It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LoneGunMan
Just one small example: Highjackers take off from different airports and fly all over the eastern seaboard, with minimal training and navigate back and hit three buildings with total precision.
[Snip: Aircraft Characteristics]
ATS Popup
You have voted LoneGunMan for the Way Above Top Secret award.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
It's called GPS. I hear that if you know the coordinates of anywhere on earth, and punch them in, and push this little bar down in the cockpit, that turns on this thing called "autopilot" the airplane will fly you there. That's what I hear anyway. And I also heard that the WTC buildings were pretty obvious sticking up in the skyline there.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
It's called GPS. I hear that if you know the coordinates of anywhere on earth
[Snip]
Originally posted by TheShroudOfMemphis
I heard Dick Cheney turned on that GPS.
It's called GPS. I hear that if you know the coordinates of anywhere on earth, and punch them in, and push this little bar down in the cockpit, that turns on this thing called "autopilot" the airplane will fly you there.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
.... "I hear that if you know"......
.... "that turns on this thing called "autopilot"......
.... "That's what I hear anyway" .....
Originally posted by Zaphod58
I have a perfectly good understanding of how autopilot, navigating, and landing works.
I spent 25 years working around planes, and pilots, and did some flying myself for several years.
And I also heard that the WTC buildings were pretty obvious sticking up in the skyline there.
Oh, and by the way, they were 767-200s, not 757-200s. The Pentagon was a 757.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
It's called GPS. I hear that if you know the coordinates of anywhere on earth, and punch them in, and push this little bar down in the cockpit, that turns on this thing called "autopilot" the airplane will fly you there. That's what I hear anyway. And I also heard that the WTC buildings were pretty obvious sticking up in the skyline there.
Originally posted by Conspicuouz
Tinkle,
the question is, do you believe they were the men in the window-less aircraft that crashed into the tower and do you agree with the official story?
At 7:59 AM, Flight 11 took off from Boston's Logan Airport. At 8:13, the last communication between ground control and the pilots took place. At 8:15 Boston Air Traffic Control began unsuccessful attempts to contact the pilots after the plane failed to respond to an order to climb. At 8:20, Flight 11 stopped transmitting its transponder signal, and veered northward and departed dramatically from the westward heading of its planned route. The controlled concluded that the plane had probably been hijacked, Neither of the pilots pressed the distress call button. At 8:28 controllers reportedly watched the plane make a 100-degree turn toward the south. Presumably, Flight 11 continued south along the Hudson River until it reached the World Trade Center, though documentation of this is sparse given the lack of public information. According to NORAD's September 18 timeline, the FAA did not notify NORAD of the signs that Flight 11 was hijacked until 8:40, 25 minutes after the first signs of trouble.
At 8:21, phone calls from two flight attendants allegedly began. Betty Ong called Vanessa Minter at American Airlines reservations. 8 Flight attendant Madeline Sweeney called American Airlines ground manager Michael Woodward at Logan and spoke calmly to him for 25 minutes until the plane crashed. Supposedly the call was not recorded and Woodward took notes. Her first comment is "Listen, and listen to me very carefully. I'm on Flight 11. The airplane has been hijacked." At 8:45, just before the crash, she said "I see the water. I see the buildings. I see buildings," then after a pregnant pause, a quiet "Oh, my God!"
At 8:14 AM, Flight 175 took off from Boston's Logan Airport, 16 minutes after its scheduled departure time. At 8:42, Flight 175 veered off its planned course, and began flying south. According to NORAD's June 18 timeline and prior press reports, at 8:43 the FAA notified NORAD that the flight had been hijacked. At 8:46, Flight 175 stopped transmitting its transponder signal. 6 The subsequent course of Flight 175 cannot be verified due to the lack of public information, but the plane apparently flew in a southwesterly direction as it crossed the Hudson River, continued into New Jersey until it was southwest of New York City, and then made a sharp turn to the northeast in order to approach the World Trade Center from the southwest.
