far as I understand it, the role of the creator is much like the definition above says.
Troy
[edit on 11-9-2005 by cybertroy]
Originally posted by cybertroy
It's ok Riley. No problem. If you don't see it then you don't. But again I want to comment on this painting you mention. I'm willing to bet you still had the idea and made the decision to start the painting, before you even started, bottom line.
Your reasoning is flawed as for an artist to have an idea to create.. they first need paint to work with [matter]- the painting cannot exist without a canvas existing beforehand [space]. This is not a sentient being. Of course the painting could not exist without the artist.. but without time and space neither could the artist. For a sentient being to exist it needs to be somewhere.. and for it to have a concept of space and time [obviously your god does has as it counted 7 days/ages.. when did it know to start counting?] it would need to exist within it as time cannot exist without space.
Again [in brief].. How does a sentient being exist outside of space and time?
Your 'challenge' isn't even relevent. It does not prove a creator.. it only proves that PEOPLE can sometimes create things subconciously. How does that disprove metaphysical reactions [the big bang]?
without a consciousness of some sort, call it god, the creator, whatever you like, to drive the creation of things, then I don't see how matter is going to spontaneously form and stand up and and say "hey, how ya doin'?" The odds against it are staggering.
But evolution would not have started anyway without an initial "push."
Originally posted by spamandham
Be carefull what you ask for. Evil atheist conspirators such as myself will make sure you do not have the free reign to indoctrinate that is your real agenda.
Originally posted by Charlie Murphy
Spamandham I have to ask you, how can you be Athesit vs. being an Agonstic? Isn't that jumping to the same conclusions as a religous person?
Originally posted by Charlie Murphy
I guess it depends on the definition of God. What if God is just a set of laws that govern the Universe?
Originally posted by cybertroy
Riley, why can it "not" be logical to have a creator?
I don't understand why anyone can say there isn't a creator and be certain about it, yet say dirt formed spontaneously and somehow became conscious over billions of years? Both explanations are quite incredible, so why not a creator?
Science with all it's volumes of books still doesn't explain ghosts to any satisfactory degree. And science still doesn't explain, in a satisfactory way, why people have past life recollection.
Originally posted by cybertroy
Riley, why can it "not" be logical to have a creator? The fact that we are here is amazing in itself, so why not a "god" or "creator?" Why is this a difficult thing to see as a possibility?
Originally posted by cybertroy
I don't understand why anyone can say there isn't a creator and be certain about it,
Originally posted by cybertroy
yet say dirt formed spontaneously and somehow became conscious over billions of years? Both explanations are quite incredible, so why not a creator?
Originally posted by cybertroy
Science with all it's volumes of books still doesn't explain ghosts to any satisfactory degree. And science still doesn't explain, in a satisfactory way, why people have past life recollection.