It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by infinite
So who done it then?
and why was it done? ID cards, police state, authotarian laws? all the conspiracy reasons have been debunked already
Originally posted by AdamJ
lol come on, all the conspiracies have been debunked? i dont think so.
Al-Qaeda has been debunked too, doesnt seeem to bother people.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I do apologize. And in fact, it wasn't Blair, but the Ministry of Defense. So again, my apologies. I was using them synonomously and going on the assumption (Ack!) that this was accepted fact. I'm not sure whose word takes priority, but the announcement was made.
MoD Plans Iraq Troop Withdrawal - July 4, 2005
Defence chiefs are planning to reduce the size of the British military force in Iraq from 9,000 to 3,500 troops within 12 months as part of a phased withdrawal from Iraq, The Telegraph can reveal.
In the first stage of Britain's "exit strategy", troops will be withdrawn from three of the Army's five military bases in southern Iraq by April 2006.
--snip--
Senior American and British military figures believe that withdrawals can begin by April next year because coalition forces will have trained enough members of the Iraqi defence and police forces to take control of security throughout Iraq.
Originally posted by infinite
Originally posted by AdamJ
lol come on, all the conspiracies have been debunked? i dont think so.
Al-Qaeda has been debunked too, doesnt seeem to bother people.
WOW!!! Thats a big claim....
Al Qaeda has not be debunked on ATS.
Whoever bombed London was a home grown terrorist, the UK attack is domestic. Just cause 9/11 was a conspiracy,in some eyes, doesnt mean this is.
Originally posted by tbare
Not all media reporters have their lips attached to the governments bungholio you know.
The one's that aren't would come out and say whatever truth they have about the subject regardless if the government wanted it hush hush...
[edit on 9-7-2005 by tbare]
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Blair had announced he would be pulling British troops from Iraq. Rove was in the news. Not only that, but Bush’s approval rating is at an all-time low and his support for the war in Iraq is drastically waning in the US.
Saturday July 09, 2005--Fifty-one percent (51%) of American adults approve of the way George W. Bush is performing his role as President. This is the fourth straight day his Approval Rating has topped 50%.
The President's Approval Rating is 54% among men and 48% among women.
Bush ratings above 50 percent
Originally posted by Seekerof
I am still failing to see the "desperation" in this matter prior to the events of 7-7-2005, though, but hey, that is just my take.
"Al-Qaida is now an ideology. It's moved beyond being a structural organization," he said. "All one has to do to form an al-Qaida cell is to get together with a group of like-minded individuals and say, 'We are going to start an al-Qaida cell.' ... If one is prepared to carry out an attack in the name of al-Qaida, one becomes an al-Qaida operative."
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
London Bombs Likely Simple and Homemade
But I do believe (from the many articles that I've read) that these attacks were foretold and that Binyamin Netanyahu was directly warned to stay put.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Approval ratings are less important to Bush than ever because he cannot run for re-election.
Regardless, youur statement that his ratings are at an all-time low are incorrect:
Originally posted by infinite
The bombs were not homemade, met police said this afternoon in a news conference
and Israel foriegn minister has reported that there was no warnings
Originally posted by infinite
Please dont get confused that this is related to New York and Madrid, the London attack points to domestic terrorism. The chances are its a cell claiming to be linked to Al Qaeda, not the top dogs from Al Qaeda. Bin Laden probably didnt have any involvement in this at all, heck, he probably has just find out it happened.
I hope you're right. However there is a current proposal in the House to repeal the 22nd Amendment, which, if passed, would mean he could be 're-elected' again.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I hope you're right. However there is a current proposal in the House to repeal the 22nd Amendment, which, if passed, would mean he could be 're-elected' again.
I was speaking of his approval rating in the days prior to the London bombing, not after. Depending on where you look, it was anywhere from 42 to 48%. Have you not read that his approval rating was at an all-time low?
by Benevolent Heretic
Not only that, but Bush’s approval rating is at an all-time low
Originally posted by jsobecky
The proposal needs the ratification of three quarters of the states within seven years, so that pretty much takes him out of the game.
Boy, I hate to nitpick, but...
Originally posted by andy1033
just imagine how many intelligence services there are in england perving into endless amounts of peoples lives. so you somehow think that the intelligence services would not be perving into muslims peoples lives, in this this day and age.
what are the intelligence services there for?
how come there are always people claiming that these intelligence services do nothing and know nothing.
[edit on 8-7-2005 by andy1033]
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Its so funny it doest matter where the attack occurs, who claims responsibly or what kind of attack it was people will always blame the US govern for it. Heck a freaking asteroid can hit mars and I bet we would have people here on ATS blaming the US government for it. US bashing for everything and anything wrong in the world even when you have - evidence seems like a popular sport now day’s. Its truly said it has come to this