Video shows Project 2025 co-author discussing his secret work preparing for a 2nd Trump term

originally posted by: Mahogani

originally posted by: theatreboy
a reply to: nugget1

Seriously, Trump has said many times he does not support project 2025.

Leave the echo chamber please.

I will not leave your echo chamber, but thanks for the suggestion.

Thanks for reading. Did you watch the video in full?

Yup. Bloviating guy he is.

BTW, I do not have an echo chamber.

I listen to all sides, do my own research, and base my opinions on all that.

Most of my time is spent at NPR, CNN, JustTheNews, and what yall share here.

originally posted by: Wookiep
a reply to: TzarChasm

Very well said. This should be plastered everywhere so these rabid lefties could finally understand something for a change.

Sorry! 'Lefties' and 'understanding' are mutually exclusive.

originally posted by: ColeYounger2
This hysteria is right up there with the "Trump will end the human race" fever dreams the left was screaming about in 2017.

Let me post a 2017 quote from Yale psychiatrist Dr. Bandy Lee:
"As more time passes, we come closer to the greatest risk of danger, one that could even mean the extinction of the human species. This is not hyperbole. This is the reality." Deliriums from the left

Trump has not endorsed 2025, or "given it his blessing", and he's not going to install the radical right-wingers in his cabinet. These lefties make Chicken Little look rational and level-headed.

Al Gore took credit for inventing the internet, then told everyone it was likely New York, LA, Miami, and Seattle would be under water by 2016 due to ice melting.

Source: www.foxnews.com...

It has to do with a desire for money, power, and recognition. The TEDROS guy at the World Health Organization is on this trip too. It's mostly a Lefty thing, as you correctly stated.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Mahogani

I think Vought played it smart and said they didn’t get anything they couldn’t google.

I read the article, and I didn’t see any new connections that weren’t already public.

Are you kidding me? There's quite a bit in just that 10 min video that is new. Just having these head guys on video, spilling the beans is new. They've never done that on video before.

But the one thing that really stood out for me was that interview with Meadowcroft, where he basically gives away the process for the journalists to get all their documents through the Freedom of Information Act.

Meadowcroft says they will not send all these instructions to Trump's transition team through emails, because they are instructions for a transition team... and what does that mean? That is government work, that makes you a campaign employee. So they didn't send these out through emails and they won't, because then the journalists could request all their emails, and those would be covered by FOIA.

But he just told them they were making transition plans! They were just doing it secretly and didn't want to share it with the public.

They just opened themselves up to either FOIA requests, or lawsuits for doing government or campaign work in secret.

a reply to: Mahogani

Leftist Fascists accusing regular people of fascism.

*yawn*

What's the matter?

Calling us all Nazi's didn't take?

Yes Clem, Democrats really ARE this desperate to hide their own Bidenomics destructive planned agenda. We ain't seen noth'n yet. Wait till they get Kamala and a Democrat Congress back in !! 💥💥

Man that P2025 thing sure has some people triggered. I bet that's the real intent don't you? 😀

a reply to: xuenchen

I'm still hoping the real intent is to sue a bunch of people for spreading the lie that this is Trump's baby despite him saying he doesn't endorse it.

Maybe put them in prison for election interference.

Well, those Brits could sit down with me and I could tell them all the things me and Trump are going to do as well but it doesn’t mean anything. Project whatever are think tanks with donors and they hand over donations to the group that would most likely further their agenda.
The difference with project veritas is they are actually talking to the people who pull babies limbs off to make them partial birth abortions.

a reply to: Mahogani

I think there’s enough of his policy people can go after without going down the rabbit whole.

There’s still some connecting of the dots, and we could do that with anyone. DC during election cycles are an absolute cesspool.

The ironic part is I don’t think Trump is as conservative as his base or opponents believe. I think instead he’s an incredible opportunist.

He’s made a brand, he’s used to doing that. His platform you see is just that, a brand. I don’t think he has strong ideology aside from a commitment to himself. And to be fair, I’m describing most politicians here, it just so happens he found a different path.

a reply to: Mahogani

I think there’s enough of his policy people can go after without going down the rabbit whole.

