Iran Sympathizers in Biden Admin Leak Intelligence on Israel Attack Plans

originally posted by: onestonemonkey

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Israel is going to stop trusting the US or else use the US to leak phony intel to the Iranians.

The way relations between Netenyahu and Biden have been going I would be surprised if the Israelis are not feeding them disinfo.

The "leak" was probably done as a form of punishment by Biden co. because they really don't want Israel to hit Iran in any substantial(and justified)way.

So now Iran are adjusting their defences on what may be disinfo..

Bingo!

There are a Huge Number of Criminals in DC that should be tried for Treason.
Biden and crew for sure.
a reply to: charlest2

a reply to: bluesman023

This one may be exposed…

Ariane Tabatabai is the chief of staff of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations. She is also an officer in US Naval Intelligence.
She has access to all naval movements and all special forces operations in the world, and specifically in the Middle East.

Pic with more details at X link.

x.com...

And…

Some familiar names from previous reports appear in the new one: Mostafa Zahrani, a senior Iranian foreign ministry diplomat with strong ties to IRGC, and Ariane Tabatabaei, currently at Pentagon, whose close and extensive ties with the regime have raised many eyebrows, and led to calls for revocation of her security clearance –as has happened with her mentor, Robert Malley, who until a year ago was Joe Biden’s Iran envoy.

www.iranintl.com...

a reply to: YourFaceAgain

Biden Obama...pallets of cash to Iran... hundreds of millions of dollars.

Justice is coming for both of them.. and others involved in that scheme.

a reply to: WeMustCare

That was frozen bank assets that we had for part of the nuclear deal.

It was failed diplomacy, but we didn’t “give” them money. We unfroze it.

People act like that tipped the scale and created the environment in the Middle East now… but the reality is the toppling of Saddam created a power vacuum in the Middle East allowing Iran to consolidate power.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: WeMustCare

That was frozen bank assets that we had for part of the nuclear deal.

It was failed diplomacy, but we didn’t “give” them money. We unfroze it.

People act like that tipped the scale and created the environment in the Middle East now… but the reality is the toppling of Saddam created a power vacuum in the Middle East allowing Iran to consolidate power.

That money was marked to go to victims of 911 if I remember, and that got squashed by Iran sympathizers and bribe recipients.

originally posted by: matafuchs
A real leak. Has anyone been raided or indicted yet?

no, but the good news is, the guy who was in charge of finding out who's bag of coke was in the white house, has been tapped to find the leaker, so rest assured, the guilty will be treated accordingly, and proper punishments will be equally as severe as those levied against the one's responsible for the Afgan withdraw.

In other words, this is not over, and nobody is going to get in any trouble. It's Trump's fault.

What else can democrats do make themselves look like the traitors they are, I will call them evil incarnated, they will destroy America.

That is their goal.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: WeMustCare

That was frozen bank assets that we had for part of the nuclear deal.

It was failed diplomacy, but we didn’t “give” them money. We unfroze it.

People act like that tipped the scale and created the environment in the Middle East now… but the reality is the toppling of Saddam created a power vacuum in the Middle East allowing Iran to consolidate power.

No it was not. That money was from the previous regime. It had nothing to do with the current regimes nuclear program, until it was used to pay them from allegedly stopping that program. Which they did not do!

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: WeMustCare

That was frozen bank assets that we had for part of the nuclear deal.

It was failed diplomacy, but we didn’t “give” them money. We unfroze it.

People act like that tipped the scale and created the environment in the Middle East now… but the reality is the toppling of Saddam created a power vacuum in the Middle East allowing Iran to consolidate power.

That money was marked to go to victims of 911 if I remember, and that got squashed by Iran sympathizers and bribe recipients.

If it’s frozen money it’s not marked to go to anyone. The funds have been frozen since the revolution. Part of the nuclear deal was giving them some of the money back with the interest it accrued.

