It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Rumors of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) around the area of Echo Flight during the time of the fault were disproven. A Mobile Strike Team, which had checked all November Flight’s LF’s on the morning of 16 March 67, were questioned and stated that no unusual activity or sightings were observed.
Well, where is this video and this printout now? Do you have a link to it?
"I'll readily admit to no "proof", but evidence? The evidence is all over the place. There is plenty."
Do you call fuzzy photographs "evidence"?
"And oddly enough, far more evidence supporting aliens than the God that brings so much meaning to your life."
I don't know if it's "far more"; certainly a similar amount. Belief in a diety, like belief in Spaceship Guys, is really a kind of religion. It can't be proven -- or at least it hasn't been, yet. And as far as "evidence' -- The flying saucer photographs I've seen are pretty much like the "miracle" of the Blessed Virgen's face on a tortilla. It just doesn't resonate with me.
"Interesting then, that UFOlogy gets the ridicule, while another unproven belief with far less evidence is treated seriously. But, we've gone down that road in another very long thread..."
So the God Squad has better PR than the Spaceship Guys....
"OTS, well you really have it in for me don't you?"
"I will take personal testimony over a government document any day."
Well, where is this video and this printout now? Do you have a link to it?
Why don't you try looking for it yourself?
I'm not trying to change your mind, just pointing out things I think are credible.
If you want to go through this case by case, we're going to be here for a long time.
What is it that I said that has you only scrutinizing me?
You can't have it both ways. If you don't trust the governmet documents, how can you trust the people who quote those same government documents?
by OTS
HAL, you make a comment that I take issue with, I'm going to call you on it. Thats's what debate is about. There's nothing personal here; I'm taking issue with your data and your logic, not you as an individual. If you don't like anyone questioning your assertions, you shouldn't make them in the first place.
by OTS
And yet you use those same declassified government documents as evidence -- when the evidence happens to agree with what you want. I find it rather odd that these same people that you quote use those declassified documents too.
You can't have it both ways. If you don't trust the governmet documents, how can you trust the people who quote those same government documents?
by OTS
You haven's seen it either, have you? Are you telling me you're giving credibility to a guy who waves a videotape around and you've never seen what's on the tape?
by PBandJtime
I believe the military radar before above and beyond anything else there. I worked with radars a lot in the Navy and I have a friend who was an FAA maintenance tech for a while. The military radars are like night and day compared to the FAA radars. Remember all the talk about upgrading the FAA radars and infrastructure after 9/11 because they were so antiquated?
by PBandJtime
Seeing FAA radar video that shows a ghost image is not going to impress me. I saw my share of that in the Navy on a much more advanced radar than that FAA one.
In other words you need to be a skeptic too
Can you tell us, what can cause ghost images on radar? Thanks.
OTS, I don’t have a problem with you asking about it, but can we do it with a little more friendly demeanor? I am a 43 year old electronic engineer....
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
And remember, if we find out that there really are extra-terrestrial visitors here, I will be as excited and thrilled as anyone else!
Originally posted by Hal9000
Did you happen to find the video or printouts in question? Would you be able to make an assessment if we find them?
Can you tell us, what can cause ghost images on radar? Thanks.
Originally posted by PeanutButterJellyTime
Duty cycle has to be constantly tuned based on the radar's output at that time, the atmospheric conditions, etc. If the duty cycle is adjusted wrong, it could be possible for the radar to recieve a return that is one or more cycles behind. That is, the radar transmits, listens, transmits again, then receives a signal from the first transmission, but mistakenly thinks it is from the second transmission, so it displays a return where there is none.