Alexander Tau said: Anyone can learn a bit, how far you can go is a mix of talent and effort just like anything else. From my
experience what has been described is someone with natural abilities that are not yet trained. Nothing in normal life prepares you for the impact, the
'it's me feeling this' that you can get from others. It brings confusion, and really just plain gets in the way of rational thought sometimes.
Very helpful and well said. I do agree that empathy is essentially part of the human being. Yes, like a muscle, we can build empathy up by simply
trying to feel what others feel. Similarly, we can deaden it inside us by building walls between ourself and others.
I would say, however, that some people have this muscle already built way, way up. Also, some people have their empathic muscle totally atrophied.
So my question would be: Is it nature or nurture that causes this condition? Really, the question becomes, "Why are some people born with no
empathic sensors?" Is it conditioning?
I don't think these gifts are handed out equally, because we all have different purposes when we incarnate, or so it seems.
Ahh, I see your point of view a bit better now. I would not use the phrase 'handed out' because in any sort of pre-this life state I believe we
would make our own choices. The area of pre-life is not one I have found of particular interest but I do see why people feel as they do about the
concepts.
I wonder if this is true. I was trying to convey the idea that, just as people will huddle together for warmth as incarnated beings (families,
religions, ideaologies, etc) so they may also huddle together as discarnate beings in the afterlife because it's no less lonely up there than it is
down here. When one surrenders to a group, one gains some powers. Groups will always reward loyalty. The cost paid by that individual soul is a
lack of soul-evolution, which eventually will cause retrogression in that soul, or so this idea goes. I personally do not believe the protection
offered by groups helps that soul, in the larger view.
So you were not suggesting some direct actions by another human, or some other being in this case? That was my impression of what you said
previously.
A group usually moves with one mind. I saw this as a youngster inside the Jehovah Witness cult. People will give their souls to a religion or idea
in exchange for a comfortableness and sense of safety. The group-think seduction in the afterlife is equally powerful, I believe.
I am suggesting that souls who go to the afterlife may collect into a group entity and that souls who then choose to incarnate from this group entity
may be purposefully gifted by that group. That does not mean, however, that the soul will remain loyal to the group when it incarnates. That's the
nature of incarnation; We enter into a place where most souls/angels/spirits are not willing to go. They know that life down here is painful and
disorienting.
Incarnation is only for the courageous or the confused, IMO.
---------------------------
Death isn't something that I have any hangups about. [...] What I do have a hangup with is, is the idea of a prolonged suffering. I do not
believe that there is any way I can prepare myself for this eventuality so I am leaving it up to the whims of the universe.
Prolonged suffering in yourself or others? To rephrase it, would you have more fear for prolonged physical pain in your own body (like dying over a
period of weeks due to a tumor or something), or a lifetime of feeling others' pain in this empathic manner. Which frightens you more, if I may ask?
As for my parents, my mom is empathic. But my parents are Baptists and that is were it ends for her. I have been trying to get her to do some
exercises that might help her. She has become overwhelmed lately with the feelings of others. But it is hard to do so without offending her religious
beliefs. Actually, it is more that I am afraid I will offend her than I actually do offend her.
Interesting. I would imagine that the Baptist portion locks her into a dichotomy involving the idea of hellfire/damnation. How can your mother
integrate with her emapthic feelings when she worships a god who places his firey justice above empathy and mercy? That would confuse me, if I were a
Baptist trying to deal with empathic feelings. It would drive me nuts, frankly.
I asked this question because it has been suggested that ESP traits are somehow also genetic. I don't know if this is true or not, but it could be
part of the puzzle for you.
The idea that at the end of our life, we will be replayed on the VCR of God is sort of humorous and daunting at the same time. If we are pieces
of the entity then when we reabsorb, all of our knowledge will be shared. I don't know why it would need to replayed.
I am not so sure that we just automatically receive total recall of our existence when we proceed to the afterlife. I think it's just as open as
this life is, in a way. Sure, in the afterlife we have way more eyes with which to see, but is the picture of existence any less fuzzy up there? I
would say no. I don't think souls ever get taken off the hook of their responsibility to themselves. I think that the God-force wants each soul to
evolve, and evolution requires outside forces and challenges. The environment of our existence (on Earth or in the afterlife) challenges us and
directs us into crisis-positions so that we can figure out how to solve it and thereby grow.
We are like children in that sense. We are relearning to tie our shoelaces with every incarnation and death. Some souls tie their shoelaces for
eternity, whereas some souls move on to many other challenges.
smallpeeps, I am also wondering what you meant by the phrase in one of your earlier postings on "manipulation by others?" Could you please
clarify that a bit. Thanks.
This statement is based on the premise that the spirit world can affect us when we are incarnated. That's what I mean by manipulation. If I were a
low-level un-evolved spirit who spent his time thinking about lust, destruction and chaos, and if I wanted to derail an empathic saint, I would try to
use their gift against them. I would try to influence their thoughts toward over-empathy, which would cause hopelessness and despair in that
incarnate soul. This would require cooperation on the part of the incarnate target, but that's not hard to do when incarnation causes so much
confusion in that incarnate mind.
As to why Wicca did not suit me. It was not that I found it disturbing merely that it wasn't open to me.
Interesting. It has been said that the Wicca system has its own Group Entity in the afterlife just like Catholics and everyone else. I have met
Wiccans for whom it was the automatic and natural path. So long as it doesn't mutate into a cult or abusive situation, I think any religion or
belief-system
can work for a soul if they use it for advancement and not satiation. Wiccans, Baptists and Catholics alike are all free to
achieve soul-evolution, IMO.
[edit on 13-6-2005 by smallpeeps]