Why would frozen Iranian money have anything to do with 9/11? Saudi Arabia had more to do with 9/11 than Iraq or Iran.

Who has been apologizing for Iran? They’ve had attacks on their soil, we’ve put multiple carrier groups in the region, and deployed more troops to the area, including some on Israeli soil to prevent Iran from a counter attack to the imminent Israeli strike. That would pretty much guarantee our involvement should the THAD sites get struck.

originally posted by: hangedman13

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: WeMustCare

That was frozen bank assets that we had for part of the nuclear deal.

It was failed diplomacy, but we didn’t “give” them money. We unfroze it.

People act like that tipped the scale and created the environment in the Middle East now… but the reality is the toppling of Saddam created a power vacuum in the Middle East allowing Iran to consolidate power.

No it was not. That money was from the previous regime. It had nothing to do with the current regimes nuclear program, until it was used to pay them from allegedly stopping that program. Which they did not do!

It was frozen Iranian assets. I never said from which regime.

The US started the Iranian nuclear program in the 60’s. We built them a nuclear reactor.

Not everything can be boiled down to the last decade, much less two.

Everyone is so hell bent on figuring out how every geopolitical matter translates to US domestic 2 party politics. It’s rarely that easy.

a reply to: WeMustCare

Is more than that, while the frozen money was unfroze for iran, billions were still flowing to Iran thanks to biden relax oil enforcement sanctions.

Yes America under biden enable Iran to make to from 32 to 35 billion dollars, that help finance the attacks on Israel on October 7.

Biden Keeps the Billions Flowing to Iran
Choosing not to enforce oil sanctions finances Tehran’s terrorism. You’d think the Biden Administration would have realized by now that enriching the Iranian regime is a dangerous mistake. You’d be wrong. Relaxed U.S. enforcement of oil sanctions continued through October, refilling Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s coffers even after the Oct. 7 slaughter and the more than 40 attacks on U.S. troops by Iran’s proxies in the weeks since.

Iran exported nearly 1.4 million barrels of oil per day in October, sustaining its average for 2023. This is up 80% from the 775,000 barrels per day Iran averaged under the Trump Administration’s “maximum pressure” strategy, according to United Against Nuclear Iran, the group of former U.S. Ambassador Mark Wallace and Sen. Joe Lieberman, whose Tanker Tracker generates the best public data we have.

The Iranian surge in oil exports since President Biden took over has brought Iran an additional $32 billion to $35 billion, according to the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. The calculations are tricky, but the cause of the Iranian windfall is clear: As part of Mr. Biden’s quiet diplomacy with Iran, the U.S. has curtailed sanctions enforcement. Customers and middlemen have concluded the risk is low and the discount on Iran’s oil is too good to pass up.

Biden is the gift that keeps on giving to terrorist sponsoring countries like Iran.

So they can keep financing attacks on our troops and Israel.

True will be known.

www.msn.com... r-AA1sc8P2

www.wsj.com...

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Iran ordered to pay billions to relatives of 9/11 victims

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: YourFaceAgain

What exactly pro Iran did this administration or Obamas do? Let's clarify your claim.

Obama gave them 1.7 billion for some bs settlement listed below, in cash. I think it’s a crock o chit but there it is.

Trump also claimed that Obama gave Iran “1.8 Billion Dollars in CASH!” Facts First: This is roughly true. As part of a settlement, Obama transferred $1.7 billion in cash to Iran in 2016. The administration also used the money to pressure Iran to release several American prisoners. The Obama administration maintained that the payments were made as a reimbursement to Iran for military equipment that the country had purchased from the US in the late 1970s but the US never delivered on. The entire $1.7 billion, given in two separate payments of $400 million and $1.3 billion, was provided in cash. The timing of the first payment corresponded with Iran’s release of the American prisoners, which occurred the same day. While Obama repeatedly said in early August 2016 that the money was not part of a ransom for these Americans, the administration later admitted that the timing of the first installment was used as leverage to get the prisoners released.

