posted on May, 30 2005 @ 12:31 AM
Oh, believe me I am not wasting my time here simple because I am looking for an argument. I have seen all the conspiracy sites on this subject, and I
am sorry to say that they do not hold water with someone that has ever worked on that type of aircraft. One reason is that the nose on that aircraft
has a pretty distinct shape to it (it looks like Mickey Mouse with square eyes, Eastern Airlines even used to paint a smile below the ray dome), which
is quite clear in the slowed down video. Sorry to tell you this, but just because the government does not release the other video does not mean that
it was not a 757, it could mean a million other things.
So in a way is this an argument? Well yes and no. You wish to push that it was something other then a 757, and I simply see a 757, traveling at high
speed on a time delayed camera at a fair distance off in the background. If you can answer my questions with credible facts and not speculation, and
show me credible proof that I cannot, through my experience, deny; then you might get me to change my mind. I do in fact believe that there are
unanswered questions as to what did in fact happen that day. One of them I already posed to you was why was this plane not intercepted? However, I
have yet to see anything so far to make me disbelieve that anything but a 757/767 hit any of the three buildings that I would deem to be credible
evidence. Speculation, assumptions, common knowledge, distorted facts, out of scale diagrams, slanted evidence; all abound, but nothing based on
credible fact.