"Walz Is a Maoist To The Core"--Walz Student Says

If you can’t read articles and you’re dyslexic. Your opinion is thus completely useless, null. Void.

a reply to: AcrobaticDreams1

a reply to: CarlLaFong

Unnecessarily long answer:

I would want to get a red book if I was ever in China. I would bring back all the things you can only get there. When I go to Las Vegas I collect the "escort" trading cards regardless of my thoughts on the unregulated prostitution in Clark County, NV.

But yeah I read the article. Seems the NYT article cited had its context stripped in favor of the narrative inserted by the next two articles.

Seems like he wanted to compare and contrast USA to China. And in the 1990s they weren't doing free market capitalism to the extent they are now. Now, they have sectors of employment with differenciating pay scales and globally competitive pay.

A US Expat makes on average 202k USD working in China. Average Beijing resident makes about 50k USD annually. They have a minimum wage and like the USA 50% of their population is "middle class". Communism is mostly a state media thing for them now. Their economy is mostly a Ponzi scheme, and you have no ability to call them out for it. Lest you read the little red book. Which serves its only purpose in instilling state subservience above all else.

The still marginally communist China of Tim Walz 90s visits on the top, "communist" China of Today below.



The 1995 China from the article is really outdated.

And he reminds me of my dad. Patriotic retired US Airforce Intelligence. Spent part of his service in The Phillipines looking at satellite imagery. He saId they called soviets "3CP"

But I remember in 1989, right after my birthday, I was made to watch something by my Dad. I remember him saying "This is the most important event you'll ever see."

And that's they day I learned about East and West Germany. Memory hazy buy I remember happy people and a destroyed wall.

Walz comes off like that, not really admiration for the culture itself, but a want to share how different things are there and compare it to here. And spread awareness beyond the typical tunnel vision that Americans have of the rest of the world.

Maybe it will be him visiting Taiwan next time? Last time we sent the vampire. Next time they'll send someone even higher in the administration to taunt the CCP.

Nikita Khrushchev would say "the paper tiger has nuclear teeth". That's relatively true of Chinese relations regardless of party. Talk really tough and then host CCP individuals/money as VIP guests at your many hotel properties. Or have your son take money through his business ventures. Or whatever. There is no glass pane left in the house of influential China money for anyone.

And China isn't buying it anyway. We're the same to them no matter who is in power. They're not exactly doing handsprings over Harris/Walz either.

apnews.com...

Maybe a little, if you consider Alibaba the CCP's "outer representative" of propaganda dissemination.

And now I'm losing track of everything Tim Walz is.

We have:

• "stolen valor"
• Hosted radical muslim cleric at Governor's mansion several times.
• Approved funds to charity connected to Kuwaiti Al Qaida sympathizers.
• Supports Infanticide by signing MN "no limit" abortion law.
• Loves visiting China and bringing back "The Little Red Book," because he's secretly a commie!
• 🎵 "tampons in the boys room." 🎵
• Wife likes the smell of burning tires.

They so got Michigan now!

Next, may I suggest tarnishing his record as a football coach? You could go the Vasity Blues route and find someone to say he injected kids with anabolic steroids and cortisol to win the state championship?

a reply to: Degradation33

Their economy is mostly a Ponzi scheme

Yes that's correct aka Communism . Perhaps you just do not wanna correlate it with the word communism.

America's Social Security system is just a Ponzi scheme .

Though I use the word ' scheme ' with a grain of salt because a Ponzi system works just fine ..... That is until it doesn't and then it becomes a " Scheme " .

China is very much communist . Yes they are smart enough to loosen the governmental regulations where it matters but make no mistake they keep the bolts tightened down on there citizens .

a reply to: Degradation33

If Walz or Harris ever displayed their policy positions on energy, economy, taxes, foreign policy, the border, we'd probably have more substantial things to discuss.

MAGA convinced 'scary and dangerous' Walz is Chinese sleeper agent and are living in fear
⚠️

MAGA are convinced that Tim Walz is some kind of 'Chinese sleeper agent' - and are peddling their wild theories on Fox News.

The Minnesota governor has visisted China an estimated 30 times, spending a year teaching at a high school in the country as part of one of the first government-sanctioned groups of American teachers.

