The truth lets admit it

a reply to: crayzeed

Dear Mr Naftalin, there's only one Sun in the universe????? No there is only one sun in our galaxy,

The number of stars in our galaxy "The Milky Way" is estimated to be in the range of 100 billion to 400 billion.

a reply to: crayzeed

Dear Mr Naftalin, there's only one Sun in the universe????? No there is only one sun in our galaxy, but in the universe, if you would care to look up at the night sky those stars you allude to are really Suns with their own galaxies.
Ah America, America, we are having these sightings in the UK and the government and the MSM have decide that it's those pesky Russians. You know those Russians that you're so frightened about taking the whole world over. Well after Ukraine.
FCD has come out with the answer but people inflate the information because it doesn't fit their paradigm.

lol

Dear crayzeed and everyone in future posters liking your comment. Please educate youself, you make yourself look uneducated.

I am not American and there is only one Sun in the whole universe. The Sun is a star. It is name of our local star. The Sun is a star but only one star is the Sun.

Can you understand?

Too: Lookup differences of this three term: solar system, galaxy, universe

a reply to: andy06shake

How many suns would that be?

originally posted by: SteamyAmerican

To think us hairy, semi-intelligent, sexy, violent beasts are the best the cosmos has to offer is childish, crude, and self-serving.

At best.

And I thought no one had even read my dating profile. Thanks.

originally posted by: crayzeed
Dear Mr Naftalin, there's only one Sun in the universe????? No there is only one sun in our galaxy, but in the universe, if you would care to look up at the night sky those stars you allude to are really Suns with their own galaxies.
Ah America, America, we are having these sightings in the UK and the government and the MSM have decide that it's those pesky Russians. You know those Russians that you're so frightened about taking the whole world over. Well after Ukraine.
FCD has come out with the answer but people inflate the information because it doesn't fit their paradigm.

I am sorry. There is so many garbage in this post, many backwards false things, I have to:

No there is only one sun in our galaxy, but in the universe (...)

There is exact ONE sun and it is our star. 'Sun' is a name for our local star.

if you would care to look up at the night sky those stars you allude to are really Suns with their own galaxies.

No. Some are stars and some are far away galaxy it look for our eyes like one point. Like plane with landing light far away, you see one light. It come close for landing, you see two light. On machines with two light.

"Suns" do not have own galaxies. Galaxies are made of cluster of stars.

FCD has come out with the answer but people inflate the information because it doesn't fit their paradigm.

Funny when I see you not understanding any thing about stars, solar systems, galaxy and the universe. In that order.

a reply to: Naftalin
My bad, I apologise, I should have said the sun in our solar system. But with each month more and more stars/suns have been identified including some with their own planetary systems. So I'll say again our Sun is not the only one in the universe.

a reply to: Naftalin

There is only one Sol

a reply to: crayzeed

Not need for apologize to me. I only come back because of you be so sure of what you say in way you say. No harm maked to me.

Yes of course the universe is full of star and many star have planet or others around them. This is where I not know more, like, is gas planet a planet or different name. I am not expert but how you wrote, it was so wrong.

And in my nature as German to korrekt it. I do not wanted be rude.

So I'll say again our Sun is not the only one in the universe

Our Sun is not the only star in the universe, agreed. How you say it: My son (star) Michael (the Sun) is not the only my son Michael in the universe.

Somehow imply you have another son named michael somewhere else in the universe, when before you say that your (our) as in singular, is the only one. Paradox.

a reply to: AlroyFarms

haha!

When I then talked about other SOLar systems, I was not correct in expression too. I need say star system!

You are right

I am hypocrite.

a reply to: Compendium

Those are some pretty bold claims you made there. I’ll keep my eyes out for your thread.

originally posted by: crayzeed

FCD has come out with the answer but people inflate the information because it doesn't fit their paradigm.

Are you talking about us or yourself?

Well, per this thread the ET believers, or now they call it NHI, those folks have always averred no, these aren’t drones their UFO/UAPs.