Phone Calls
There were reportedly two calls from passengers, and one from an unnamed flight attendant on Flight 175. Around 8:43 the father of passenger Peter Burton Hanson received a call from a man claiming to be his son and saying "Oh, my God! They just stabbed the airline hostess. I think the airline is being hijacked." At 8:58 passenger Brian Sweeney is said to have left a message for his wife "We've been hijacked, and it doesn't look too good" and talked to his mother.
Collision
At 9:03, a 767 collided with the South Tower. Whether that jet was in fact Flight 175 is questioned by some. Human remains recovered from Ground Zero were identified as belonging to Flight 175 victims.
The impact was 43 minutes after Flight 11 first went off course, 21 minutes after Flight 175 went off course, and 17 minutes after the North Tower impact, yet the jet was not intercepted.
At 8:20 AM, Flight 77 took off from Dulles International Airport, 10 minutes after its scheduled departure time. At 8:46, Flight 77 veered severely off course. At 8:50, the last radio communication was made from the pilots and air traffic control. At 8:56, the jet's transponder was shut off. The subsequent course of Flight 77 cannot be verified due to the lack of public information, but it apparently reversed direction around 9:10 and began flying back toward the capital. According to NORAD's September 18th timeline, the FAA didn't notify NORAD that Flight 77 was a possible hijack until 9:24, thirty-four minutes after the loss of radio communications. Press reports couch the notification as of a "suspected" hijacking despite reports that the plane was flying toward Washington, DC with its transponder off twenty-one minutes after both towers had been hit.
Phone Calls
There was only one person on Flight 77 who allegedly called: Passenger Barbara Olsen supposedly placed two calls to her husband Ted Olsen. US Solicitor General Olsen related to NEWSWEEK:
Barbara was calm and collected as she told him how hijackers had used boxcutters and knifes to take control of the plane and had herded the passengers and crew to the back. “Ted, what can I do?” she asked him. “What can I tell the pilot?” Then, inexplicably, she got cut off.
Collision
At about 9:38 AM, a twin-engine jetliner flew into the Pentagon and exploded, according to numerous eyewitnesses on the ground. A Minnesota National Guard C-130 that had just taken off from nearby Andrews Air Force Base followed the jetliner in the seconds before it crashed. The pilot of the C-130, who described the plane as either a 757 or 767, provided the following account.
9:10 am: (approximate time) UA flight 77 begins to fly back towards the capital, around 10 minutes after the transponder has been turned off.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
Geez, every time I come back to this thread to catch up, Howard is still pulling out the same rubbish that's been debunked before in the thread. I guess he's hoping that if he repeats something often enough, it will become the truth. I see he's dropped the two-word "prove it" method of rebuttal, however. Shows that everyone's doing a great job and that just won't cut it any more. I think I'll give the "Prove It" thing a test drive though, and see what the ride's like.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Okay. Let's start at the beginning.
Yes, you always do, even when your nonsense has been debunked time and time again.
The impact of the aircraft physically severed ... a few columns opposite the impact point. For WTC 1, this was past the core area on the opposite side of the building.
"A few columns"? So what?? Prove that it was enough to cause a collapse.
We can't know the exact extent of the damage, but we can make reasonable guesses.
We don't want your "guesses", Howie. Prove it! And computer-game simulations with a pre-fixed conclusion don't mean jack.
Common sense tells us that there were three major damage categories
Common sense? You threw common sense out the window with your theory that a few fires collapsed three steel buildings.
C) The column received minimal physical damage, but the fireproofing was knocked of by the shock of the impact and force of the building and aircraft debris.
Minimal damage, and yet the fireproofing was all knocked off? Prove it!
If you sever or significantly damage a column, then it can no longer carry the building loads it was designed to carry. Since these loads do not go away, the adjacent columns now have to carry the weight formerly carried by the damaged columns.
The core had a 600% redundancy. Prove that 5/6 of the core columns were severed.
Other columns with less physical damage would of had the fireproofing scoured off by the impact forces.
By a significant amount?? 5/6ths of the columns? Prove it!