Walz, who was accused of 'betraying his country', went to China on his honeymoon with wife Gwen and reportedly still speaks some Mandarin, which has left Donald Trump supporters extremely concerned.

a reply to: xuenchen

Walz, the Manchurian Candidate.

a reply to: Degradation33

so all of those things are true, but folks are wrong for mentioning it?

a reply to: DBCowboy

I know her policies. She's not yell/tweeting them in all caps, but you can read between the lines.

So far we've got:

• Stop project 2025
• Fight to reestablish abortion as a 14th amendment protection. With Promise to sign the law restoring it. Logistics be damned.
• Continue with the current border security bill.
• Continue with a typical democrat budget and tax plan.
• Proposed 2nd highest corporate tax rate in the west. (so an increase in federal programs and spending can be inferred)
• Continue "building from bottom up and middle out" and add more manufacturing jobs through investment. Syracuse microchip plant cited.
• Reaffirm commitment to DEI and probably CRT.
• Raise federal minimum wage
• unionized wage preference
• Continue with ACA, no single payer coming.
• Continue capping prescription costs for seniors
• different than Joe on border

There tons of policies if you CAN listen to her speeches, she's just doesn't spoon feed it on her campaign website. Or explicitly and compulsively state her plan of action in 280 characters of less.

I actually like her being restrained on laying out an easy to digest plan. It could be deceptive, but it's totally something I do in leadership roles. I say less. I let the bulk dictate what the plan of action is in greatest compromise for everyone. Figure out what approach yields the most advantage for all competitive parties, and that would be constrained by invoking my specific ideology.

Unity and compromise is more likely through lack of a defined position, and being mum of your personal agenda.

Or maybe it's restrained to be the antithesis of her opponent? If saying less is more, speaking too clearly may leave it all unsung.

Or maybe she's initially noncommittal like EVERY DEMOCRAT EVER SINCE HARRY S. TRUMAN!?

a reply to: Degradation33

as you have displayed intelligence previously, I'd love to hear your take on why the border was opened by Biden and Harris, left alone to allow as many in as possible, and not all of the sudden, in 2024, a border bill was presented, it was awful and Trump assisted in shutting it down. So why the sudden change in border policy? Are we all supposed to believe the border czar all of the sudden wants to do another 180?

Why should we trust her on the border?

originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: CarlLaFong

Next, may I suggest tarnishing his record as a football coach?

Have at it.
It shouldn't be that difficult to find something icky.

Walz' life is an open little red book.

a reply to: Degradation33

Given Kamala's predisposition to lying, cheating, retracting statements frequently, etc., why should anyone believe and trust her now? 😊

And many of "Her" policy suggestions are things Democrats could have easily passed when they had the power.

Keep in mind too, Democrats have been fighting their "War on Poverty" for 60 years, and the number of people in poverty has steadily increased especially under their own power domes. 💥

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: CarlLaFong

Next, may I suggest tarnishing his record as a football coach?

Have at it.
It shouldn't be that difficult to find something icky.

Walz' life is an open little red book.

We must all study like good followers: 💮

Quotations from Mao Tse Tung

The Kamala/Walz step-child ...... 🖐️


Great Chinese Famine

The Great Chinese Famine (Chinese: 三年大饥荒; lit. 'three years of great famine') was a famine that occurred between 1959 and 1961 in the People's Republic of China (PRC).[2][3][4][5][6] Some scholars have also included the years 1958 or 1962.[7][8][9][10] It is widely regarded as the deadliest famine and one of the greatest man-made disasters in human history, with an estimated death toll due to starvation that ranges in the tens of millions (15 to 55 million).[note 1] The most stricken provinces were Anhui (18% dead), Chongqing (15%), Sichuan (13%), Guizhou (11%) and Hunan (8%).[1]

The major contributing factors in the famine were the policies of the Great Leap Forward (1958 to 1962) and people's communes, launched by Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party Mao Zedong, such as inefficient distribution of food within the nation's planned economy, . . . . . . . . . . . . .

a reply to: Degradation33

How has it worked so far?

I mean, this is almost identical to the past 4 years.

As for the border bill? That's open amnesty on 5,000 people per day.