There’s still some connecting of the dots, and we could do that with anyone. DC during election cycles are an absolute cesspool.

The ironic part is I don’t think Trump is as conservative as his base or opponents believe. I think instead he’s an incredible opportunist.

He’s made a brand, he’s used to doing that. His platform you see is just that, a brand. I don’t think he has strong ideology aside from a commitment to himself. And to be fair, I’m describing most politicians here, it just so happens he found a different path.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Mahogani
The ironic part is I don’t think Trump is as conservative as his base or opponents believe. I think instead he’s an incredible opportunist.

He’s made a brand, he’s used to doing that. His platform you see is just that, a brand. I don’t think he has strong ideology aside from a commitment to himself.

And what if he wants his brand to be The Greatest United States President in the History of United States Presidents?



.

originally posted by: Dapaga

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: Mahogani
The ironic part is I don’t think Trump is as conservative as his base or opponents believe. I think instead he’s an incredible opportunist.

He’s made a brand, he’s used to doing that. His platform you see is just that, a brand. I don’t think he has strong ideology aside from a commitment to himself.

And what if he wants his brand to be The Greatest United States President in the History of United States Presidents?

Than I suggest he try that.

a reply to: Mahogani

I have very confrontational thoughts when thinking about Project 2025. Should those hundreds of executive orders ever start being pushed through, and should they have an Evangelical tinge, then It will really bring out the adversary in me.

And only after it FURTHER effects me personally and especially if it makes a specific religion compulsory. Not worth losing my mind until that happens though. Even though the guy that wrote the foreword is the VP candidate. Just ignore that causal connection for now.

But if it does start happening I absolutely see myself becoming part of some great progressive opposing hive mind.

Good gawd not this stupid brain dead bs again🥱 🙄
But WTH, let’s do it, 2025 isn’t nearly as bad as the insane Marxist crap the left’s been pushing.

Just for once I’d like to see a lefty do their best at using the last two brain cells they might have left. They obsess over the stupidest # and think it’s worthy of discussion. No one gives a # about P 2025 except the mentally challenged that keep posting about it as if they have some gotcha now moment. I’m done.

a reply to: KrustyKrab

Consider this like LGBTQ-Anon.

*credit to Watchitburn (I think) for the unintended comparison idea.

Q-Anon - Bloodthirsty Elites like Oprah, Obama, Tom Hanks, and Nancy Pelosi are feeding off the pineal glands of children for Satanic immortality and using the funds of Soros to convert everyone to EVs and veganism. While giving your kids new pronouns to apply, curbing reproduction with rainbows and pandemics, unionizing all wages like commies, destroying all borders, globalizing everything, and socializing all healthcare everywhere.

LGBTQ-Anon- Zealots are using satanic cabal conspiracy theories and communist NWO fear to demonize the left and increase demand to insert more God into society. They are deliberately polarizing the right to purge itself of moderates (RINOs). They are installing their chosen candidates (like JD Vance), using their supreme court advantage, and laying the groundwork for a top-down christianization of the US government through executive order. With the ultimate goal being somewhere between an "elective monarchism" and "Christian Theocracy".

The left gets one "evil bogeyman oppressor" conspiracy.

originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: KrustyKrab

Consider this like LGBTQ-Anon.

*credit to Watchitburn for the unintended comparison idea.

Q-Anon - Bloodthirsty Elites like Oprah, Obama, Tom Hanks, and Nancy Pelosi are feeding off the pineal glands of children for Satanic immortality and using the funds of Soros to convert everyone to EVs and veganism. While giving your kids new pronouns to apply, curbing reproduction with rainbows and pandemics, unionizing all wages like commies, destroying all borders, globalizing everything, and socializing all healthcare everywhere.