Obama also unfroze between 50 - 150 billion in funds

The Iran Deal unlocked Iranian assets that were previously frozen due to sanctions, but it’s unclear how much those assets were worth – $150 billion is the highest estimate provided by US officials and it’s thought that Iran could not have accessed all of that money because much of it was tied up in projects overseas.

www.cnn.com...

Biden released 6 billion last year in a prisoner release deal. Yep, Obama and Biden have both kept Iran in funds, which if I had to guess, a large amount ended up in terrorists hands such as Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthi’s and who knows who else.

And as marg already posted Biden has kept the cash flowing with Irans oil exports

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: hangedman13

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: WeMustCare

That was frozen bank assets that we had for part of the nuclear deal.

It was failed diplomacy, but we didn’t “give” them money. We unfroze it.

People act like that tipped the scale and created the environment in the Middle East now… but the reality is the toppling of Saddam created a power vacuum in the Middle East allowing Iran to consolidate power.

No it was not. That money was from the previous regime. It had nothing to do with the current regimes nuclear program, until it was used to pay them from allegedly stopping that program. Which they did not do!

It was frozen Iranian assets. I never said from which regime.

The US started the Iranian nuclear program in the 60’s. We built them a nuclear reactor.

Not everything can be boiled down to the last decade, much less two.

Everyone is so hell bent on figuring out how every geopolitical matter translates to US domestic 2 party politics. It’s rarely that easy.

And giving funds to a hostile regime is not smart policy. Key word in your reply, WE BUILT THEM A REACTOR. The previous regime not the current one. So those funds were not for the current regime. So we paid the current regime money from the previous one, for a nuclear program that deviates from what was done decades ago? Big difference between building a reactors for energy needs and a program for weapon development. That money had no reason to be unfrozen in the first place!

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Iran ordered to pay billions to relatives of 9/11 victims

That happened in 2018.

The pallets of cash went to Iran under Obama.

More assets were unfrozen in 2023 under Biden for a deal with Iran.

The court had 5 years to allocate those funds if that’s truly what their goal was. But I can’t find anything that said it was marked to pay out 9/11 victims before being unfrozen.

a reply to: hangedman13

Not all the frozen money was pre Ayatollah. Some was an oil deal with South Korea.

I said it was failed diplomacy and think it was the wrong move. But attempts at diplomacy don’t always equate to being an apologist for an adversary.

The same charged rhetoric was used against Trump for talks with Putin and North Korea. I think it just clouds the waters when people make every geopolitical event politicized under our domestic lens.

Again, the single biggest event for Iran was the fall of their enemy, Iraq. That opened up a huge part of the region for them to get proxy fighters and one less power they had to worry about. That’s not me trying to put it on one party considering both voted for it.

Have we or have we not put multiple carrier groups in the region, tens of thousands of troops, and intercepted more Iranian munitions heading towards Israel than they got themselves? So how is it we’re somehow friends with Iran?

To me, it seems like rhetoric used to goad the American people into thinking we’re not doing enough for Israel, and essentially pull us into direct conflict with Iran. I’m all for supporting Israel, but I don’t think we need to have a war with Iran to show an ally support.

Can we just agree that NO money should have been transferred to a country with direct connections to killing US soldiers?


Obama and Biden conceded where another POTUS left his solution in a pile of blood on a tarmac in IRaq?

a reply to: matafuchs

Can we just agree that NO money should have been transferred to a country with direct connections to killing US soldiers?

I agree, but I doubt we’d see Saudi Arabia dropped from the US.

If we were really splitting hairs, that could put Israel in a bad position for the USS Liberty. Though, that was most likely an accident.

a reply to: KrustyKrab

Obama didn't "give" them the money. Iran went to an International Tribunal. And instead of possibly have to pay Iran billions of dollars if we fought them in the tribunal. They decided to settle. So it's a catch 22 situation. Pay them the 400 million or perhaps pay them billions. What would you have liked to have happened?