It's a disgusting travesty of a bill.

a reply to: network dude

Okay, scarlet letter coming. Unrestrained border and political opinion therein. It will come off very TDS so you know ahead of time.

Begin:

I think it was sensationalized by far right-leaning tabloid trash and blown up into an apocalyptic problem to blame the unwanted ("election stealing") administration and polarize everyone as dissappointed as them to embrace divisive politics.

Yeah, Joe's numbers were insane. He made errors in complacency . But so did George W Bush. His 2007 numbers are actually higher with 30 million less Americans. Its selective anger. Fake anger.

Why wasn't there hyperbole and overreaction for it in 2007? Never heard of the 2006/2007 migrant crisis. I heard of how cool adjustable rate mortgages were and how they were fulfilling the American Dream for the working class. The difference between then and now is, 15 years ago they didn't turn themselves in, immediately declare amnesty, and overload resources. Of course leniency will be exploited.

Any time there's global war, displacement, and economic problems the "American Dream" becomes popular and having relatively the same border as 2007 gives you almost 2007 numbers.

I think it's the same as Bush only it can be criticized easier. Like way easier. A wanting criticism.

I feel many of the critical have lost their ability for recognition of self and have become a mostly projecting cult of personality hive mind.

Like a memetic superorganism that feeds on one-sided vitriol and grows into a monster vampire not seeing it's reflection anymore.

Nevermind that for 2 or 3 of those years, all attempts at border reform were rejected based on the votes of Trump-affiliated congressional representatives.

I thought this quote from Jaime Raskin was good.

Now we fight, in our time to defend our freedom and democracy against The Banana Republicans who have converted Lincoln's party into a dangerous Cult of Personality. (full speech here)

One I feel is so insidious and invasive it programs adherents to respond with anger when having a mirror held up to itself. It cant even recognize its own ascent towards fascism and subservience.

It's like watching 1936 and screaming "YOU'RE DOING IT AGAIN" but having everyone laugh at you, reverse criticism, and call you MORE brainwashed for not seeing your own union happy marxism and socialist brainwashing doing everything communist but putting up the Lenin statue. The inherent pot/kettle. I'm actually the one being stopped in a reality I refuse to see. "GO AWAY BOLSHEVIK!"

For the religiousity being exploited, it's even more perplexing that it can't recognize a devil that has everyone pointing fingers at everyone else, fighting Amalekites, wallowing in anger, and making it ALL ABOUT A SINGLE PERSON, that is bigger than Jesus, and has now pulled off a miracle at the halfway point of it's split reign, and has since equated his survival to quasi-prophethood.

And if we are going to put it bluntly.

I'm almost certain Trump is the f*cking (archytpal) antichrist incarnate. Life imitating art before stone-etched prophecy.

Meaning he culturally fulfills the role of a person/social character who makes themselves THE religion. Makes themselves the thing people care about most and devote the most attention to. They make themselves the idol. The guru. The leader. The everything and encapsulation of a promise they sell to you for the power you give them.

All attention given to him, for better or worse, throws more oxidized pennies at his altar.

He scares the f*cking sh*t out of me.

a reply to: xuenchen

Oh yeah! See this from the same wiki page:

Along with collectivization, the central government decreed several changes in agricultural techniques that would be based on the ideas of later-discredited Soviet agronomist Trofim Lysenko.[81] One of these ideas was close planting, whereby the density of seedlings was at first tripled and then doubled again. The theory was that plants of the same species would not compete with each other. In natural cycles they did fully compete, which actually stunted growth and resulted in lower yields.

Another policy known as "deep plowing" was based on the ideas of Lysenko's colleague Terentiy Maltsev, who encouraged peasants across China to eschew normal plowing depths of 15–20 centimeters and instead plow deeply into the soil (1 to 2 Chinese feet or 33 to 66 cm). The deep plowing theory stated that the most fertile soil was deep in the earth, and plowing unusually deeply would allow extra-strong root growth. While deep plowing can increase yields in some contexts, the policy is generally considered to have hindered yields in China.

And there's a Youtube about Lysenko too:
The Absolute Worst Scientist Of All Time - And Why He’s Popular Again