New York State Government Kills Peanut the Squirrel and Fred the Raccoon

a reply to: baddmove

WoW! The exploitation!

The only legal fees involved are the $500 fine for each non-licensed wild animals seized, along with the euthanasia fee from the veterinarian.

Maybe $1600 total. But the Longos are setting up GoFundme and continuing to collect donations and I assume are still making bank off of the videos already posted. And now there's a benefit scheduled for Nov 8.

Money money money! Kaching! Jackpot!

And now a Republican Congressman is exploiting it to attack a Democrat Governor!!!

Newsflash!!! Department of Environmental Conservation has nothing to do with human Immigration or rape.

Here it comes . . . . . .

Can you imagine such a rabidly insane liberal being behind the confiscation and murder of your pets?

Can you imagine such a rabidly insane liberal being behind the confiscation and murder of your pets?

The question here is how does she have so much power to get so many high ups including a judge involved that led to the raid on their home and the confiscation and ultimately the deaths of their pets?

Just reporting a pet Squirrel doesn't justify that many assets they used for a wildlife complaint especially for a pet Squirrel.

Something is unknown here. There is much more to this story including how she was able to wield so much power on this case.

New York officials seized social media star Peanut the squirrel from its owner and killed it, becomes a political issue days before presidential elections

Squirrels, mice, and other small rodents have only very rarely been found to have rabies, and have never been known to transmit rabies to humans or other animals. In general, postexposure treatment is not recommended after a bite from one of these animals unless it is unusually vicious or appears obviously ill.

Never been known to transmit rabies to humans or other animals, but the idiots that raided their home killed it anyways.

Not one case is known of a squirrel transmitting rabies to any human or animal exists ANYWHERE. Proof of the government entities incompetence, and because of the death of the couple's pet also proves criminal overreach and negligence.

a reply to: FullHeathen

hells yea! they needed killing. (Texas defense) Imagine for a minute, a person with animals who WASN'T LISENCED TO HAVE THEM! THE HORROR! It's a wonder they didn't send swat in. Stupid squirrel.

originally posted by: FullHeathen
a reply to: baddmove

WoW! The exploitation!

The only legal fees involved are the $500 fine for each non-licensed wild animals seized, along with the euthanasia fee from the veterinarian.

So stupid, Trump would have shot them in the face for free.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: FullHeathen
a reply to: AdultMaleHumanUK

I'd definitely have crossed swords with that county's brown shirts over something.

Chemung County has a Republican Executive and 13 of its 15 Legislators are Republican.

Maybe that's why The State Agency New York State Department of Environmental Conservation attacked like they did!! 🦝️🥶️

Wow, that's a whole nother conspiracy can of worms there!!! 🤯

So it was the Democrat controlled State who rushed the killing then, not the Republican controlled County authority?

That does make it interesting, especially with the Judge you mentioned, who deemed to be overly passionate about quickly raising the raid teams, for the killing.

Did the County request the State involvement at all?

Am I being a bit too ATS-ish now, wondering if the State tried to set that County up to look like "This is what happens to animals in Republican controlled Counties"

I hope it backfires on their ass next week...and genuinely as an observer across the pond, I think our new authoritarian, woke robot, left wing leader, and government, will be a much more terrifying thing with the blessings of President Team Kamala!😱🤬😱

How much do you think this has to do with the fact that the owners have an popular only fans account?

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: FullHeathen
a reply to: baddmove

WoW! The exploitation!

The only legal fees involved are the $500 fine for each non-licensed wild animals seized, along with the euthanasia fee from the veterinarian.

So stupid, Trump would have shot them in the face for free.

Trumps not allowed to own a gun. Dude wants to be the leader of the most powerful military to ever exist… yet doesn’t even have the ability to shoot a poor little innocent squirrel.

What a crazy world.

Explains a lot

originally posted by: underpass61

Explains a lot

Actual fascism, brought to you by the Democrat party.

Them: "Trump admires Hitler!"

Reality: FDR, whom they worship, admired Hitler.

I’m thinking of making a Haitian joke here….

a reply to: underpass61

You're thinking of Dick Cheney.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: FullHeathen

hells yea! they needed killing. (Texas defense) Imagine for a minute, a person with animals who WASN'T LISENCED TO HAVE THEM! THE HORROR! It's a wonder they didn't send swat in. Stupid squirrel.

I’ve lived in apartments where the landlord didn’t have permits for their cockroaches. Wish the law would had euthanized those critters.

a reply to: xuenchen

Actually ridiculous that they just euthanized the squirrel instead of giving him the rabies vaccine.

originally posted by: i664k
a reply to: xuenchen

Actually ridiculous that they just euthanized the squirrel instead of giving him the rabies vaccine.

I’m surprised they didn’t mandate it(vaccine) for the country. You know, squirrels might bite grandma.