It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Misfit
To you that proclaim so adamantly that there is no life on Mars .............
Why do you confine yourselves to fit alien requirements to that of human requirements? Becasue humans need water and air, that means all possible life anywhere in the solar system / universe also must have water and air to live?
Hell the only thing that thought process does is set humans on such a pedestle that one would not know an alien even if one was sticking its anteanna up your nose.
Humans ...... about an arrogant friggen race.
Misfit
Originally posted by SiberianTiger
Yes there are man made things on Mars, The Illuminati use tech invented by Tesla to make these images in order to make people think there life on other planets. www.hourofthetime.com...
The threat is presented through the use of secret technology originally developed by the Germans in their secret weapons programs during WW-II, by geniuses like Nikola Tesla, and many others.
Originally posted by apc
Is silicon life even chemically possible? Under the conditions that we are familiar with... not really. But who knows what scenarios exist in other star systems.
Originally posted by apc
Thing is... carbon based life does require a few key parameters and consistantly develop a few particular characteristics... these are what we look for when we search for life elsewhere. Of the three types of life here on Earth, it is safe to say these same types are what we will encounter if we look for other carbon based lifeforms.
Glass stuctures on the moon don't exist. The technology back in the sixtees wasn't avalabe to "airbrush" them out of a film in a matter of minutes. The corrosive sands of the moon and space debris would have spelled the end to them a long time ago.
Originally posted by GoldEagle
Glass stuctures on the moon don't exist. The technology back in the sixtees wasn't avalabe to "airbrush" them out of a film in a matter of minutes. The corrosive sands of the moon and space debris would have spelled the end to them a long time ago.
Originally posted by Misfit
But see, to constrain the search to that of elements of carbon based life, is constraining yourself (whoever) to looking for human traits in an alien world.
Originally posted by Whompa1
The only way we will ever know 100% is to get someone up there either that or stop picking these desolate landing zones for these probes and drop one smack dab in the middle of these "ruins" Thats my by big WTF NASA?
Originally posted by MickeyDee
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Maybe you've never seen either of these links here:
The "Face on Mars"
NASA Captures New Images of the Face on Mars
Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions: City Slicker
Come on.....are you telling me you believe everything NASA and the US government as a whole says?????
After the uproar 'The Face' caused would you be suprised if NASA doctored the new images???
Mic
[edit on 13/7/2005 by MickeyDee]
space.com - Phil Plait
"This kind of pseudoscience is like a virus. At low levels, it's no big deal, but when it reaches a certain threshold it becomes sickening."
Originally posted by GoldEagle
Why waste our probes on an assumption that there are ruins there. If we know that nothing is there, then there is no point investigating. The areas that the probes are sent to land are "goldmines" of rich geological features that will help us better understand the the formation of the planets and the essentials for life itself. I think those questions are far more important to us at the moment then a bunch of rock piles that are based on the assumption of a "pseudoscientist" to be artifical.
Also it would be diffucult to land a probe on Mars "smack dab" in a location. We land our probes within and estimated eliptical area that can span miles. It is also alot safer for probes to land in desolite locations, without risk of parachuting into a cliff face or terrain feature.
Anyways, the MGS proved that Cydonia is a bunch of rocks, cliffs, hills, mesas, why fight it further?
[edit on 7/16/2005 by GoldEagle]
Rocks get various forms with erosion.........but a square based pyramids? a bunch of the, actually, in the same place?
Originally posted by GoldEagle
with slightly eroded protions