It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
How do I move past this , how do I accept that other people's lives are not my responsibility . I cannot help but imagine her suffering when I’m trying to imagine a bright future for my family and I.
Do you also feel the pain and suffering of the 6 billon others that have a worst life than you do? Do you feel they are your responsibility too?
I call this the Bady Jesscia syndrome. In 1986 Baby Jessica fell down a small well, and it took tremendous effort to rescue her. The whole country watched in real time crying out to save her and when they pulled her out everyone cheered.
But what about the other 80,000 children that go missing or worst each year? Nothing...
When we focus on one then it is a big deal to us, but we don't care about all the others because they are not directly in our reality. I would say provide care and help at whatever level you can and tell yourself you at least help a little.
The other day an old lady was stuck at the gas pump with an empty tank, and her debit card wasn't working. She came up to me and was frantic and said she had to get her granddaughter, her card wasn't working, she had no gas..... etc All I said was "do you need gas?" She looked at me and just said...yes. I said OK not a big deal and pumped 40 bucks into her car and said have a nice day. Sometimes little things are big.
Many in our generation have lost faith in human institutions—government, laws, science, religion, marriage, and in people. Where to turn to fill the vacuum? Many are turning inward, to themselves. It is not new. It is only a revival.
THE creed of today’s me-firsters is relatively new for the 20th century. It rejects the regard-for-others approach that was more common earlier in this century. That code of ethics taught persons to think of others, to do good to others, to encourage them, and to fit oneself in with others. All of that is taboo with the new cult of “King Me.” While this extreme may be new for this century, it is not really new—only a revival. It is very ancient history repeating itself.
Here is a sampling of the new code of ethics, as gleaned from the current crop of self-help and self-awareness books:
“Looking out for number one.”
“Winning through intimidation.”
“Few of us learn how to use the world, instead of being used by it.”
“While it is possible to act in the best interests of others, the important thing to understand is that that will never be your primary objective.”
“Morality has very little to do with success.”
“You have the right to judge your own behavior.”
“Resolve to live up to a code of ethics that is self-determined, not one that has been imposed by others.”
“Guilt is an addictive drug as strong and as destructive as heroin.”
“Are you letting people walk all over you?”
“Revolutionary new techniques for getting your own way.”
When such pronouncements are made in the pages of the books, they are cushioned in a context that relieves them of their harshness. Often sound principles are presented that are helpful, and the intention here is not to categorize the entire contents as rank selfishness. However, the tenor of these books is exemplified by the above-quoted admonitions and query. These are the ideas seized on for the ads and jackets of the books to entice readers. These are the sentiments used as titles. These are the impressions left on readers. The mood permeating the followers of the new movement is one of exalting the individual in contrast to society in general. The same self-centeredness is found in movies, television, athletics, newspapers and magazines.
The Self-Awareness Workshops
...
Television’s New Religion: “Feelgoodism”
...