Witnesses who will testify in next week's hearing on UAPs

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: Lazy88

originally posted by: putnam6

My hope it's another step towards slow disclosure.

My thought is a rouge government agency is using high end technology to illegally spy on citizens.

Probably if not highly likely all for the public safety, right...

More like nefarious political tracking and facial recognition by stealth drone and something about databases.

If I wasn’t lazy, I be a novelist. I came up with this story plot when you are born the government assigns a kill drone to you. One slip up by you, you meet a drone death. The future is so bright.

x.com...

Post

See new posts
Conversation
Reed Summers
@reedsummers7
Among the four witnesses testifying during Wednesday's Congressional UFO hearing, it appears that only Tim Gallaudet has provided pre-hearing written testimony. Here it is IN FULL, with key ideas or statements Bold:

"Chairwoman Mace, Chairman Grothman, Ranking Members Connolly and Garcia, and Members of the Committee, thank you for the opportunity to testify before you regarding unidentified anomalous phenomena, or UAP.

"Confirmation that UAPs are interacting with humanity came for me in January 2015 when I was serving as the Commander of the Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command. At the time, my personnel were participating in a pre-deployment naval exercise off the U.S. East Coast that included the USS Theodore Roosevelt Carrier Strike Group. This exercise was overseen by the United States Fleet Forces Command, led by a four-star admiral who also served as my superior officer.

"During this exercise, I received an email on the Navy’s secure network from the operations officer of Fleet Forces Command. The email was addressed to all subordinate commanders, and the subject line read in all capital letters: URGENT SAFETY OF FLIGHT ISSUE. The text of the email was brief but alarming, with words to the effect: “If any of you know what these are, tell me ASAP. We are having multiple near-midair collisions, and if we do not resolve it soon, we will have to shut down the exercise.”

"Attached to the email was what is now known as the “Go Fast” video, captured on the forward-looking infrared sensor onboard one of the Navy F/A-18 aircraft participating in the exercise. The now declassified video showed an unidentified object exhibiting flight and structural characteristics unlike anything in our arsenal. The implication of the email was clear: the author was asking whether any of the recipients were aware of classified technology demonstrations that could explain these objects. Because DoD policy is to rigorously deconflict such demonstrations with live exercises, I was confident this was not the case.

"The very next day, the email disappeared from my account and those of the other recipients without explanation. Moreover, the Commander of Fleet Forces and his operations officer never discussed the incident again, even during weekly meetings specifically designed to address issues affecting exercises like the one in which the Theodore Roosevelt Strike Group was participating.

"This lack of follow-up was concerning. As the Navy’s Chief Meteorologist at the time, my primary duty was to reduce safety-of-flight risks. Yet, it was evident that no one at the Flag Officer level was addressing the safety risks posed by UAPs. Instead, pilots were left to mitigate these threats on their own, without guidance or support.

"I concluded that the UAP information must have been classified within a special access program managed by an intelligence agency — a compartmented program that even senior officials, including myself, were not read into. Last year’s UAP hearing before this oversight committee confirmed that UAP-related information is not only being withheld from senior officials and members of Congress, but elements of the government are engaging in a disinformation campaign to include personal attacks designed to discredit UAP whistleblowers.

"For the remainder of my government service, including my time as an Under Secretary of Commerce and NOAA Administrator, this incident disturbed me. It highlighted a dangerous culture of over-classification, where even pressing safety-of-flight issues could be swept aside under the pretense of secrecy.

"Now, as a private citizen not bound by non-disclosure agreements regarding UAPs, I have become an advocate for greater transparency from the U.S. government and continue to speak out to validate the credibility of witnesses and other former government and military UAP whistleblowers.

"I do this for several reasons. First, there is a moral imperative. We know from last year’s UAP hearing and recent statements and publications by credible whistleblowers that UAP, NHI, and their technology of unknown origin (TUO) represent a new realization that we are not the only advanced intelligence in the universe. Unelected officials in the U.S. government do not have an exclusive right to this knowledge about the nature of reality. The American people have a right to that knowledge.

"There is a public safety requirement for more government UAP transparency. The safety of flight concerns regarding UAP are not limited to the military, and that is why I support Ryan Graves’ organization Americans for Safe Aerospace, which is calling for legislation requiring the FAA establish UAP reporting procedures.

"There is a national security need for more UAP transparency as well. In 2025, the U.S. will spend over $900 billion on national defense, yet we still have an incomplete understanding of what is in our airspace and water space. I add the term “water space” because UAP have been observed in the ocean and are known to exhibit transmedium travel through the air-sea interface. These are often referred to as unidentified submerged objects (USOs). Whether aerial or undersea, UAP are operating unhindered in our seas and skies, and American taxpayers have a right to know why our military’s massive budget is inadequately addressing this national defense deficiency.

"Additionally, more government UAP transparency has the potential to yield socioeconomic benefits through increased open research. Our present understanding of physics is not capable of explaining many observations of UAP, and more research might lead to unimaginable advances in energy, transportation, medicine, agriculture, not to mention the paradigm shift that NHI represent in areas such as astrobiology, psychology, sociology, and international relations. Such research is the mission of Harvard University’s Galileo Project, which I support as a research affiliate.

"Finally, and perhaps the most important reason, the failure of the Executive Branch to share UAP information with Congress is an infringement on the legislative branch that undermines separation powers and may be creating a constitutional crisis.

"The foundational issue is one of governance and public accountability. The continued excessive secrecy surrounding UAPs has not only hindered our ability to effectively address these phenomena but has also eroded trust in our institutions and compromised the safety of both military and civilian aviators. While recent initiatives, such as the establishment of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), NASA’s UAP study team, and research efforts by institutions like Harvard and Stanford, are positive steps forward, they are only the beginning. A more comprehensive approach is urgently needed—one that acknowledges the broader implications of UAP transparency across public safety, national security, and the socioeconomic opportunities that open research could unlock.

Thoughts or analysis please:
@TheUfoJoe

@planethunter56

@MikeColangelo

@UAPJames

#ufotwitter #ufoX #ufohearings

originally posted by: JJproductions
a reply to: putnam6

I saw this…

Senator Harry Reid


x.com...

a reply to: putnam6

It’s all going to come out soon!

I have seen some crazy things where I live. Here is a video from last Oct. I mad a thread about it!


m.youtube.com...

originally posted by: JJproductions
a reply to: putnam6

It’s all going to come out soon!

I have seen some crazy things where I live. Here is a video from last Oct. I mad a thread about it!


m.youtube.com...

I believe you, hell my daughter and I saw something zip across our windshield from left to right then shoot up straight up.
At first, I said did you see that and she described it as going from left to right and shooting up just as I had seen too

I thought light reflecting off the windshield till she pointed out her passenger-side window was down and we both watched it zip straight up, of course, I lost sight because of the roof but she said it took off like a bat out of hell till it blinked out of sight.

I know some like to be skeptical and I get it, but hell if the same chit was happening 10 years ago this place would be going bugchit talking about it.

Not to mention like yes of course there will be disinformation agents or those who just profit from thier podcasts and speaking, Ive been following this since the late 70s.

We can argue it's disclosure it's not disclosure but it is damn sure different than its ever been.

And Id like to discuss it like ATS used to discuss subjects such as this...

a reply to: putnam6

Wow that is amazing! You and your daughter had one amazing moment. I totally believe you and most people would too.

Some people will find everything that is wrong with what you saw!

I have a 16 year old, six years ago we saw something like you saw shoot across my windshield. He still talks about it today. Yes a good ATS old day dissuasion would be amazing!