Video shows Project 2025 co-author discussing his secret work preparing for a 2nd Trump term

a reply to: Mahogani

All throughout the war the Nazis were culling their own at home, people with long term disabilities, mental health issues, etc. Aktion t4, devout followers either kept their head in the sand and denied its existence, or pointed the Fuhrer didn't draft it all up or condoned it publicly so it wasn't happening.
But it was, and there was entire blueprints drafted up for the public to see.

So don't worry, once a bunch of these people vote for the Supreme leader and see the conditions of their kids public schools they'll wonder what happened... oh look Lil Timmy who goes to collective soul Christian Bible school just got a new iPad.

a reply to: Mahogani

Good for that co-author!! Great to discuss it and keep it fresh in the crazed minds of the libtards....however Trump doesn't support nor does he endorse agenda 2025. He has some great policies on his website...you know policies..things you won't see on Kamala's site because she doesn't have any.

a reply to: strongfp

It's amazing how you can think and articulate so well what you're worried about.



....and not see it happening currently.

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

It has a strong chance to happen. Project 2025 and agenda 47 have exact sentiments towards reforming public education in the US to allow for parents to siphon off funds that would go to public education and put it into private institutions.

I made the parallel with the Aktion T4 because the German government at the time saw public health for certain individuals as useless baggage, so either juat get rid of them or force families to take on the burden of caring for their loved ones.

It's the same sort of playbook, undermine public education until people are forced to pay for their kids to go to some private institution where they can ram whatever religious nonsense down kids throats.

This isn't a short term plan, it's a long term one. A full on war against free thinking secularism and the American constitution.

a reply to: strongfp

The Constitution isn't secular...


Regardless, all I see is you afraid Trump might do what the people in power are currently doing.

Yet when Trump was in office, your hyperbolic fears were realized then either.

a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

Never said the constitution was secular, but it most definitely allows for the US as a nation to allow secularist thoughts and free thinking.

What is the current administration doing exactly to things like education? Is it anything as drastic as agenda 47 proposes for public education?

And before you go off about books about gay people or whatever, that has been challenged correctly already in many school districts. It's not a federal issue.

a reply to: strongfp

Keeping the bar very low while spending in historic fashion.

...for starters.

a reply to: strongfp

Is it anything as drastic as agenda 47 proposes for public education?

Drastically better…

Restoring Parental Rights

Great Principals and Great Teachers

Knowledge and Skills, Not CRT and Gender Indoctrination

Love of Country

Freedom to Pray

Safe, Secure and Drug-Free

Universal School Choice

Project Based Learning

Internships and Work Experience

Jobs and Career Counseling

All great stuff 👌

a reply to: Vermilion

All of those things already exist or are contested in an equal civil manner.

The drastic measure is taking funding away from public education and funneling it into private institutions.

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: Vermilion

All of those things already exist or are contested in an equal civil manner.

The drastic measure is taking funding away from public education and funneling it into private institutions.

The money follows the students.
I don’t see your problem here.
The schools get the same money per student.
Agenda 47 makes sure it goes to learning instead of indoctrination.

a reply to: strongfp

What is the current administration doing exactly to things like education?

Indoctrinating our children, allowing sexualization of our children by teachers, books and drag queens, allowing males in women’s locker rooms and bathrooms, allowing males to compete in women’s sports taking away opportunities for girls to advance, teaching the DEI nonsense, threatening lunch programs for the poor over title IX, taking away parents rights to parent by hiding identity issues. The feds can and do have a say in many of these issues if they were to so choose.

Title IX is a federal issue. Just because states may have the final say in some of these issues, don’t kid yourself for a second that it’s not being pushed hard and pressured by this administration. You don’t get to say … but “don’t look here” when the federal government is absolutely behind much of this. State and federal are all intertwined and ideologically driven behind the curtain.

My daughter is one of these off the wall libs teaching and pushing these democrat agendas to kids in a alternative secondary school, drives me crazy, I didn’t raise her like this but what do ya do.

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp

It has a strong chance to happen. Project 2025 and agenda 47 have exact sentiments towards reforming public education in the US to allow for parents to siphon off funds that would go to public education and put it into private institutions.

I made the parallel with the Aktion T4 because the German government at the time saw public health for certain individuals as useless baggage, so either juat get rid of them or force families to take on the burden of caring for their loved ones.

It's the same sort of playbook, undermine public education until people are forced to pay for their kids to go to some private institution where they can ram whatever religious nonsense down kids throats.

This isn't a short term plan, it's a long term one. A full on war against free thinking secularism and the American constitution.

Right now the american public education system is forcing Marxism down the children's throat, but your okay with that. The private schools are not all religious based. We want private schooling that leaves political and religious leanings out and sticks to teaching math, science and english based on how the child learns not how they decided the child should learn. People are different and have a personality and learning type, the idea is to create schools that cater to that.

a reply to: some_stupid_name

Well that's interesting, teaching elementary school kids 19th century moral philosophy and alternative economic models?

Smart kids. Can you show me this curriculum?

originally posted by: Vermilion

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: Vermilion

All of those things already exist or are contested in an equal civil manner.

The drastic measure is taking funding away from public education and funneling it into private institutions.

The money follows the students.
I don’t see your problem here.
The schools get the same money per student.
Agenda 47 makes sure it goes to learning instead of indoctrination.

Taking tax payer money and allowing parents to funnel the money into a private institution is OK with you?

a reply to: KrustyKrab

I've heard these talking points a thousand times before. And I don't buy it. Again, most of the issues involving sex education is contested at the district level, and not enforced by federal government.

I gotta ask, what exactly is wrong with Title IX and it's core position?

originally posted by: strongfp

originally posted by: Vermilion

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: Vermilion

All of those things already exist or are contested in an equal civil manner.

The drastic measure is taking funding away from public education and funneling it into private institutions.

The money follows the students.
I don’t see your problem here.
The schools get the same money per student.
Agenda 47 makes sure it goes to learning instead of indoctrination.

Taking tax payer money and allowing parents to funnel the money into a private institution is OK with you?

It’s not taking anything.
The students each get the same amount regardless of race or sex.
Is that your hang up here?
The money is already there from people paying their taxes.
It follows the students to whichever school they attend.
It’s no business of mine what school somebody wants to send their kids to.

Property owners, like myself, have bigger issues with people who don’t pay the school taxes using school tax monies, then want to dictate to me where I send my kid to school.

a reply to: Vermilion

I'm pretty sure it doesn't work like that. Money is alloted for children to attend public school. Not a private school.

If that's changed to allow even wealthy parents to take, I guess "their share" for their kids, do you think that's fair to families who can't afford a private school to begin with?
That's just one unethical issue I see.

a reply to: strongfp

You do know that the children of politicians and the wealthy send their children to private schools, right?

If the $$ follows the children, they can actually attend the same private schools as the politicians and wealthy.

The Democrats don't want their children to share classrooms with the lesser population.

Like Biden didn't want black kids on the same busses with his kids.

a reply to: SourGrapes

I don't think any money alloted for public education should go anywhere near private schools. At all.

You want to send your kids to a private school, great do it. But pay for it out of your own pocket.

a reply to: strongfp

Is it because you don't want those poor kids in your kids classes?