LGBTQ-Anon- Zealots are using satanic cabal conspiracy theories and godless NWO fear to demonize the left and increase demand to insert more God into society. They are deliberately polarizing the right to purge itself of moderates (RINOs). They are installing their chosen candidates (like JD Vance), using their supreme court advantage, and laying the groundwork for a top-down christianization of the US government through executive order. With the ultimate goal being somewhere between an "elective monarchism" and "Christian Theocracy".

The left gets one "evil bogeyman oppressor" conspiracy.

I don’t really buy much into any of that crap. I’m very independent in my thinking, can think on my own and do my best to apply critical thinking to issues that come up in my daily affairs. I’m just not big on buying into other people’s boogeyman. I get what you’re saying and the gullible eat up most of what you said, I just don’t see it going down the way the “sky is falling” crowd thinks. Most all the fear mongering bs is exactly that, bs.

Almost everything on either sides agenda has to go through 3 branches of federal government and in most cases individual state legislators as well. So most of this nonsense will never see the light of day so why mind f ourselves over any of it. The P 2025 rhetoric is ridiculous if you want to buy into it that’s your prerogative but I think the whole scenario is senseless.

a reply to: Mahogani

What I enjoy is how just like everything else, anything that is thought to be supported by anyone that is "conservative" is always branded fascist. It is getting SO OLD.

I am 100% sure that the OP has not read any of what is in project 2025, nor can elucidate on what he or she finds so terrible about it other than, "IT'S FASCIST!"

I haven't read it, but I am pretty sure if the DNC overlords are saying it's bad it is probably actually a good thing.

I suppose I will have to wait until they force me to get the microchip installed under pain of death that I will ever understand the current "liberal progressive" mindset.

originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: Mahogani

I have very confrontational thoughts when thinking about Project 2025. Should those hundreds of executive orders ever start being pushed through, and should they have an Evangelical tinge, then It will really bring out the adversary in me.

And only after it FURTHER effects me personally and especially if it makes a specific religion compulsory. Not worth losing my mind until that happens though. Even though the guy that wrote the foreword is the VP candidate. Just ignore that causal connection for now.

But if it does start happening I absolutely see myself becoming part of some great progressive opposing hive mind.

America was born from the idea of freedom from any religious persecution

How does 53% of Christian America no doubt split into Republicans, Democrats, and other persuasions grab 81 million votes
It just doesn't add up, the Catholics and the Jewish have their influence on both sides. It's why a hyperChristian President is unlikely, now we are too fractured, and we will bounce one way for a little while, then we will drift over the other way. 12 out of the last 16 years we drifted left, now it may be time for a drive in the right lane. Maybe till we have more of a consensus, there will be no sweeping radical changes. There aren't enough votes in such an evenly split House and Senate

The percentages don't add up to a hyper-religious government, even the bible belt isn't where it was when I was a kid in the 70s. So politically it's fear-mongering to motivate thier base to vote, not much different than Trump pandering to the evangelicals, he needs them to not check out on the election, and it's one group that Trump's extraneous adventures really turn off. It's not surprising he is teasing them, if he gets 10% more to turn out he probably wins if not he doesn't.

This fact doesn't mean he will push that agenda, he has other issues in mind, it is reasonable and rational to suggest his concession of going with Vance was all that was needed to inspire a healthier turnout

Hell, the Republicans are wary of hyper-conservatives, the RINOS, but they can't lose the moderate Republican vote either.

ask Pat Buchannan

The survey below is from 10 years ago, I'd be willing to bet those percentages are much lower now.

53% said religion was very important in thier lives, it's likely it's less than 50% in 2024. Don't get me wrong they have some pull some power and they know politicians, but to fear we are going to have a Bangladeshi religious purging it's not possible numbers-wise. Politicians mostly want to make bank and get reelected, they couldn't paid enough to sell Project 2025. Look at how volatile the House and Senate elections are now.

www.pewresearch.org...

originally posted by: berbofthegreen
a reply to: Mahogani

I haven't read it, but I am pretty sure if the DNC overlords are saying it's bad it is probably actually a good thing.

BINGO! The inverse is true also, at least 90% of the time.