FBI Cover Up - Trump Shooters Body is Gone

a reply to: Mantiss2021

You think all of that would have happened in time for the election? The nation would still be mourning come election day.

The Republicans had no other candidate. Trump was it. JD Vance hadn't been announced yet.

With the RNC being two days away, it would have surely been canceled.

You believe there was some nefarious plan to take over the GOP by the election, three months away?

Really?

That would have been one hell of a plan and no way would it have worked out in GOPs favor.

Let's stop beating around the bush and call it what it is/was.

It was an attempt, by the Democrats, to kill Trump.

They tried to kill Trump. They = the people the Democrats support. (Obama, Hillary, Biden, Kamala, Pelosi, etc.)

If you support Democrats, you support the attempted murder of the next U.S. President.

On a side note. Anyone heard about the female SS agent at the Trump rally the other day who left her post to breast feed her baby.

Why does the SS even have babies with them at all ?

What is going on in this country?

I really believe they are trying to get us to revolt. They aren't this dumb or incompetent. There is another agenda.

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

The key word being "Pretend".

It appears that Crooks fully expected to (at least attempt to) escape in the panic that resulted from his shooting, hence the (unused) remote-controlled explosive device(s) found in his possession. It is possible (probable) that his expectation was only bolstered by the fact that he was able to access, and maintain, his "sniper nest" unhindered for a good period of time.

Was Crooks told by "someone" that the SS and the local police were "in on the 'prank'"?

There does not seem to be any evidence (at least none yet released to the public) that Crooks was suicidal, despite the audacity of his action: he left no conventional suicide note, did not appear to be depressed, or homicidal to friends or family prior to acting out. His social media, what there was of it, supposedly spoke of "his Premier", rather than his "final act".


But we'll never know because "someone" forgot to tell the countersnipers that Crooks was "just playing",


That it was all just "Pretend".

Word salad to tell us we should believe you and not our eyes.

That doesn't work for us here on ATS.. Well a couple will fall for it.

originally posted by: Mantiss2021
a reply to: FlyersFan

To call the "early" release of the the body an attempt by the FBI to "cover up" something by "destroying" evidence (or being somehow complicit in its destruction) smacks of hyperbolic excess.


Realistically, any, and all, forensic evidence the corpse could provide could/would have been discovered and collected as evidence within hours, or at the most, days, of an autopsy.

The body "told its tale" and would have been of no further use to investigators. Therefore, there would have been no justifiable reason to prolong the agony of the deceased next of kin by continuing to secure the corpse.


Whether the protocols for the body's release were, themselves, properly followed, if said protocols were "expedited", (out of compassion for the parents), neither case would have impacted the evidence already gathered. And the remains would not really have had any further forensic value.

originally posted by: SourGrapes
a reply to: Blaine91555

No!! There absolutely is a cover up going on. There is no moving on or getting past this.

Trump was almost JFK'd, this isn't something to move on from.

When someone commits a crime and they want to cover it up what do they do?


Destroy Evidence.


These same people created evidence for the man who was shot to be indicted.


Are we paying attention yet?


The FBI is actively attempting to stop Donald Trump from being alive on election day.

"without informing the county coroner" ?

So the FBI give him a new identity and they allready paid him!

you can Not trust Any thing from the FBI.

a reply to: SourGrapes

Yes, apparently people DO want this swept under the rug. It's a very hurtful narrative which points directly to their favored political party, and there is no viable alternative explanation. They can't have this, so they want it swept away where it won't be out in the light of day for all to see.

As you've said a couple times, and I will also echo it...let's not mince words here. The assassination attempt on Trump was politically motivated, and democrats are trying to dismiss this event as if it didn't happen. Why would anyone want to dismiss it? Answer - Because they have something to hide. It's the only logical explanation.

At every turn, democrats have attempted to minimize this event, to deflect from all the 'coincidental' failures (which are looking more and more deliberate every day) and to "move on". Then there are all the excuses, like the bullying (which probably never happened, but it doesn't matter). And, where is the toxicology report anyway?

Now with no body, there is no way to validate any forthcoming toxicology report, and so many other things. This 'failure' to follow protocol with the body isn't a "failure" at all, it is just another in a very long list of deliberate attempts to "COVER UP" a deliberate assassination attempt. If the democrats were wise (and innocent) they would be working harder than anyone to prove it wasn't 'allowed' to happen on their watch. They would want more than anyone else to exonerate any and all implications their party could have been in any way involved. But apparently they feel the public is too stupid to see these things, and instead they just want the matter to 'go away'. Well, it's NOT going to go away. Not today, not tomorrow...not ever! This will be in the history books until...well, until the democrats re-write them too, as they have with so many others.

This wasn't just an assassination attempt of John Q. Public, this was an assassination attempt on the leading candidate for the office of President of the United States. Perhaps Blaine and others would like to ignore this uncomfortable not so little truth, but it changes nothing. It happened, and their party allowed it to happen at the very minimum. Yes, this stings, and it should. But what will sting even more is if and/or when their party is found to not only have 'allowed' it to happen, but in fact 'sponsored' it to happen. People should already be behind bars for the failures to date, but they are not. No one has even been terminated. Worse, they even PROMOTED the very guy who gave the stand down orders to the SS at the rally after Cheatle's resignation! Unbelievable!