I mean a drone is just an unoccupied aerial vehicle---so who knows some midget ETs might be in those drones laughing their heads off.

a reply to: Naftalin

Between 100 billion to 400 billion by my guess.

But in our own star system, just the one sun as far as I'm aware.

You may find this article interesting though.

A team of Harvard astronomers have a wild new theory: the Sun used to have a companion star, making our solar system a binary one during its ancient history.

The astronomers say the theory could explain the formation of the Oort cloud, a theoretical cloud of dust and smaller objects in the distant regions of our solar system that many believe was created out of the left overs from the early solar system.

futurism.com...

a reply to: andy06shake

Hint: It is stars, not suns.

"sun" is the name of our star and only our star.

My use of solarsystems -in plural- was wrong too.

a reply to: Naftalin

Yeah, we tend to use the word sun to define our star and the word star for others.

But its also common to refer to a planet's sun for exoplanets.

That being said we also name other stars aka Rigel, Orion, Polaris.

Kind of interchangeable in some respects.

a reply to: Xtrozero

First, aliens don't need drones...

Not enough ......s at the end of that comment.

a reply to: Naftalin

Wasn't trying to be a smart ass as much as just applying Occam's Razor in this case.

I imagine most would find it odd that I actually believe in ET, but I just don't believe ET would waste his time an energy flirting around with drones flying around in the air over New Jersey. I don't disagree with what you say on any particular point, but here are a couple of counterpoints (not to argue, but to put into perspective what I am saying).

1. Yes, we fly drones to other planets, but they are almost always purpose driven. They either fly in a known orbit and take measurements, or they land on the surface and take measurements, samples and photographs.

2. I will concede this point. Perhaps ET has looked into our navigational history and feels this is the best way to hide, I don't know. All I will say is...lights are pretty superfluous for space travel, and they create weak spots in space craft, not to mention aerodynamic drag. Therefore, I remain doubtful.

3. I don't know this. But what I do know (or am fairly certain I know) is that ET doesn't come from this solar system. I'm confident we would know of an ET like civilization within our solar system by now. Therefore, my conclusion is based on the notion that ET (and I use the term "ET" generically) would send a vessel to a distant solar system in a similar form he would explore his own solar system with. Manned or un'manned'. Take Voyager 1 and 2 for example; they are both unmanned, but when you examine the craft(s), they are not much different than manned craft other than smaller, more compact and autonomous.

In the end, I could be all wrong, but my theory about ET is...he's already here, and has been for a very, very, long time. We just don't recognize him because humans are selfish, and humans believe ET is going to look like him (i.e. some semblance of 2 arms, 2 legs, a torso and a head). In reality, ET could be a bacteria, an airborne spore, or any number of a billion other things we don't recognize as another "life form".

I appreciate your confidence in my opinions, but sometimes I don't explain my reasoning well enough. My apologies.

a reply to: AlroyFarms

Gee, and I even acknowledged you and your statements.

Well, I stand by what I've said.

(P.S. - I know you don't particularly car for me, but that's okay).

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

I think it would be rather arrogant not to believe in aliens given the scope and vastness of our universe.

Whether they have been here through, or ever will, well there is that scope and scale again at play.

Contact would be the ticket.

As to the likes of disclosure, I'm not holding my breath.

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: AlroyFarms

Gee, and I even acknowledged you and your statements.

Well, I stand by what I've said.

(P.S. - I know you don't particularly car for me, but that's okay).

Relax FCD, we're good. Wanna know how good?

I am now publicly apologizing for years, yes years, of being a rude troll to you. You got the worst of my misguided frustrations and alcoholism, and even if I don't agree with everything you post, it was wrong of me to become an aggressor against you.

The post you're referring to wasn't an attack. It wasn't even directed at you, but homeboy who is accusing UFO believers of being superstitious or whatever the implication was. Do any of us really have the correct answer when it comes to fringe topics?

I was simply challenging the other poster to reexamine their own worldview and model of reality. To declare that any one of us came in with a 100% correct answer is foolish and I suspect you know this.

I regret my behaviors towards many people in the past, and you're overdo for an apology as well. I'm sorry FCD.

Let's move on and start a new chapter