Columns closest to the impact area would have been exposed to the heart of the fuel and building debris fed fires.
Temperature and heat are not the same thing, Howie, and bsbray11 has debunked you on this one time and time again. Steel reaching temperatures hot enough to melt/bend steel for any significant time period? Prove it!
As these columns heated up, they would have gradually lost their ability to support the loads they were designed to support, and the additional loads transfered to them by the significantly damaged, nearby columns.
5/6ths of the columns?? Prove it! They all failed simultaneously?? Prove it!
In addition to the damage to the columns, there was extensive damage to the floor slabs in the impact areas.
The floor slabs don't hold the building up. You know this, right?
The impact damage, and the fires caused the floor slabs to sag, thus the forces that the floor slabs were exerting against the exterior and core columns changed from vertical compression forces to inward tension forces.
Enough to cause simultaneous collapse?? Prove it!
The change in the forces caused the exterior columns to bow inward significantly.
"Significantly"? Prove it!
The bowing pulled the whole side of the building inward up to 10 inches.
Oooooh! A whole 10 inches?! Oh no! That means my shabby old apartment building is about to go in to global collapse. I better get out of here!!...I'm back, it's still standing. BTW, if the building started to "sag" in one direction, if it collapsed under gravity it would continue in that direction and topple over. You say it would all collapse simultaneously and straight down? Prove it!
This inward bowing further reduced the loads the columns were able to carry.
See above
the gradual accumulation of changes to the loading of the columns caused them to fail one by one until a runaway collapse started. In other words, the remaining, undamaged columns were no longer able to support the building.
Wave your hands and say the magic words, "runaway collapse" and suddenly the core columns disappear, and all the rubbish above ties together to make a pile of pick-up sticks and dust, eh? Sorry, but your magic trick didn't work. Despite 600% redundancy (do you even know what that means?) all those undamaged core columns and all those undamaged exterior columns were no longer able to support the building?? Prove it!
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
Steel is not that strong.
WTF!???? Says you. And steel structures are even stronger.
Molten aluminum pouring off of the impact floors
All I see are sparks, and the intensity on the image has been doctored by NIST's own admission. NIST never mentioned "molten aluminium". This is the only piece of information you have come out with all by your little self that isn't parroting the NIST report, and it's complete tripe!! bsbray11 has debunked you on this before as well. You completely made this up. Molten aluminium? Proooooove it!!
It has been reported in the FEMA report (McAllister 2002) as well as in the media that what appeared to be molten metal was observed pouring from the north face near the northeast corner prior to the collapse of WTC 2. This is the area where the sustained fires on the 81st and 82nd had been burning since the aircraft impact. The likely explanation for the observation of pouring liquid is that the material had originally pooled on the floor slab above, i.e., the 81st floor, and that it was allowed to pour out of the building when the floor slab in the immediate vicinity either pulled away from the spandrel or sank down to the point where the window was exposed. The puff of smoke and/or dust just prior to the first appearance of the molten material suggests that the ultimate event responsible for the release of the material occurred suddenly, in the process creating a pressure pulse that forced smoke and/or dust out of open windows over three floors.
The composition of the flowing material can only be the subject of speculation, but its behavior suggests it could have been molten aluminum. Visual evidence already discussed shows that significant wreckage from the aircraft passed through the building and came to rest in the northeast corner of the tower on the 81st floor, i.e., at the location where the molten material apparently originated. Much of the structure of the Boeing 767 is formed from two aluminum alloys that have been identified as 2024 and 7075 (NIST NCSTAR 1-3). The melting points for these alloys vary as the material melts. The Aluminum Association handbook (The Aluminum Association 2003) lists the melting point ranges for the alloys as roughly 500 °C to 638 °C and 475 °C to 635 °C for alloys 2024 and 7075, respectively. These temperatures are well below those characteristic of fully developed fires (ca. 1000 °C), and any aluminum present is likely to have been at least partially melted by the intense fires that had been in the area for nearly 48 min.
estimate the extent of the damage to these columns...