ATTENION ATTENTION - 150k to kill the former President of the United States

Wow that is how much the democrats value Trumps life?, can you imagine if they raise the bid to 1 million, the Vegas mob are having a blast with the betting, I am sure.

Trump better wear a anti shot glass all over him because the nut jobs are plenty.

a reply to: Dalamax

Yeah dal, I understand just how crazy that sounds to the majority of the population here, yet, I post it anyway, as I have now for a while. What you read in those few sentences could just be plain crazy but by looking at it in another light, very very sound. I'ts an old old ploy. Sacrifice something or some one and blame the enemy, surely you know this. The bigger the sacrifice the bigger the backlash. Certainly I don't need to make a list for you or anyone else here on when and by whom this has been utilized. It's power, not leftist or rightist but plain old power that we are dealing with.

a reply to: SteamyAmerican


Steamy. One guys dead and the other ain't going nowhere. If it were you or I, neither would we, even though hopefully both of us are sane, unlike those two sad sacks.

a reply to: SteamyAmerican

I don’t watch the news for specifically that reason. Honestly, I don’t know anyone who turns on the TV to get the news unless it’s local.

Yes, there are bias news agencies out there. It’s not a new concept. I believe it was Chomsky that really started up that debate in modern culture, albeit a different angle. Still, he framed the idea as they were the fourth branch of the government.

But we have the internet now and access to a much wider variety, and without having to catch them on their schedule.

But I never see the right complain of bias when it works in their favor. Twitter used to be enemy number one, now musk is in their good graces with his endorsement and support.

I don’t imply the government should interject, people should just pick what they consume. Personally I consume both from the left and right leaning news, just not the hyperbolic ones who get engagement with blatant punditry.

It’s smoke and mirrors Terry.

A microcosm of distraction from the corrupt skullduggery being established in the ol’ USSA.

Plain old power resides with the individual and this is a projection of perversion. Privatise the profits, socialise the loses 👍

a reply to: BingoMcGoof

BAMN

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
a reply to: Dalamax

Yeah dal, I understand just how crazy that sounds to the majority of the population here, yet, I post it anyway, as I have now for a while. What you read in those few sentences could just be plain crazy but by looking at it in another light, very very sound. I'ts an old old ploy. Sacrifice something or some one and blame the enemy, surely you know this. The bigger the sacrifice the bigger the backlash. Certainly I don't need to make a list for you or anyone else here on when and by whom this has been utilized. It's power, not leftist or rightist but plain old power that we are dealing with.

Yea okay. It's not like democrats are pleased that first Trump went to the "otherside" second that their paid for dossier didn't prevent his first election win. Third all of their little plans, yes plans, didn't work while he was in office. Remember the "insurance" from the lovebirds about Trump? The two idiots who somehow where awarded money for invasion of privacy for having an affair and using their government OWNED PHONES to do it? Not like there have not been patterns that keep emerging from the left over Trump. That ABC production of J6 footage for the hearing? Yea its more believable the right is sacrificing Trump.

Before we entered clown world, the sitting president would be addressing the nation about these attempts at least a couple times by now.

a reply to: CriticalStinker
Fair points. All around.

And I agree, I don’t watch the news for the same reason.

I laugh whenever I see The Atlantic write articles with headlines “Why does the media continue to give Trump a pass”, or “How to Write about the Trump years.”.

Like yeah, okay.