It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: rigel4
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
originally posted by: Mahogani
Funny how it leaves out things like felony, conviction, fraud, rape.
When it comes to court, there aren't two ways of seeing it.
Then let's add another line that covers that aspect then, according to the pattern set out.
"You see felony, conviction, fraud and rape from the MSM, I only see weaponized lawfare"
I see with my own eyes the con job that is Trump. You only see through deluded eyes that fell for the con.
originally posted by: argentus
a reply to: network dude
Agree. It is why I prefer reading transcripts of speeches to watching the performance -- it weeds out the annoying bits and delivers the intended message. It is also why I lean heavily upon measurable data, because it allows me to see the issues more clearly without the cloud of hyperbole. What I REALLY DON'T NEED is some biased "news" pundit to explain to me what I've just seen with my own eyes, because I'm just SO stupid that I couldn't possibly understand what it really means.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Blue_Jay33
A better question might be what creates the perspectives and opinions people have and promotes the division?
Life is the answer.
A person's cultural background, their experiences, and the social/economic environment in which they exist.
Never mind the religious and philosophical beliefs they choose to entertain.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Justoneman
Well, you know who was best friends with the creep in the past and even wished his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell all the best before her trial.....
Unfortunately, lots of things are true Justoneman.
As to whether or not they will ever be allowed to come to light.............
originally posted by: Mahogani
Funny how it leaves out things like felony, conviction, fraud, rape.
When it comes to court, there aren't two ways of seeing it.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Justoneman
How many times was he on that plane Justoneman?
Trump is apt to be on his list.
The same as many other rich and famous influential people.
From some of the Clintons to RFK or Prince Andrew.
Trump's track record and the way he treats women speak volumes.
Anyhoo something i imagine we will simply have to disagree about.
www.miamiherald.com...
www.theguardian.com...
www.theguardian.com...
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Xtrozero
So it's only justice when the verdict suits?
That would be convenient for those found guilty.
If it were not for the fact that its not how your laws work.
Nor how your court systems function.
They require facts and evidence to resolve legal disputes and ensure justice is served.
originally posted by: andy06shake
So it's only justice when the verdict suits?
That would be convenient for those found guilty.
If it were not for the fact that its not how your laws work.
Nor how your court systems function.
They require facts and evidence to resolve legal disputes and ensure justice is served.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp
If you say so.
As to whats noted, that would be your attitude for a start.
Anyhoo must press on today things to do.
80 bottles of beer on the wall, 80 bottles of beer.
originally posted by: Justoneman
Andy it is only justice when it is fair. We are based on the gov MUST PROVE beyond a shadow of doubt and not the perp must.
Fair is the issue.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Justoneman
How many times was he on that plane Justoneman?
Trump is apt to be on his list.
The same as many other rich and famous influential people.
From some of the Clintons to RFK or Prince Andrew.
Trump's track record and the way he treats women speak volumes.
Anyhoo something i imagine we will simply have to disagree about.
www.miamiherald.com...
www.theguardian.com...
www.theguardian.com...