But yeah, let's just sweep this under the carpet because people have..."milked this for all its worth. Lord knows those in Congress have."

I couldn't possibly disagree more!

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

how many things had to go right/wrong in order for the attempt to even happen?

It only took one thing to go wrong actually. A total lack of communication between the locals and the SS. That left Trump wide open.

There does not always need to be a conspiracy. It can be just one nut with a gun. In fact, that is the most likely to be true. The simplest answer is usually right.

originally posted by: SourGrapes
a reply to: Blaine91555

No!! There absolutely is a cover up going on. There is no moving on or getting past this.

Trump was almost JFK'd, this isn't something to move on from.

Is it that the communications screwup combined with a nut with a gun can't be the truth of it? Or that people want it to be something more than the idea that is fueled by partisan hate?

a reply to: Blaine91555

If that's the case, the SS should allow a non-partisan and fully transparent investigation, right?

With charges brought against those that destroyed or deleted any evidence, right?

Right?

originally posted by: Blaine91555
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

how many things had to go right/wrong in order for the attempt to even happen?

It only took one thing to go wrong actually. A total lack of communication between the locals and the SS. That left Trump wide open.

There does not always need to be a conspiracy. It can be just one nut with a gun. In fact, that is the most likely to be true. The simplest answer is usually right.

That's not the entirety.

Secret services lack of pre work for the site, allowing him on the stage and of course the lack of numbers to name a few.

The simplest answer is incompetence. Granted.

How much incompetence does it take to rise to the level of reckless disregard?

originally posted by: Blaine91555

originally posted by: SourGrapes
a reply to: Blaine91555

No!! There absolutely is a cover up going on. There is no moving on or getting past this.

Trump was almost JFK'd, this isn't something to move on from.

... Or that people want it to be something more than the idea that is fueled by partisan hate?

No, Blaine. What it truly is that the event was "allowed" to happen, and it truly IS partisan HATE which fueled it. Not only did "they" allow it to happen, they encouraged it to happen...AND, this is the least definition of the day. A more accurate one might be...this was a coordinated and deliberate event.

Yet you just want this to go away, be swept under the carpet with no further investigation. Just some J.Q. Public dude who got shot at...no worries, enough said...end of discussion.

Your pontification of HATE is directed in the wrong direction...you need to look inward toward your own people!

So now we know what happened to the body... I wonder when we will find out about his phone.

In another post I asked the possibility of a gun being rigged to exploded sending shrapnel back into the shooter. Could Crooks have inadvertently shot himself? I was wondering if Crooks gun was damaged.
Well now I’m seeing articles that the Secret Service sniper shot Crooks gun. It doesn’t prove anything but it’s really odd to me this is a new detail that would explain a damaged gun.

A local sniper likely saved lives at former President Donald Trump's rally in Butler Township last month when his single shot hit the attempted assassin's gun.

Sniper hit gun

a reply to: TheLieWeLive
I'm of the idea that the whole thing was staged.

1. I've heard people say there was a communication problem but there was an SS agent right outside the building.

2. That a counter sniper team on the other side of the venue, in the bleachers next to the pond, took him out.

3. That the counter sniper team on the barn to Trump's left had to turn around to engage because the other team couldn't see Crooks because of a tree and that was the delay.

4. A ground officer climbed onto something and shot and hit Crooks.

5. And now this, A Butler SWAT sniper hit his rifle from a 100 yards, which is about the distance to the water tower, but we have been shown images of Crooks shouldering the rifle with his right shoulder so there is no way to hit his stock from the water tower without going through his head. There is nothing to his right for over 300 yards unless the sniper was up in a tree. Also, a 100 yard shot is not the kind of shot a "sniper" misses but even if we can accept he didn't kill him in the first shot, why wouldn't he keep shooting until the threat was eliminated?

And I'm right back where I have been this whole time, that wasn't what the script indicated.

Never Forget The Grassy Knoll !
and now we have The Slippery roof !

No one is forgeting the Assassination of John F. Kennedy.
November 22, 1963.

The Trump Assassination attempt will
be remember for 1000's of years.
Now one will EVER trust the EVIL the Democrats.
They kill Lots of people!

ok ALL governments !

a reply to: SourGrapes

With the RNC being two days away, it would have surely been canceled.

The political party is bigger than one man. It would of been chaos, a lot of infighting of who gets the top job. A big push by the RINO's, Cheney's and likes of Nicky Haley would of been made.

When it came to signing off on the JFK hit, it was not just one group or organization that wanted it but a gathering of a few powerful factions that wanted in. Biden had a lot to gain by getting Trump out, so do the never Trumpers in the RNC. Those that support the Ukraine war against Russia are high on the radar to be motivated enough to support such an action. As with JFK, there was a lot of different reasons by a lot of different people.

You believe there was some nefarious plan to take over the GOP by the election, three months away?

It is on the suspect list at this time.

a reply to: daskakik

5. And now this, A Butler SWAT sniper hit his rifle from a 100 yards...

Shot #9 came from an officer on the ground, north of the bleachers near the speakers.

Still some mixed messages about shot #10. Maybe another officer near shot #9 or the sniper team way south near the pond.