It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SMR
............
Molten steel was found “three, four, and five weeks later, when the rubble was being removed [from WTCs 1 & 2] Molten steel was also found at 7 WTC
Burning diesel can't produce enough heat to melt steel, so it certainly can't evaporate it, but thermite can
.............
Originally posted by subz
HowardRoark, how do you explain the speed at which the two towers fell?
One of the towers collapsed in 8 seconds. Thats the speed of free fall with no air resistance. If the tower's floors pancaked on each other wouldnt you expect the floors to cause atleast some resistance? Thus slowing down the fall considerably longer than that of a free falling object from the same height in the absence of air.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Given that there was strong evidence that the aluminum form the plane and the facade melted.
Since the jet fuel spilled down the elevator shafts, I wouldn't be surprized that the molten aluminum did also.
Originally posted by thematrix
if ("table_of_mendeljev") = true
[
molten aluminium != molten steel
]
(ps: "!=" means "not equal")
[edit on 17-6-2005 by thematrix]
Originally posted by toasted
.............
they address the melted steel !
they address pulling wtc7
they won't...
Originally posted by Muaddib
Can you actually provide a direct link to this FEMA document where they talk about melted pools of steel?
BTW subz, are you now going to tell us that you are an expert and that the WTC shouldn't have fallen as fast, or as slow as it did?.....so what some invisible hand was pushing down, or up the towers as they fell?.... oooh boy....
Originally posted by subz
Listen you cretin. Any one that has done high school physics can tell you how a body falls due to gravity.
You dont need to be a damn expert to know how a building that collapses should fall. It should fall a lot slower than a free falling object in a vacuum!
If the building pancake collapsed then all that concrete and steel would severely impede its fall! It couldnt fall to the ground in 8 seconds if there was any resistance whatsoever. I'd call the compression of concrete, steel, people, furniture and rubble "resistance".
If the floor directly below the collapsing section had to compress/pancake before the next floor underneath compressed (simple physics here Muaddib) then the time take for it to fall would be much longer than a free falling object in a vacuum.
Now if the building didnt have to pancake its floors to fall down (i.e. the supporting beams were blown up in sequence) it is possible for it to collapse faster than a free falling body. Because it didnt collapse from a free fall after all!
The only sound explanation that doesnt flout the LAWS OF PHYSICS is that it was demolished. Physics is incontrovertible and you can try your slimey spin manouvers as much as you like with this fact.
8 seconds for a building to collapse of the height of the WTC is impossible! P E R I O D
Originally posted by thematrix
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Given that there was strong evidence that the aluminum form the plane and the facade melted.
Since the jet fuel spilled down the elevator shafts, I wouldn't be surprized that the molten aluminum did also.
if ("table_of_mendeljev") = true
[
molten aluminium != molten steel
]
So what happened to the melted aluminum then?
(ps: "!=" means "not equal")
[edit on 17-6-2005 by thematrix]
Originally posted by subz
Listen you cretin. Any one that has done high school physics can tell you how a body falls due to gravity.
Originally posted by subz
You dont need to be a damn expert to know how a building that collapses should fall. It should fall a lot slower than a free falling object in a vacuum!
Originally posted by subz
If the building pancake collapsed then all that concrete and steel would severely impede its fall! It couldnt fall to the ground in 8 seconds if there was any resistance whatsoever. I'd call the compression of concrete, steel, people, furniture and rubble "resistance".
Originally posted by subz
8 seconds for a building to collapse of the height of the WTC is impossible! P E R I O D
American Free Press has learned of pools of “molten steel” found at the base of the collapsed twin towers weeks after the collapse. Although the energy source for these incredibly hot areas has yet to be explained, New York seismometers recorded huge bursts of energy, which caused unexplained seismic “spikes” at the beginning of each collapse.
These spikes suggest that massive underground explosions may have literally knocked the towers off their foundations, causing them to collapse.
In the basements of the collapsed towers, where the 47 central support columns connected with the bedrock, hot spots of “literally molten steel” were discovered more than a month after the collapse. Such persistent and intense residual heat, 70 feet below the surface, in an oxygen starved environment, could explain how these crucial structural supports failed.
Originally posted by Jamuhn
................
This source is not nearly used enough. The American Free Press is a great website by the way.