posted on Oct, 20 2024 @ 11:49 AM
a reply to:
gortex
Ok, let's break down this video into positives and negatives of the information.
Positives:
The signal lasted for hours, this eliminates low Earth orbit satellites.The source remained fixed to the stars, this eliminates geosynchronous
satellites. In either of these, the source would seem to move, neither is the case. This would also seem to eliminate ground sources as they would be
fixed to a point relative to the Earth rather than a star.
The source is far enough off the ecliptic to eliminate deep space probes. There is nothing interesting enough in that direction to send a probe out
there within this solar system.
Negatives:
If you don't know what frequency a signal is supposed to be, you can't possibly know if it is Doppler shifted unless it passes by, comes towards you
then goes away. Doppler shift correction is used where a satalirlte signal is a higher frequency approaching a ground station then lower as it moves
away. This signal is said to be moving away but with nothing to compair to, there is no way to detect this.
The phased array system is only useful for planned observations. That is they have to point the radio telescopes at the same target at the same time.
It is impossible to use that technology to examine a recorded signal from one radio telescope when no others were receiving it simultaneously.
Conclusion:
The video is technically inept in applying technological processes and techniques that are not applicable to the signal.
While the signal and its analysis is very interesting, the presentation is just so much nonsense as to cover up the possible significance of the true
findings.
In other words, interesting story spoiled by the presentation.
edit on 20-10-2024 by BeyondKnowledge3 because: (no reason given)