Martyn Stubbs Secret NASA Transmissions

Originally posted by DarthChrisious
Having said all that, he (and people like him) certainly made NASA nervous enough to do something about it.

What was that?

Jim...All you do is motivate me to share more of my footage with ATS, You Tube etcetera...and..You know that the 2nd Space Phenomena is real & not cosmic rays & you` are very quiet on this strange NASA phenomena. And 3 people have sent me more of this from the 3 last NASA missions..so NASA is failing to censor it...I even frame captured them on a CNN feed !.... & posted it on the secretnasaman You Tube channel along with 200 plus other NASA vids... I have a lot more NASA mission video to review & post yet, that should keep you busy 'splaining the unexplainable ...

RE another posted comment...
I have no problem with David Sereda & we spoke last night on a new "tether" breakthrough we are working on with the worlds best imaging labs..so stay tuned..I will see if I can show everyone some of the work as I just got some of the new still images today & they show more than I thought they would!...

Finally & sadly Graham Birdsall & Jeff Challender both have passed away..& they were wonderful friends who loved working with me on the NASA footage. I miss them.

Originally posted by secretnasaman
I have a lot more NASA mission video to review & post yet, that should keep you busy 'splaining the unexplainable ...

Which you try to make harder by withholding the date/time of the video so context cannot be determined. Tricky!!

Jim, I am,like you, not a perfect human & part of the reason to revisit my Archive is for me to learn more.
A lot of what you claim is "withholding" is not. I think it is better to observe the NASA flight day videos & LISTEN to how much detail NASA & the astronauts DO NOT GIVE.

Much of what you see is in context & of many of the flights circumstances are obvious. NASA has hundreds of pages of "detail" already posted & I had no problem matching much of the various flight videos details by specific payload "events"..Which satellites were with which mission...who the astronauts were on the videos..who's voice was CAPCOM...the control room shots reveal more..etc..I post the pictures & NASA posts the words(your details?) ...but I'm aware now of your line of attack..paperwork!

Yes...Jim , I will improve my posts & info as life is full of lessons..but so very many of the posts I read have no problem with missing details, paperwork, & all that stuff you love to complain is missing! ATS members want to SEE what NASA won't post...& not read what NASA has already fully posted. This is the 21st century.

Martyn, by posting as little context as possible, you allow people's -- and your own -- imagine to run wild. The most hilarious example continues to be your insistence that in one case Mission Control is relaying an order to astronauts to 'stay vector' in the face of a UFO confrontation -- a musunderstanding of the words so basic it's breathtaking. Will you even consider the possibility that you have misinterpreted the spoken words?

Originally posted by JimOberg
The most hilarious example continues to be your insistence that in one case Mission Control is relaying an order to astronauts to 'stay vector'

Totally wrong.."continues to be your insistence that"... is lying like a sidewalk! In 2001, I dropped any Vector talk...after your debate with the U.K. UFO magazine. And same with that 'astronaut replaced' stuff. I dropped it as it deviates from the NASA UFO videos...

Jim its not about me, or what I once said 8 years ago. ..Move on..please, cuz it just is not true I "continue". Every time you throw this stay vector out at me, it's you that "continues" to insist...not me!

Originally posted by starrychloe
I've been trying to get in contact with Martyn Stubbs after seeing him in a Paranormal TV episode. I wanted to tell him the light streaks are most likely cosmic rays hitting the video sensor of the camera. That would also explain why some are red and some are green. More expensive video sensors have prisms which split the image onto separate red, green, and blue chips and the image is merged electronically. This is especially true for low-light cameras. It would explain why they are very fast and very short. My other thought was an artifact on the VHS tape he was using, but the cosmic rays make more sense. He can even verify this by sending a video camera (or several) up in a balloon into the higher atmosphere and recording.

This would also explain the flashes of light the astronauts see too. Read about Anatoli Bugorski who saw flashes of light when his head was struck by a proton beam in a Soviet particle accelerator.
en.wikipedia.org...

Please pass it on to him.

Hi Martyn, I see you're posting here now, did you have any thoughts on this question about the flashes being caused by cosmic rays, posted earlier? I was wondering the same thing. Sorry it's a bit dated but I'm still curious if you ever looked into this.

Originally posted by secretnasaman
Jim its not about me, or what I once said 8 years ago. ..Move on..please, cuz it just is not true I "continue". Every time you throw this stay vector out at me, it's you that "continues" to insist...not me!

Thanks for clearing it up, and glad to hear it. Sorry that I didn't find some why to learn this earlier, but I couldn't manage to until you just told me. Good.

reply to post by Arbitrageur

We- the late Graham Birdsall, his brother in law Russ (UFO DATA)& I got in touch with LEXX CCD in the EU & they sent it in writing that the CCD on the shuttle camera was not being affected by Cosmic Rays. They made it perfectly clear that the CCD camera, first used on mission STS-61, was seeing something.

A top "expert" in OZ then quit that theory. If true, science prizes would/should come my way for this Cosmic Ray display. Now science is back to square one trying to get a picture of one.

So the 2nd space phenomena is what you see...real. Somewhere this letter is posted & others quote it in debates. Sorry I don't have it at my fingertips!

