ABC Broadcasts Election results on "Accident"

I remember this happening (on Fox news?) a few days before the 2020 election.

Then, Fox news called the election before all votes were tallied.

I think this is an insider trying to warn us!

a reply to: TheTardis2

Doesn't something like this happen every Presidential election?

originally posted by: tamusan
Doesn't something like this happen every Presidential election?

If you're only talking about the last two Presidential elections, yes it does happen every Presidential election.

originally posted by: SourGrapes
I remember this happening (on Fox news?) a few days before the 2020 election.

Then, Fox news called the election before all votes were tallied.

I think this is an insider trying to warn us!

RE: www.abovetopsecret.com...

Thanks for confirming. It's all coming back to me now. Fox News corporation was in collusion with Arizona election officials. They called Arizona for BIDEN on election night, even though the A.P. said Arizona was too close to call...for 3 days!

When information began leaking out about this, the governor of Arizona (Doug Ducey) announced he would not seek re-election.

Similar fraud evidence began leaking out in Pennsylvania too, which is why the Secretary of State suddenly resigned 2 months after the 2020 election.

If it was a test and it had no substantial meaning out side of a test why not make the numbers 50/50 you know or 0 because it’s a test….

a reply to: TheTardis2

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: TheTardis2

Looks like a local news station testing out their graphics, and accidentally let it air.

Here’s the thing about real conspiracies, it’s got to have a small enough circle you know nothing will leak.

If the media knew something was being rigged, we’re talking about thousands, or tens of thousands assuming even local stations are in on it. While those institutions themselves lean left, not everyone inside of the organizations do. Someone would surely come forth with evidence.

This reminds me of when they accidentally show an obituary type write up on a public figure who’s still alive. They have those profiles ready to go for high profile figures so they’re ready to pounce on the story when it does happen.

out of curiosity, what would "evidence" look like? Perhaps the election being called days before it starts?

I understand this is likely just a test image, but it's fishy, and should not be discounted and hand waived away. Even if the debt is high.

a reply to: network dude

Evidence I imagine would be communication between the local news outlet and whoever is feeding them numbers.

Why would they get fed bad numbers ahead of time and risk being exposed for conspiracy? There are tens of thousands of people who work at local news stations. There’s no way to vet them or know who would whistle blow. Plus, if the numbers are rigged, you could just give the rigged data on election night and avoid that unnecessary exposure.

My company tested our ordering, invoicing, and billing platform for a year before it got implemented. Every order, invoice and bill got double entered in the now old system and the replacement to make sure everything matched for a long period of time before the switch was made.

It’s not even weird to me a local news station with a small staff (relative to cable news) would have to do some tests ahead of election night. But having all of those sub 100k a year earners in on it is just opening yourself up to trouble for no reason.

This isn't fake either. The tv station issued a statement that it was a test with random numbers...🤔

They show sports scores and weather reports on screen all the time so why the need to test the system?

Probably a teen age or early twenties person doing a prank to see if anyone is paying attention.

I have known of a few people who would pull a prank like that over the years, some people get let go from their jobs for doing stuff like that.

I bet some viewers got a chuckle out of that. But they have a story to tell for forty years about it.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Lazy88

I doubt that would be newsworthy.

Which has what to do with I personally never seen the school closing and the ticker for football games tested?

Again. Old technology they don’t have down? Again it’s like doing a test text before you text? And they still make mistakes election night.



www.deseret.com...

Why not just put name one, name two. 50 percent / 50 percent. If they were worried about getting names right, wouldn’t they run through all the actual candidates names for that state?

originally posted by: Bluntone22


They show sports scores and weather reports on screen all the time so why the need to test the system?

originally posted by: Bluntone22
This isn't fake either. The tv station issued a statement that it was a test with random numbers...🤔

They show sports scores and weather reports on screen all the time so why the need to test the system?

Correct. You can see their statement here.

a reply to: Lazy88

Like a text, they do sports tickers all the time. There’s always sports, so you’re basically resting in action.

But national elections are every two years. Like everything with software there are updates in between.

And also, you have all of that info feeding into a map.

As to why they don’t do 50/50 with no names, how would that test show if the formulas are working for who’s winning the state based off of counties?

To me, the question comes down to two possibilities:

1. Those rigging the election fed numbers to a small time local news station.

2. Local news station with small staff making sure everything is working properly ahead of election night.

We all laughed when the left came up with wild theories surrounding Russiagate… I don’t see how claims like this that are far fetched are much different.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

This could be the first accident that is incorrect. We will know in about seven or eight days.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Lazy88


But national elections are every two years.

It’s all the same technology and equipment. They don’t have a school closing ticker, vs a separate sports ticker vs a separate election ticker.

Well it’s an election, get out and hook up the ticker machine just for elections. 🤪

a reply to: CriticalStinker

The same system that did this graphic…



Is probably the same system that does this..

a reply to: Lazy88

It’s all the same technology and equipment.

Maybe, I don’t work there, so I can’t say with confidence.

But I just imagine elections are different than showing school closures, sports, weather. For one, all of those things are independent of one another. The score of one game doesn’t affect the score of another, same with weather.

Are they putting in the numbers locally, or being fed from national ABC? Are they going to have the numbers tie into a real time map?

Again, this comes down to what’s more plausible? You find it laughable they’d need to test something they only use every two years (when they do weather and sports daily/weekly)… Yet you’re willing to humor they already know the election results, and accidentally aired it.

You and I are just in disagreement of which of those are more likely. I doubt either of us are going to change our minds.

I just don’t see how local news stations would be trusted with such a secret that is a crime. To me it just seems more likely a small local operation would be testing stuff a few days out from and election because they want everything to go right 🤷‍♂️

originally posted by: Bluntone22
This isn't fake either. The tv station issued a statement that it was a test with random numbers...🤔

They show sports scores and weather reports on screen all the time so why the need to test the system?

They count on people being gullible and believing what "authorities" tell them...even crooked authorities working at the TV station itself.

For example: www.abovetopsecret.com... was started when FOX Arizona showed the Governor election going to Democrat Katie Hobbs...days before election day.

The "fix" is always rigged in advance. Not on election day. If something slips out, an "authority" explains it, most Americans buy it, and it's totally forgotten. (Except at ATS) 😁😡

a reply to: WeMustCare

The "fix" is always rigged in advance.

Except when you’re happy with the results?

Reminds me of that reporter that said Building 7 had fallen, as the live footage showed it burning behind her.