Paranoid Liberals Believe U.S. Service Members are More Dangerous than Illegal Aliens.

AMEN

a reply to: Xtrozero

If We didn't have the Military You Wouldn't be Typing any of this.
I also Blame DEI for some of this BS.


a reply to: FullHeathen

originally posted by: chiefsmom
a reply to: namehere

Interesting.

So, if I had to be in a room, with say 10 veterans, or 10 Isis members, I know which one would scare me more.

Unless they had both be previously around a 3 letter agency.

Then it may be more equal.

Even though Joe Biden told them they were "stupid bastards" at a rally, I'd feel far safer in a room full of veterans too!

originally posted by: namehere
we are a dangerous violent species that all wild animals are afraid of after all.

Some will attack you. Is it out of fear?

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: WeMustCare

He's leaving out that the majority of those service members were radicalized islamists.

So now, thanks to high-profile liberals like Lawrence O'Donnell, our men and women in uniform have to be extra cautious and in "self protect" mode in certain parts of our country?

Good Lord.

Looks like o'buma regime and the democrat gang got it backwards, it's literally the leftist extremist, who is a threat;

Napolitano Apologizes for Offending Veterans After DHS Eyes Them for 'Rightwing Extremism' |


"Their leftwing assessment identifies actual terrorist organizations, like the Earth Liberation Front and Animal Liberation Front," House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Lamar Smith, R-Texas, said in a statement issued Wednesday. "The rightwing report uses broad generalizations about veterans, pro-life groups, federalists and supporters of gun rights. That's like saying if you love puppies, you might be susceptible to recruitment by the Animal Liberation Front. It is ridiculous and deeply offensive to millions of Americans."

Dems get everything backwards and wrong, projection or incompetence?

Literally just rehashing the same BS from 2009... flinging poo again and hoping it sticks. Democrats are pathetic.

originally posted by: WeMustCare

So now, thanks to high-profile liberals like Lawrence O'Donnell, our men and women in uniform have to be extra cautious and in "self protect" mode in certain parts of our country?

Good Lord.

In fear of all those beta liberals? I think not. It's more of a F around and find out situation. Let them talk their crap... They don't have much else but to get their asses handed to them again from the election.

a reply to: WeMustCare

"Paranoid Liberals Believe U.S. Service Members are More Dangerous than Illegal Aliens."

Considering who ex-US Service Members take orders from.......the paranoid may be onto something.

Please fasten your seat belts, and make sure trays, are in the upright position. I am going to take y'all down a side road of this rabbit hole.

Social Issues & Civil Unrest, whom, who benefits from such?

In a 1966 essay published in The Nation, sociologists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven introduced the Cloward-Piven strategy, a political approach aimed at creating chaos to prompt a political crisis that could lead to legislation for a guaranteed annual income and an end to poverty.

Fast forward to the present day, and some argue that the events of the past year, including the COVID-19 pandemic and allegations of a rigged election, echo the principles of Cloward-Piven, resulting in a significant shift in American leadership and direction.

The objective of Cloward-Piven is clear: induce chaos and turmoil with the ultimate goal of recruiting the poor onto the welfare rolls.

According to the sociologists, a federal program of income redistribution becomes necessary to lift the poor en masse from poverty once chaos is established.

This perspective sheds light on recent developments, particularly the response to the pandemic and the measures taken by the government

The Cloward-Piven Strategy: A Blueprint for Chaos and Transformation

At the end of the article there was a tease for a future breakdown of The Cloward-Piven Strategy. This is that article. The end goal of the Cloward-Piven strategy is the creation of a political crisis leading to a guaranteed annual income.

The Hegelian Dialectic

Only two kinds of people can afford the luxury of acting on principle, those with absolute power and those with none and no desire to get any…everyone else who wants to be effective in politics has to learn to be ‘unprincipled’ enough to compromise in order to see their principles succeed. (Rogers 1990: 12)

Liberals in their meetings utter bold words; they strut, grimace belligerently, and then issue a weasel-worded statement ‘which has tremendous implications, if read between the lines.’ They sit calmly, dispassionately, studying the issue; judging both sides; they sit and still sit. (Alinsky 1971: 4)

The Radical may resort to the sword but when he does he is not filled with hatred against those individuals whom he attacks. He hates these individuals not as persons but as symbols representing ideas or interests which he believes to be inimical to the welfare of the people. (Alinsky 1946: 23)

Saul Alinsky the Rules For Radicals

The detour ends with this intersection, you can either return back to the surface, and forget this hidden exists. Or, can continue, guiding others, through the proverbial rabbit hole, and be a tour guide in this labyrinth.

a reply to: Cvastar

Biden knows they will turn on him and his lackeys in a heartbeat, if he does anything stupid over the next 2 weeks.