Sen. Johnson Asks the CDC How Many Americans Were Killed by COVID Shots

These questions are getting asked, no matter how much a of fit the leftists throw. They are no better than children throwing a tempter tantrum, this is the result of the participation trophy generation... remember this was brought to you by corrupt career PARASITE politicans, who want to replace Americans with illegal aliens. Are you starting to see what was called out years ago?

If Ron Johnson (R-WI) is not your favorite US Senator yet, maybe he will be after you read this story. Sen. Johnson has sent a letter to the heads of the FDA and the CDC, asking them for the data on how many Americans have been killed by the Pfizer and Moderna COVID shots. A Member of Congress finally “went there.”

Some of us were not sure whether we would ever see the day when this happened. The CDC and the FDA have this data. They just don’t want the public to know how many Americans were killed by their “safe and effective” jabs.

Steve Kirsch, who has really done a lot of valuable research into the COVID shot saga, was able to obtain gold-standard government health data from the Czech Republic earlier this year. As usual, it caused a firestorm when Kirsch announced his analysis of the data. Diagnostic pathologist Dr. Clare Craig analyzed the data as well and came to the same conclusion as Kirsch: The COVID shots are killing people, and the Moderna shot is even more dangerous than the Pfizer one.

Leftist dems lied how many people died?

Only the ignorant will deny truth.

Deny ignorance.

a reply to: ADVISOR

Only the ignorant will deny truth.

Deny ignorance.

So no actual link to the data then???

a reply to: Kurokage

Yes.

Do you see those Blue letters in the quoted section above?

Click them. They are URL embedded in the text.
It's a link feature.

JUST THE OLD FOLKS SENTENCED TO REST HOMES WHO DIED because of COVID WOULD MAKE MOST CARING PEOPLE WINCE. ISOLATED AND FAMILY MEMBERS CAN NOT VISIT.... IDIOTS IN CHARGE ...WHAT IS NEW ?
From your link

[exnewsThis is a much more serious smoking gun than it may sound like. If the shots were “safe and effective,” ACM rates should be flat between Moderna and Pfizer recipients. They’re not. While the Pfizer shot has killed far more people in sheer numbers, that’s because it was administered in greater numbers. The Moderna shots killed more people as a percentage, which means it is even more dangerous than Pfizer’s.]

a reply to: ADVISOR

Do you see those Blue letters in the quoted section above?

Thats a link to a story, not the actual data!

Deny Ignorance??

originally posted by: ADVISOR
a reply to: Kurokage

Yes.

Do you see those Blue letters in the quoted section above?

Click them. They are URL embedded in the text.
It's a link feature.

I did click the link. It still didn't have any actual statistics at all.

There was a link to an X post from RFK Jr. that suggested that there was about 29 sudden cardiac deaths a month, prior to COVID immunizations, and that there were "hundreds" now (still not a definite number).

Also, myocardial inflammation is most often attributed to viruses, even years before the pandemic, it was known fact.

And there is this particular virus, SARS-CoV-2, that has been in epidemic numbers in roughly the same time-frame as the shots, and is known to be a major contributory cause of sudden cardiac deaths.

So it's a bit biased to suggest that a rise in myocarditis and sudden cardiac deaths were due only to the shots, when a far more likely culprit is COVID-19 disease itself (and the rise in sudden cardiac deaths in athletes began before the mRNA immunizations were rolled out):

SARS-CoV-2 Cardiac Involvement in Young
Competitive Athletes (This study was published before the shots became available in the USA).

COVID-19, Myocarditis, and Cardiac MRI in Athletes: Distinguishing Signal from Noise (This was published 4 months after the mRNA immunizations were available, but was a study of data collected prior to the availability of the shots).

a reply to: ADVISOR

Yeah, links to right-wing opinion pieces hardly constitute actual evidence.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: ADVISOR

Yeah, links to right-wing opinion pieces hardly constitute actual evidence.

Trust in products with ZERO medium or long term testing data hardly constitute actual evidence of safety (or effectiveness)
I know
I know.
"But CNN and Fauci said...."

originally posted by: Tolkien

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: ADVISOR

Yeah, links to right-wing opinion pieces hardly constitute actual evidence.

Trust in products with ZERO medium or long term testing data hardly constitute actual evidence of intelligence.

Fixed it for ya

a reply to: ADVISOR

remember this was brought to you by corrupt career PARASITE politicans, who want to replace Americans with illegal aliens.

Wasn’t Operation Warpspeed a Trump endeavor?

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: ADVISOR

Do you see those Blue letters in the quoted section above?

Thats a link to a story, not the actual data!

Deny Ignorance??

You mean embrace ignorance?

The CDC won't release the data.

That's kinda the point.

Sort of like how the FDA wanted 75 years to release the trial data so that the deaths Pfizer excluded from the vaccine arm wouldn't be discovered. At least, not discovered until they'd made lots of money forcing a junk product on babies and children that have virtually zero risk of serious illness from COVID.

No American children should be forced to take an unnecessary therapy, with any risk of adverse events and especially fatal ones, to provide pharmaceutical companies with liability shields. Their parents shouldn't be denied informed consent, nor should anybody else.

All of you that continue to defend the opacity of informed consent data while the US forces it on children for the sake of corporate profits deserve whatever karma sends your way. It takes really special people to advocate for children to be subjected to forced medical treatments without any regard for medical ethics and informed consent.