Originally posted by secretnasaman
They made it perfectly clear that the CCD camera, first used on mission STS-61, was seeing something. ...

The technical specs on the shuttle payload bay cameras are here:

science.ksc.nasa.gov...

CLOSED-CIRCUIT TELEVISION SYSTEM

There's no record that a CCD system is involved anywhere -- the optical sensor is a "silicone intensified target tube" technology.

As far as I can tell, the evidence for the presence of a "CCD" feeding the live downlink video is purely imaginary. Other science cameras can be on board, but they were not -- as far as the records show -- involved in recording and transmitting the videos in question.


More:

8. UFOMag insists that “We never raised the issue of CCD cameras, and neither did James for that matter,” but actually, they did. When trying to prove there was no prosaic explanation for SP-2 streaks, they relied on testimony of various expert electronics groups, all of whom were told by UFOMag that the cameras were CCDs. Since the cameras in question weren’t CCDs, all this expert testimony is totally irrelevant. Although astronauts have had hand-carried video camcorders inside the cabin, we're talking about the cameras which took the famous STS-75 scenes, and other 'SP-2 EVA scenes, which were the payload bay cameras, mounted in all four corners and also on two locations on the robot arm. What kind of video equipment do they have? I quote from the NASA-JSC document, 'Shuttle Ops (for) INCO/COMM", JSC-18611 is the code number, section SCP 16, "CCTV", by Robert Castle and Roberto Moolchan, dated 9/15/87: Para 16.2: "All television cameras are identical and interchangeable. Each functions as a basic monochrome television system utilizing a silicon intensified target (SIT) tube." Further, Para 16.2.3 Automatic Light Control -- "The automatic light control (ALC) circuits control the voltage applied to the image intensifier on the vidicon, the gain of the video circuits, and the position of the iris." The model number flown in the late 1980s and through the mid-1990s was the '508', replacing the '506' used in the first decade. They differ only in light control modes, not in optical systems. The nature of the external cameras used in the famous 'UFO videos' is well documented and unambiguous. They were not CCDs. Testimony that cosmic ray ‘streaks’ cannot occur in CCDs is therefore worthless in rebutting the cosmic ray hypothesis to explain them. UFOMag still alleges that “Accepting the fact that vidicon tubes 'ghost-smear' under low light conditions, the phenomena [Space Phenomena Two] became a bonifide reality when recorded by CCD cameras, sighting STS-61 for its first appearance,” when it offers no evidence these cameras were any different from the other non-CCD systems.



[edit on 23-9-2009 by JimOberg]

Originally posted by secretnasaman
A top "expert" in OZ then quit that theory. ...

You're not referring to Guido Nigro, director of the SETI Radio Telescope at Golden Grove Observatory, are you?

No Jim ..I am not..her name was Clair something & I was the one person she never contacted to argue with... But she did duke it out with Sereda & the U.K. folks though. Sorry I don't have more "details"!!!

G'day,
I bought The Secret Nasa Transmissions Dvd in an Op shop yesterday.It is the only video of it's type that I own.What grabbed my eye was the multiple orb phenomena on the cover.
I enjoy taking photo's of sunrise,in the blue mountains - Australia.I was going through some photo files a few years back a spotted an anomaly & as my interest grew I spotted more & more.They are very similar to the 'orbs' in the 'satellite tether' sequence.
These photo's have been doing my head in ever since I noticed them.Can I post them for all to critique?

Regards - Ted Keating

reply to post by roo64


You should make your own thread, if you're going to post photos.

Just don't forget that there is a known camera artifact that creates fuzzy blurry doughnut looking images that are similar to those on Stubbs video. Doesn't mean that they are all artifacts, just be aware that the artifacts do exists and are known.

I'm not trying to shoot down yours without seeing them, I'm just giving you a heads up.

Originally posted by TruthxIsxInxThexMist
reply to post by Graham

 

I've just watched the whole video & interview with Stubbs on google video... some interesting footage that i've never seen before... especially all the U'O's flying around the Satellite... some of it was definately rocks, space debris & stars but what of the rest of it?

What about the shot of all the spheres above Earth? There were a lot of them... they say Ice Particles... anyone an expert on Ice Particles? How they move? What altitude they could stay at without melting?

That was the STS-75 Tether incident. Definately UFO's. Watch video. The change direction!

www.youtube.com...

...

reply to post by starrychloe


Sorry to burst any bubbles, but Martyn Stubbs is dead. He died of cancer shortly after the making of this film. I don't know why no one else mentioned it over the last few years on this thread.

Originally posted by scifreaky
Sorry to burst any bubbles, but Martyn Stubbs is dead. He died of cancer shortly after the making of this film. I don't know why no one else mentioned it over the last few years on this thread.

Seems someone forgot to tell Martyn that....

Hey. I've seen the Footage & the interview. interesting stuff but the 2nd phenomena looks like it's out of focus debris? I'm not an expert, just an observation.
As for the crop circles ect well according to the following link unfortunatly a hell of a lot of them are faked by people, even the more complex ones. Here's a link to an interesting Documentary on them...

Here is a video Top Secret UFO Nasa Tapes in the following blog truthfullookufos.blogspot.com... the video is the 2nd from the bottom.

Regards
Micky