It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IBM
His parents did the right thing. Some parents send thier kids to fat camp for them to lose weight which is healthy. Being gay is unhealty to life, because there is a higher chance of contracting HIV. It is in Zacks best intersest this program. He will thank his parents when he is older.
Originally posted by IBM
Being gay is unhealty to life, because there is a higher chance of contracting HIV. It is in Zacks best intersest this program. He will thank his parents when he is older.
Originally posted by BadMojo
Gays weren't "made", as you put it. Homosexuality is a choice.
Originally posted by BadMojo
jakko, where is the CONCLUSIVE proof that some people are born gay. To say that any child below the age of 5 is homosexual is preposterous. Just becuase it may be changable in a fly's genes? An ape? A fish? A rat? I think more highly of humans than that. With all of the recent reversals in scientific findings in areas of health, I would be hard pressed to say that we have conclusive proof of your theory.
Originally posted by BadMojo
otts, my honest answer is...lacking of proper parenting.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
Secondly, Through which action of mine have I offended your religious faith?
Your intolerance is offensive, not to mention dangerous.
Your faith and values are not above mockery. They are sacred only to you. We live in a society that has freedom of religion, not mandatory religion. Understand the difference?
On the record, if two gay men fornicated in front of you with the intent to cause you distress, you'd have a case, you'd have every right to be offended to the point of seeking retribution. However, imagining what people are doing and being offended doesn't give you the right to persecute them.
Thing is, they're not doing it to cause you distress, your distress comes entirely from you.
When I see those people kissing, I don't get offended, so the act in and of itself is not patently, universally offensive. That means you're the problem, you're the lens through which everything passes.
It just so happens your lens is clouded by religious views, and so you see through the glass, but darkly. Instead of a live and let live approach to life, you have chosen a more controlling path. You seek to direct the lives of others, and that is unacceptable to me, and to many others in this country, not to mention the world.
Originally posted by IAF101
But as you are not a homosexual you are in no position to say that my "intolerance" towards homosexuality is offensive as you are afflicted with their predicament!
Originally posted by Odium
So just because we have not experienced something means we can't feel sorrow for those people who have to suffer it? So I can't hate the intolerance of racists? Or hate what a rapist does due to the fact I have never gone through it?
Yet again your arguements are flawed.
Originally posted by Ksnazdnzon
What do you have to sacrifice..?
You said you have to make sacrifices but they don't.
What are you talking about?
I think the point of the arguement is, it is not acceptable to have morals that are not based in fact and use them to change other's lives, because it will only cause uneeded harm.