If you wondered what you would have done when the Nazis starting violating human rights, now you know. You'd be smearing anybody that dare criticize it publicly or ridiculing people questioning the government's role in harming citizens. Welcome to the wrong side of history. There have never been violations of informed consent that turned out to be the right choice, ever in history. Ask a thalidomide survivor how it works out when the government won't release data and refuses to investigate adverse events.

originally posted by: ADVISOR

Only the ignorant will deny truth.

Or the severely remorseful. I think a lot more people should be outraged, but it's become quite clear that water fluoridation WORKS.

How else can you explain the massive, unwarranted restraint by the general public? "They're just good people"???

More to it than that I'm afraid, imo.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

Wasn’t Operation Warpspeed a Trump endeavor?

He didn't make the so called vaccines though.

Would you think better of him if he had done nothing?

a reply to: burntheships

Obviously we have hindsight now, so it’s not so much a judgment I’m placing on the decision itself. It was different context then.

But I guess it’s just odd to me how anything bad can just be assigned to political opponents, while dodging any culpability. That’s not exclusive of this instance, or even one party.

But when people talk about the vaccine, they omit Trump championed it. When people talk about inflation, we ignore one of the biggest debt one term admins. We ignore the amount of money that was printed and pumped into the market.

Is he worse than the rest? I don’t think so. Is he vastly better? I don’t think so. I think what we see is both parties having more in common then not.

a reply to: ksihkahe

You mean embrace ignorance?

If thats what you choose to do????

www.cdc.gov...

www.cdc.gov...

Just a very quick glance and some data is avalible and out there...

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

But I guess it’s just odd to me how anything bad can just be assigned to polititcal opponents, while dodging any culpability. That’s not exclusive of this instance, or even one party.

What was exclusive to the Dems' was the vaccine
"Mandate"... a little hard to get around the fact that
the Biden admin who took it all the way to the SCOTUS
forcing the vaccine on just about everyone who worked,
went to school, was in the military, or wanted to be
in public without a mask.

But when people talk about the vaccine, they omit Trump championed it. When people talk about inflation, we ignore one of the biggest debt one term admins. We ignore the amount of money that was printed and pumped into the market.

It wasn't wrong to hope a vaccine would provide immunity
for Covid. I mean, all of the traditional vaccines are required
for grade school children seems like forever now. I think Trump
has questioned the schedules of said vaccines, and a lot of people
appreciated the fact that a POTUS hopeful would even dare to
breach the subject.

As far as debt is concerned, the Feds have been printing
money for who knows how long. The only POTUS hopeful
that ever even tried to get the public interested in that
was Ron Paul. So why single Trump out for what has been
the "standard" for decades?

Is he worse than the rest? I don’t think so. Is he vastly better? I don’t think so. I think what we see is both parties having more in common then not.

The rest of previous presidents? Or hopefuls?

If one can not see the vast difference between the
last four years, compared to 2016-2020 there is not
much reason to even have that discussion.

a reply to: burntheships

As far as debt is concerned, the Feds have been printing money for who knows how long. The only POTUS hopeful that ever even tried to get the public interested in that was Ron Paul. So why single Trump out for what has been the "standard" for decades?

I didn’t single him out, I said I found it odd he’s considered some sort of economic god when he did the same thing everyone else did.

And there is a small difference between him and the current left, that’s why I’d rather he win.

But chances are his second term will just be more debt, very little substance, and ultimately a continuation of the status quo, just like his first admin.

Plenty on the right just act like he’s the greatest politician ever. Just like some on the left are doing with Kamala now. It’s like sports fans.

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

Wasn’t Operation Warpspeed a Trump endeavor?

He didn't make the so called vaccines though.

Would you think better of him if he had done nothing?

In July of 2020, after having funded the R&D, Trump’s operation Warp Speed placed an advanced purchase order worth 2 Billion dollars for 100 million doses of the Pfizer Vaccine on the condition that it would be approved by the FDA. In November, shortly after the election, as I recall, it WAS approved by the FDA for human use, and the Trump Administration quickly ordered another 100 million doses. All 200 million doses were eventually produced and made available to the public at no cost and injected into American arms.

Seems like that qualifies as “he made the vaccines”.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
I didn’t single him out, I said I found it odd he’s considered some sort of economic god when he did the same thing everyone else did.

And there is a small difference between him and the current left, that’s why I’d rather he win.

Yeah, well I don't know anyone IRL or on here that sees him
as a god like person. Sure there are a lot of hyberbolic meme
that are in good humor but do people take those seriously?

But to say there is little difference between him and the
left, well that is missing the mark imo. Remember he
tried to legislate with Congress, not executive order.

Biden has issued so many executive orders who can
even keep track? Many of them were to undo what
Trump did. Come on now, you can't see that? Its like
an epic battle of old school super hero's, its so evident.

But chances are his second term will just be more debt, very little substance, and ultimately a continuation of the status quo, just like his first admin.

Your entitled to your opinion, of course. But there is plenty of
evidence that he was extremely different and right leaning in
legislative policy, compared to Obama. Its not even debatable.

What do you think the Dem's are talking about when they decry
off of his accomplishments? Why did Biden undo them all?

originally posted by: Boomer1947

Seems like that qualifies as “he made the vaccines”.

Need I get out the dictionary for you?

Who actually made the vaccines?

Good grief, people just make stuff up now?